Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Kneecap


CaledonianGonzo

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, SheffJeff said:

Both of these links are over 18 months old and in that time alot has changed. On the human Rights Watch website there are countless articles since the one you reference detailing Israeli war crimes and Karim Khan has issued arrest warrants against Netanyahu And Gallant since that article was posted for war crimes in Gaza.

The articles were explaining the law as it  applied to Gaza. I don't think the international law has changed in 18 months. HRW and the ICC have applied that law and found Israel guilty of war crimes. The ICC also found Hamas guilty of war crimes. That gives Israel a right of self defense but not by committing further war crimes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, steviewevie said:

and I'll say again but I know it pisses people off...I don't think this would be happening unless the Oct 7th attacks had happened.

Victim blaming. And it was happening before Oct 7th. 100s of Palestinian kids were killed before Oct 7 in 2023. It’s been going on Since 1948. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Colorblindjames said:

Victim blaming. And it was happening before Oct 7th. 100s of Palestinian kids were killed before Oct 7 in 2023. It’s been going on Since 1948. 

Yes, but I don't think what is currently happening to Gaza would be happening unless Oct 7th had happened.

You're welcome to disagree, and we'll never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accepting your premise that things have indeed got worse for the Palestinians since October 7th gave Israel a pretext to fully rip off its mask - do you consider the conditions that the Palestinians were forced to live under prior to that - apartheid, malnutrition, arbitrary detention, deprived of rights the rest of the world takes for granted - were reasonable?

 

Would you just nod alonh with it if you lived in a land that became colonised by foreign military?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Accepting your premise that things have indeed got worse for the Palestinians since October 7th gave Israel a pretext to fully rip off its mask - do you consider the conditions that the Palestinians were forced to live under prior to that - apartheid, malnutrition, arbitrary detention, deprived of rights the rest of the world takes for granted - were reasonable?

 

Would you just nod alonh with it if you lived in a land that became colonised by foreign military?

No, I agree and accept all that. 

Simply saying that since Oct 7th the plight of Gazans has got a whole lot worse, you just have to look at the news. It is a whole new level now. Which is why of course Israel is the enemy who is doing this, but people are being brave enough to protest against Hamas.

I had real hope that somehow this latest ceasefire would work and maybe Trump's stupid words would embolden Egypt and others to get involved with rebuilding and running Gaza until some sort of stable Palestinian administration could take over...but instead it is explicitly genocide now, another Nakba. Trump doesn't seem to care, he's busy elsewhere, and the rest of the world does nothing..

 

Drone video shows Gaza before and after war as ceasefire holds

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biden was sh*t in relation to Israel and Gaza, but after a good start with Trump and the ceasefire Israel seem to think they have the green light to clear out Gaza and do whatever they need to do without worrying about international rules and laws. Harris would not be allowing this, I am pretty sure of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, TheDayman said:


Your logic is contradicting itself. You say you support innocent Iranians and Russians, but wouldn’t call yourself pro-Iran or pro-Russia because of their governments. Yet with Palestinians, you've reversed that by saying you can’t be pro-Palestinian because of Hamas.

Either we can distinguish people from their rulers, or we can’t?

Seems to me you're being quite selective with your empathy 🤷‍♂️

 

My logic is the same. Hamas are the Government of Gaza, same as with Russia and Iran. I can never call myself pro-Russia because of their leadership, despite having sympathy for suffering innocent civilians. I have sympathy for suffering innocent civilians in Palestine, but I'm not pro-Palestine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, The_Fish said:

 

My logic is the same. Hamas are the Government of Gaza, same as with Russia and Iran. I can never call myself pro-Russia because of their leadership, despite having sympathy for suffering innocent civilians. I have sympathy for suffering innocent civilians in Palestine, but I'm not pro-Palestine.

 

If we take that most (if not all governments) do and say sh*tty things - up to and including war crimes - as a starting point, then I think you have to look at 'to what ends'.

 

In Gaza, Hamas represent a uniquely immiserated population captive in the world's biggest open air prison and Hamas's goal is to liberate them into a new state and guarantee the right of return for the refugees created by the Nakba. 

 

That's a better aspiration than what's driven Putin to invade Ukraine - who are, incidentally, a far better analogue for the folk in Gaza than the Russians are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

If we take that most (if not all governments) do and say sh*tty things - up to and including war crimes - as a starting point, then I think you have to look at 'to what ends'.

 

In Gaza, Hamas represent a uniquely immiserated population captive in the world's biggest open air prison and Hamas's goal is to liberate them into a new state and guarantee the right of return for the refugees created by the Nakba. 

 

That's a better aspiration than what's driven Putin to invade Ukraine - who are, incidentally, a far better analogue for the folk in Gaza than the Russians are.

 

That's a great point. And blaming Hamas is really not unlike Trump saying Zelenski started the war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, clasher said:

 

That's a great point. And blaming Hamas is really not unlike Trump saying Zelenski started the war.

 

Anyone who's not noticed that Israel is now a passion project of the international far right, in the same way that Russia itself is, is simply not paying attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

If we take that most (if not all governments) do and say sh*tty things - up to and including war crimes - as a starting point, then I think you have to look at 'to what ends'.

 

In Gaza, Hamas represent a uniquely immiserated population captive in the world's biggest open air prison and Hamas's goal is to liberate them into a new state and guarantee the right of return for the refugees created by the Nakba. 

 

That's a better aspiration than what's driven Putin to invade Ukraine - who are, incidentally, a far better analogue for the folk in Gaza than the Russians are.


Hamas are a terrorist organisation who’s founding charter sets out their aim to destroy Israel. 
 

They have received billions in aid and used it to re-arm and build tunnels, rather than on trying to improve Gaza. 

 

I’m very supportive or Ukraine, but I have sympathy for innocents on all sides. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, The_Fish said:


Hamas are a terrorist organisation

 

This is a simple, declarative statement, but it belies the reality that the majority of countries globally don't designate them as such.  It's only really in Europe, the US, Canada, Australia i.e. the West that this considered an incontestable fact.  Brazil, India, China, all of Africa, etc think differently.  Even New Zealand until a couple of years back.

 

Given that Hamas have never - as far as I'm aware - operated outside of Palestine, do you think there's a political game afoot regarding such designations?

 

As for the charter and the money -  the former has already been covered extensively here and for the latter it's hardly unusual for any country to spend heavily on 'defence'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The_Fish said:


Hamas are a terrorist organisation who’s founding charter sets out their aim to destroy Israel. 
 

They have received billions in aid and used it to re-arm and build tunnels, rather than on trying to improve Gaza. 

 

I’m very supportive or Ukraine, but I have sympathy for innocents on all sides. 
 

I agree entirely. As someone said above though, Israel are by all measures, currently worse terrorists. They are the ones committing genocide, hence the justified anger and focus against them. When people counter israel criticism/justified hate with "what about hamas" - well yeah, we know hamas are bad, but our government is funding and supporting israel murdering innocents and explicitly engaging in ethnic cleansing, therefore "what about the bad people that are opposing them" almost feels irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Physical_graffiti said:

I agree entirely. As someone said above though, Israel are by all measures, currently worse terrorists. They are the ones committing genocide, hence the justified anger and focus against them. When people counter israel criticism/justified hate with "what about hamas" - well yeah, we know hamas are bad, but our government is funding and supporting israel murdering innocents and explicitly engaging in ethnic cleansing, therefore "what about the bad people that are opposing them" almost feels irrelevant.

Is our government funding and supporting Israel? I know we have arms contracts with them, but actually directly funding them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

Is our government funding and supporting Israel? I know we have arms contracts with them, but actually directly funding them?

well I suppose it's how you define it, but no the UK government doesn't ever directly 'fund' any other country i.e. "here's a bank transfer of £X". Even foreign aid to third world countries is generally done in the form of projects to develop infrastructure etc. We engage in £5billion of trade with israel.

 

In terms of direct support for their genocide, we provide arms to them, and directly engage in military support - the RAF conduct intelligence gathering flights over Gaza from their base in Cyprus and share with Israel. The patterns of these flights can be linked to specific attacks (e.g. one on a refugee camp). Note - the UK say these flights are to locate hostages.

 

TLDR; by "funding" I mean through trade, arms and military support

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Physical_graffiti said:

well I suppose it's how you define it, but no the UK government doesn't ever directly 'fund' any other country i.e. "here's a bank transfer of £X". Even foreign aid to third world countries is generally done in the form of projects to develop infrastructure etc. We engage in £5billion of trade with israel.

 

In terms of direct support for their genocide, we provide arms to them, and directly engage in military support - the RAF conduct intelligence gathering flights over Gaza from their base in Cyprus and share with Israel. The patterns of these flights can be linked to specific attacks (e.g. one on a refugee camp). Note - the UK say these flights are to locate hostages.

 

TLDR; by "funding" I mean through trade, arms and military support

Well there should be no excuses and all those should be at least suspended. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • If anyone sees Lakefest this weekend on any sites please post here, I’ve got alerts set. Been on TFG in recent years and not sold out yet. 
    • Half wishlist / half prediction (obviously too many big names) 
    • MINUS MONDAY Basement Jaxx 120  Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 140 CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 120  David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 65 (-10)  Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130  Garbage 125 GOAT 70  Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 125 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 120  Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 80 Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 140  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 100 Underworld 150 MAX Wilco 30 Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • So we've signed a Horny Czech, and Bruno's turned up the training camp instead of doing Isak's nonsense.   Still not sure I believe Bruno's staying mind, but glad he's not doing the sh*t Arsenal are asking him to do to lower the price. If they want him they can stump up.   My suspicion is that whichever of Madrid/Man City don't start next season with Rodri will go for Bruno, and one of them will come in while Arsenal have f**ked about trying to get him cheap, which while I absolutely want to keep him, would still be good enough bants and a nice middle finger that I wouldn't mind it so much. I just wish we'd report Arsenal for tapping up.   If rumours are to be believed, we're after 2 more defensive signings, and an attacking player, on top of a replacement if Bruno leaves, having already signed a LW, 2 CMs, a GK, and some youth players. Huge churn, but apart from a couple of Bazou Toure's games for Ivory Coast at the world cup, I've not seen any of them play. Over 2 summers we've basically changed our entire team aside from the CBs.
    • I think the level of headliners Bloodstock get is varied    There's been bands who have gone on to play Download in quite a low spot like Meshuggah, Behemoth, Opeth etc.    Then they've had years like 2025 where you can argue that all three headliners are download main stage sub level    Knocked Loose right now i'd argue are 3rd down on main/opus headliner level while EC and FFDP are borderline main stage sub 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...