Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Muse


eldest300

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Bands aren't talked about as much when they're not touring, releasing music or doing anything notable. That's not out of the ordinary and it's not really the act getting smaller.

I'd agree with you to a certain extent, however some massive bands like foo fighters, arctic monkeys, coldplay have their fans talking about them whether they are touring or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd agree with you to a certain extent, however some massive bands like foo fighters, arctic monkeys, coldplay have their fans talking about them whether they are touring or not.

i'm pretty sure Muse fall in to that ballpark too - here we are, talking about them, with an album that could be a good year away. same with small bands. just because you're not personally hearing about a band doesn't mean that their fans aren't talking about them

(also, the bands you mentioned have never been more than a year or two away from releasing a new album after a tour has ended - even Foos with their many 'hiatuses')

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are people talking about Arctics now as much as they were a year ago? Were people talking about Foos as much a year ago as they are now?

Anyway Muse have a huge diehard fanbase but their more casual one is diminishing as. The years go by so their popularity is naturally waning. Doesn't really matter though as they'll never drop off significantly now but it may make them a less appealing booking eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd agree with you to a certain extent, however some massive bands like foo fighters, arctic monkeys, coldplay have their fans talking about them whether they are touring or not.

You have a strange view of the world...

Anyway it depends on the act, the more mainstream/bigger an act is the more casual fans they will have, the more they will seeminly be talked about. Coldplay are a great example there, as everyone knows Coldplay and Chris Martin has more of a celeb/gossip status outside of the band. Dave Grohl does to an extent too but with a slightly less mainstream/radio 2 listeners crowd.

Where as Muse are pretty much known for doing their music and thats it, so when they haven't got a new album out/tour obviously people talk less about them.

Edited by LondonTom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Few people have mentioned kings of leon in this thread. Would argue muse and kings of leon are both in a similar position, both have hit the stadium level, are now focusing on the fan base they have, rather than trying to win over more people. Naturally, with that, some of the fair weather fans will drop off, but both bands are still a big deal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I would agree to an extent that Muse are defo planning on making an album "for the fans" with the next one...which demographic and what you define as a Muse "fan" is open for debate.

I was listening to some YouTube 'covers' last night which really got me excited again.If anyone hasn't then check out a channel called 'vkgoeswild' and her muse covers.I totally love them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Few people have mentioned kings of leon in this thread. Would argue muse and kings of leon are both in a similar position, both have hit the stadium level, are now focusing on the fan base they have, rather than trying to win over more people. Naturally, with that, some of the fair weather fans will drop off, but both bands are still a big deal!

Have you listened to the 2nd law? Clearly wasn't made with keeping the current Muse fans happy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion Muse's peak was 2010. Although The Resistance was a much poorer album than the previous two, they were unquestionably the biggest festival headliner that year.

I think they have declined slightly since then. Their olympic song went down like a led balloon and after 2nd law it seemed like they suffered a slight identity crisis.

That being said, they are still festival headliners and they could still easily get a number one album regardless of quality. I think they will remain that way for at least another 4 or 5 years before they start properly declining

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion Muse's peak was 2010. Although The Resistance was a much poorer album than the previous two, they were unquestionably the biggest festival headliner that year.

I think they have declined slightly since then. Their olympic song went down like a led balloon and after 2nd law it seemed like they suffered a slight identity crisis.

That being said, they are still festival headliners and they could still easily get a number one album regardless of quality. I think they will remain that way for at least another 4 or 5 years before they start properly declining

Muse bigger than Stevie wonder? Huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Muse bigger than Stevie wonder? Huh?

weirdly i remember seeing people question Stevie Wonder being the headliner in 2010. can't remember if it was on this forum or another but i definitely remember seeing a fair few people wondering why he was on the top of the bill and not in the legends slot

(not that this means anything as he was clearly a huge headliner and these people were clearly morons. just sayin')

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm? Dom from muse put this as his instagram bio

http://instagram.com/domhoward77

"domhoward77 7 day countdown to album number 7 http://muse.mu"

I'd guess just going into the studio, or since its linked the site, the start of the marketing push so might be a date annoucement.

But we can hope it will suddenly drop :D (As I believe the terminology is these days :P)

weirdly i remember seeing people question Stevie Wonder being the headliner in 2010. can't remember if it was on this forum or another but i definitely remember seeing a fair few people wondering why he was on the top of the bill and not in the legends slot

(not that this means anything as he was clearly a huge headliner and these people were clearly morons. just sayin')

Yep very true, lots of people suggested the legends slot would be a better place for him on here and to be fair, I think even though he smashed it, I doubt the crowd would have been as big if you had a bigger acts on the other stages. (If I remember rightly it was Orbital and Ash on the Other/John Peel?). I doubt Stevie could do sell out 3 UK stadium daates on top of 2 festivals in one summer :P

Though I'd say U2 would have been the biggest headliners if they had played, I remember Q billing as sort of titans of stadium rock going head to head before they pulled out :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I'm surprised Incubus are that high up, could get moved down with new bands being announced. Quality band but thought they were boring years ago.

surprisingly still pretty big in a lot of places. reckon they'll stick as a sub. looking forward to their new album even though their last was pretty awful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

surprisingly still pretty big in a lot of places. reckon they'll stick as a sub. looking forward to their new album even though their last was pretty awful

I was so looking forward to taking an ex to go see them as she really wasn't interested in much of the line up but we both just sat there bored & got drunk at Reading. It was dull, must have had a new album out I wasn't aware of.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...