Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, jparx said:

Courtney is the best. Missed on the Pyramid last year, but caught the second half of the William's Green set and it was mega.

Sound on Pyramid for Courtney was crappy - ironically since immediately before her it was stellar for The Unthanks. As a result, her Williams Green set was much better. It was, in fact,  belter!

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

8 hours ago, Hugh Jass said:

I've just hammered out a compromise deal with Mrs Jass where Adele is exchanged for me getting first choice for pretty much the rest of the festival.

Any woman who strikes a deal where upon her fella has to watch Adele above New Order needs trading in for a newer model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, eastynh said:

Any woman who strikes a deal where upon her fella has to watch Adele above New Order needs trading in for a newer model.

Any man who doesn't have the balls to say, "You go and see Adele, I'll go and see something else," doesn't deserve a "newer model".

Honestly couples / groups who feel the need to do Glastonbury in each other's pockets freak me out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ICGenie said:

Any man who doesn't have the balls to say, "You go and see Adele, I'll go and see something else," doesn't deserve a "newer model".

Honestly couples / groups who feel the need to do Glastonbury in each other's pockets freak me out...

Hahah I thought I was going to get a telling off then, for telling Hugh to trade his missus in.

To be fair the old romantic in me thinks it is quite cute Hugh will watch Adele with his missus. The problem is that there is a time for cute and compromise and it is certainly not when New Order are on :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/03/2016 at 11:04 PM, jparx said:

Sorry, couldn't get rid of quote box.

4 minutes ago, ICGenie said:

Any man who doesn't have the balls to say, "You go and see Adele, I'll go and see something else," doesn't deserve a "newer model".

Honestly couples / groups who feel the need to do Glastonbury in each other's pockets freak me out...

...

There has to be balance though. You can't just abandon your wife all weekend.

In 2007, watching Killers was my line I would not cross. I saw Africa Express instead. Result!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's stopping a poster reveal by Glastonbury? The headliners are the ones the press are bothered about - so it wont create that much press any more.

Is it to keep us speculating? (I hope so, if I was EE I'd love winding people up)

Is it contractual? I.e. They set a date with promoters.

Is it because they are just not finished?

Is it cos they can't be arsed yet?

On the face of it, they could do it now - but my knowledge of these things is limited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LeeGalvin said:

Yeah, I think some compromise is important. I bloody love my wife and want to spend Glastonbury with her, not apart. 

Aww, how cute.

Thank god you're not my husband...

Don't get me wrong, I love spending some time with my husband at Glastonbury.  But I'd feel like a proper shit forcing him to watch something I know he won't enjoy, and where I know he'd rather watch something else.  And I then wouldn't enjoy it because I'd know he wasn't enjoying it.

I'm not suggesting couples should spend the entire festival apart.  Just that when you want to watch different things, it's perfectly OK to spend a couple of hours watching different things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LeeGalvin said:

Yeah, I think some compromise is important. I bloody love my wife and want to spend Glastonbury with her, not apart. 

Totally agree...especially if it's just the 2 of you there.

That said being able to bimble off on your own for a while at Glastonbury is also very liberating.  In 2013 Mrs Parson didn't fancy the crush for the Stones so we agreed to meet after.....her eclectic mix of Steve Winwood,  Chase & Status and Public Enemy still promotes more conversation than my time with Mick and his buddies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Perhaps, like a lot of people, she's seen New Order before and has no urgent desire to repeat the experience. 

Thats like saying you tried Rice Pudding with jam in it and have no desire to try it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Orgazoid said:

Rice pudding is absolutey vile. 

Smite the heathen.

Just now, CaledonianGonzo said:

I'd probably refuse to keep eating the rice pudding of a chef who's never shown any aptitude for making it well.

That I except. If the chef is bobbins, then find a better Chef.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

I'd probably refuse to keep eating the rice pudding of a chef who's never shown any aptitude for making it well.

Its all Ambrosia mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...