Headliners 2023

[FloorFiller]

Just now, Neil said:

the difference is that i found one believable and the other unbelievable, i have to apply thought about what people say, cos otherwise i'd be going along with any ols shite, as some appear to have done here.

‘Any old shite’ also known as ‘correct info that somebody else got months before I did’

[sisco]

6 minutes ago, Neil said:

its only info its believable.

No it’s only info if it’s accurate.

[Neil]

Just now, Freddyflintstonree said:

Or perhaps the difference is one came from you and one did not. 

did you believe kendrick was headlining last year before heas announced.

 

why was that?

[Crazyfool01]

Ok so the same info came from 2 sources and both are right … can we move on ffs please and thanks 

[sisco]

Just now, Crazyfool01 said:

Ok so the same info came from 2 sources and both are right … can we move on ffs please and thanks 

Some of us can mate. 

[Crazyfool01]

Just now, sisco said:

Some of us can mate. 

Indeed 😭

[FloorFiller]

1 minute ago, Crazyfool01 said:

Ok so the same info came from 2 sources and both are right … can we move on ffs please and thanks 

Yeah @Neil

[Hugh Jass II]

1 minute ago, FloorFiller said:

‘Any old shite’ also known as ‘correct info that somebody else got months before I did’

This is what it all boils to IMO.

The info was out there long before Neil got wind of it and he’s incredibly salty about that.

[Neil]

5 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

But again, that’s opinion presented as fact. Simply saying “that’s not believable” proves nothing.

 

the story was opinion presented as fact, plenty (you!) accepted that without question.

5 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

If you’re rejecting the idea that they went for GnR because other options were not available and/or said no then you must believe that GnR were the festival’s first choice, correct?

What is your take on why the festival booked GnR then?

my take is that they were the best option available, other bookings suggest other options were.

Edited March 2, 2023 by Neil
correcting typos

[Neil]

1 minute ago, Crazyfool01 said:

can we move on ffs please and thanks 

that for the likes of stuie troll. it must be sad to be so obsessed with me.

[Crazyfool01]

Just now, Neil said:

that for the likes of stuie troll. it must be sad to be so obsessed with me.

Stuie is a mate of mine … he’s not a troll as you put it !!! 

[Neil]

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass II said:

This is what it all boils to IMO.

The info was out there long before Neil got wind of it and he’s incredibly salty about that.

the info was only out there with those who accept an uncredulous story.

[Neil]

Just now, Crazyfool01 said:

Stuie is a mate of mine … he’s not a troll as you put it !!! 

all he does here is troll me.

[BenG92]

Just now, Neil said:

all he does here is troll me.

All you do here is troll everybody in this thread day in day out

[Crazyfool01]

Just now, Neil said:

all he does here is troll me.

Ok so he states things you don’t agree with … that’s not trolling  .

[Supernintendo Chalmers]

1 minute ago, Neil said:

that for the likes of stuie troll. it must be sad to be so obsessed with me.

There's a difference between a troll and someone who has a difference in opinion to you. He's a decent contributor to the site. 

[Hugh Jass II]

2 minutes ago, Neil said:

my take is that they were the best option available, other bookings suggest other options were.

See, now we are getting somewhere, a two way conversation where opinions are shared.

Who would you say if the acts touring and headlining festivals in 2023 would be better? Excluding the likes of Taylor, Beyoncé, Coldplay etc who have tour dates that rule them out.

This is not a question designed to trip you up or troll, genuinely curious to see who you’d suggest instead.

[Neil]

1 minute ago, BenG92 said:

All you do here is troll everybody in this thread day in day out

if those who are embarrassed about accepting a ridiculous story, and accept their credulity can move on, then i will too.

[roughbloke]

14 minutes ago, Neil said:

stuie are you embarrassed that you believed that story? you should be.

I think the last two pages just prove you will go out of your way to not acknowledge someone got (and continues to get) info before you. 
you don’t have to believe the backstory but it comes from a very good place. 

[Neil]

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass II said:

See, now we are getting somewhere, a two way conversation where opinions are shared.

Who would you say if the acts touring and headlining festivals in 2023 would be better? Excluding the likes of Taylor, Beyoncé, Coldplay etc who have tour dates that rule them out.

This is not a question designed to trip you up or troll, genuinely curious to see who you’d suggest instead.

i've given alternatives many times before. You'll probably find them in this thread.if people aren't listening wqhats the point of doing it again.

[stuie]

19 minutes ago, Neil said:

no coincidence, cos there hasn't been all the other times that source has given me info, you're just looking  to question my  take because you took in the other story without question.

 

 

I mean, hear me out for a second, is it not just possible that you got the same info?

[FloorFiller]

Just now, Neil said:

if those who are embarrassed about accepting a ridiculous story, and accept their credulity can move on, then i will too.

The story it came with is irrelevant, especially now that it’s proven to be true regardless.

FWIW, I think GnR were always lined up and it was in fact Elton who was brought in to replace Swift, hence his moved Paris date. GnR’s tour seems to have been arranged with Glastonbury always in mind, whereas we know that wasn’t the case with Elton. 

[roughbloke]

6 minutes ago, Neil said:

the info was only out there with those who accept an uncredulous story.

This honestly makes no sense. 

[Neil]

done with this now.

[Neil]

Just now, stuie said:

I mean, hear me out for a second, is it not just possible that you got the same info?

i didnt get the ridiculous story, so not the same info.