Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Ozanne said:

I don't know what some people expect. We are told it will be a very tough winter with tough restrictions in place throughout, with the Spring earmarked as when things can start to get better but some think we'll be seeing a loosening of restrictions by February. We are in this for the winter sadly.

To clarify, it is a member of the Cabinet who has intimated that loosening of restrictions could start at the end of February, best case scenario wise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ace56blaa said:

So my housemate went to his parents ( in same town ) for Xmas and now his stepdad has tested positive. 

It's pretty obvious to me how all this was gonna play out. Just sucks cause I spent Xmas alone to minimize risk n it doesn't even matter. 

Stay safe out there!

and you  .... I presume the app has pinged him ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mellotr0n said:

To clarify, it is a member of the Cabinet who has intimated that loosening of restrictions could start at the end of February, best case scenario wise. 

Cabinet members individually say a lot of things. If people expect restrictions to be loosened mid-winter they are going to be disappointed. Areas could go down a tier like they have done but overall we are in this position till the Spring regardless of how many they vaccinate. 

 

1 hour ago, zahidf said:

That's not a bad thing when it comes to vaccines. Too doom laden and people will just give up. Some hope and people will follow more to give time for vaccinations.

Anyway, FT says its MHRA source rather than a govt one 

Again with the baseless claims that people will stop follow the rules with no data to back this up.

Edited by Ozanne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mellotr0n said:

To clarify, it is a member of the Cabinet who has intimated that loosening of restrictions could start at the end of February, best case scenario wise. 

Is that where it comes from? That’s wildly optimistic. Probably about appeasement of backbenchers. Even though Labour won’t vote against them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

That's what I'm expecting too. I'm basically geared up for tier 4 until end of March with any reprieve a bonus.

This sounds more likely. Maybe a bit of relaxation in March as the days start getting longer but I’m geared up for more of this torture until the clocks go forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Again with the baseless claims that people will stop follow the rules with no data to back this up

do you not think that there will be some that who have had jabs that will be happier to be a bit more mobile then ?  Ive no data .... but I do think it will happen dependant on the tier situation .... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Cabinet members individually say a lot of things. If people expect restrictions to be loosened mid-winter they are going to be disappointed. Areas could go down a tier like they have done but overall we are in this position till the Spring regardless of how many they vaccinate. 

 

Again with the baseless claims that people will stop follow the rules with no data to back this up.

? Its human nature. I'm not sure what data you need? There are polls which says this lockdown is less followed than the first one. And any post vaccine will be less followed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same discussion basically goes round and round in this thread about when the restrictions will be relaxed. I think it boils down to much the same thing that it did in the first thread about coronavirus and Glastonbury: that some people find it easier to think positively and err on that side, and others prefer to prepare themselves for the worst and that way anything less is a bonus. I'm in the latter camp but I think it's quite an even split in here having followed this thread for some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ace56blaa said:

I haven't asked obviously mine won't ping till we get tested

I think that you dont get tested until you show symptoms ... and he is the only one that needs to isolate when the app pings him ... as his housemate you dont need to unless you show symptoms ... standing by to be corrected though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

This sounds more likely. Maybe a bit of relaxation in March as the days start getting longer but I’m geared up for more of this torture until the clocks go forward.

But its not a punishment. We should all be grateful if the govt locks us down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mellotr0n said:

To clarify, it is a member of the Cabinet who has intimated that loosening of restrictions could start at the end of February, best case scenario wise. 

That was on 5th December

The same member of the Cabinet as this one four days ago?

At the latest Downing Street press conference Hancock was asked if he thought the government was guilty of overpromising by suggesting the UK can return to normality by Easter.

The Tory minister said he was “highly confident we’ll get things back to normal by 2022” due to the coronavirus vaccine roll-out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zahidf said:

But its not a punishment. We should all be grateful if the govt locks us down

I didn't say we should be grateful, they are needed to stem the transmission of the virus. The fact that some on social media are peddling that these restrictions are a punishment is part of the problem. We should view them as a necessary tool to help us get in top of the virus and keep services running in the NHS. 

 

8 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

do you not think that there will be some that who have had jabs that will be happier to be a bit more mobile then ?  Ive no data .... but I do think it will happen dependant on the tier situation .... 

Yeah there might be some, but with the public messaging being that we still need to social distance etc for a while after having the vaccine then the majority will still do so because it's the right thing to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Copperface said:

That was on 5th December

The same member of the Cabinet as this one four days ago?

At the latest Downing Street press conference Hancock was asked if he thought the government was guilty of overpromising by suggesting the UK can return to normality by Easter.

The Tory minister said he was “highly confident we’ll get things back to normal by 2022” due to the coronavirus vaccine roll-out.

Do you genuinely think we will have restrictions until the end of next year and people will go along with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I didn't say we should be grateful, they are needed to stem the transmission of the virus. The fact that some on social media are peddling that these restrictions are a punishment is part of the problem. We should view them as a necessary tool to help us get in top of the virus and keep services running in the NHS. 

 

Yeah there might be some, but with the public messaging being that we still need to social distance etc for a while after having the vaccine then the majority will still do so because it's the right thing to do. 

Yeah that isn't the message politicians are giving and I dont think it is the right thing to do to mess up the economy or peoples employment one minute more than is absolutely necessary to stop multiple deaths.

Once the death rate and hospitalisation rates are massively down thanks to mass vaccination (hopefully by easter) then social distancing can get and stay in the bin as far as I am concerned.

Edited by zahidf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Do you genuinely think we will have restrictions until the end of next year and people will go along with it?

There will absolutely be restrictions until end of next year - whether people want to go along with it is irrelevant. Domestically we might be ok, but you will find that travel restrictions will still exist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Telegraph says - "Ministers are looking at proposals to triple the length of time between taking a first and second dose from three weeks to 12 weeks, in order to speed up the delivery of the vaccine."

Aside from the very dodgy maths there, why the hell should Ministers even have input on that? It should be a medical decision and should be left for medical people to decide based on facts. Politicians should shut the fuck up on aspects like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MrBarry465 said:

There will absolutely be restrictions until end of next year - whether people want to go along with it is irrelevant. Domestically we might be ok, but you will find that travel restrictions will still exist. 

I dont even think that tbh. Tourism is too important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MEGABOWL said:

There’s going to be some fabulous psychology studies done about human behaviour in this Pandemic

Ha on both ends!

 

I'm no lockdown sceptic. I acknowledge the need for it when we need to control things. I'm just amazed that some people seem to want it past a point when restrictions will be worse than covid past mass vaccinations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...