Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

Just now, NorthernSoul52 said:

Got to assume Billy Joel would have balked at the fee if approached too, which is a shame.

 

I mean it's not going to be him regardless, but I wouldn't have thought he'd be so fussed on the fee - the pedigree of the other acts that have done it wouldn't be lost on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Maybe we've been too hasty to write off Green Day.

Green Day are doing Download and they have paid a lot for exclusivity.

 

It was also announced this week that they are headlining Tinderbox on the Saturday of Glastonbury weekend and they are already booked to headline Tons of Rock on the Thursday and a show in Luxemburg on the Monday. They haven't done three shows in a row since pre Covid. Not happening.

Edited by RedJosh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RedJosh said:

Green Day are doing Download and they have paid a lot for exclusivity.

 

It was also announced this week that they are headlining Tinderbox on the Saturday of Glastonbury weekend.

 

Yeah - I'm aware of the main reasons for them being discounted (albeit not the 'paid a lot for exclusivity' element).  Just spitballin' other potential names in the frame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RedJosh said:

Green Day are doing Download and they have paid a lot for exclusivity.

 

It was also announced this week that they are headlining Tinderbox on the Saturday of Glastonbury weekend and they are already booked to headline Tons of Rock on the Thursday and a show in Luxemburg on the Monday. They haven't done three shows in a row since pre Covid. Not happening.

Until the Tinderbox announcement, I thought that the possibility of them doing this was increasing. But yeah, it's gone in the bin now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Well it also had The National, Two Door Cinema Club, Jimmy Eat World and Madness. As a sequence, it all sounded like fun.


‘‘Twas a heck of a day. Even if The National played to a small, disinterested crowd. Had Mark Thomas doing a set about his book walking the Israel-Palestine barrier in the morning too followed by Daniel Sloss and Tom Stade. 
 

Come to think of it, that was a brilliant day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, charlierc said:

The full-on Meet Me in the Bathroom slot eh

 

I wouldn't strictly be opposed to that tbf.

LCD secret slot on Hell Stage at 3am.

10 hours ago, fraybentos1 said:

Which year? We went in 2019 and it was an awful experience cause of the sound.

 

 

2023 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Superscally said:

The Strokes were off the chain good at All Points East. Apparently there were sound issues, but not where we were...

Same, immense where we were and excellent crowd. One of the best days of my life, a splendid 24 hours of debauchery and my first time seeing them after years of waiting!

 

[Edit: even if they didn't play Take it or Leave it, or Trying Your Luck🥲]

Edited by Stokesy10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, fraybentos1 said:

Which year? We went in 2019 and it was an awful experience cause of the sound.

 

 

 

One of the worst gigs I've been to, for the same reason.

 

I've had enough rants about that though, so I'll leave it there. Lytham the other year made up for it, that was special.

 

Would it kill them to do something outside of these sporadic $$$ dates though? 🥲

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mufcok said:

 

One of the worst gigs I've been to, for the same reason.

 

I've had enough rants about that though, so I'll leave it there. Lytham the other year made up for it, that was special.

 

Would it kill them to do something outside of these sporadic $$$ dates though? 🥲

All I remember about the strokes was they sounded OK and then Pulp came on and made them look extremely average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...