Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

I think it's fine to be sceptical about the safety of these vaccines considering how quickly they've been produced.

Of course it is when it's based on facts (or even lack of facts) - but it's a problem is that too often bullshit and scare stories get mixed in.

I remember that a few days after the first trial of the Oxford vaccine started, some arsewpe on Twitter or wherever started falsely claiming that the first recipient had died and it got a repeated loads before a correction was put out. There's probably people out there that still believe it happened and will base their decisions on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, zahidf said:

LETS GO DOWN TO THE FOOTIE

 

 

 

I assume any of these events either outdoors or indoors still needs people to be seated?

Surely we aren't going head first in to music gigs with pits and so on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

The South East, which is where I live currently have the highest rates in England at 631.7 cases per 100k.

Bugger. Really? 

I live just down the road from you - Rustington, work in Arundel and used to work/live in Worthing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

Yeah, public need reassuring somehow....although I'm sure most will take it in the end.

I bet most of the anti-vaxxers will end up secretly taking it even, when they remember that people have died from it or put on ventilators.

For all their mouthyness, in my experience these sorts of people are cowards at heart and certainly don't have a problem with hypocrisy.

Edited by xxialac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mellotr0n said:

Bugger. Really? 

I live just down the road from you - Rustington, work in Arundel and used to work/live in Worthing.

Yeah that’s from The Guardian.

Small world hey. I think Worthing itself has low numbers but in general it’s not good to hear we are the highest!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, xxialac said:

They're going to have to rename that surely!

Just Googled it to stick the date in my diary and they appear to be sticking with 2020! It's prob cos they still want to market it as the 60th anniversary (it's why they are hosting it all over Europe this time - they really timed that well!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Homer said:

Just Googled it to stick the date in my diary and they appear to be sticking with 2020! It's prob cos they still want to market it as the 60th anniversary (it's why they are hosting it all over Europe this time - they really timed that well!).

I've heard it's also that all the branding has been sorted (all the memorabilia/tat as well no doubt) so don't want to sort all of that again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Homer said:

Just Googled it to stick the date in my diary and they appear to be sticking with 2020! It's prob cos they still want to market it as the 60th anniversary (it's why they are hosting it all over Europe this time - they really timed that well!).

Primavera Sound announced their 20th anniversary for this year with the strapline "2020 Vision".

Turns out they didn't have any!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, incident said:

50% capacity indoors prior to a vaccine is mental surely?

Though admittedly I can't think of anything it applies to other than Basketball (Hockey decided to skip the season) so it'll be fairly tiny numbers overall.

Darts? That’s coming up next month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jparx said:

Darts? That’s coming up next month.

I got free tickets to Ally Pally a few years ago so went along to see what all the hype is about. Slowly dawned on me that it really is just a load of people sitting around watching two men playing darts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...