Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

kasabian play more festivals and concerts to be more well known from

year to year. if the stone roses would do a tour through germany,

they would onla play in locations beetween 1000 - 2000 people.

Whats that got to do with the price of fish? Depeche Mode sell out football stadiums in Germany and sell millions of records, should they headline above the Roses at Glastonbury?

The Roses in the last few years have probably sold more tickets than any other British band for gigs in the UK. Sold out Heaton Park, Finsbury Park, Glasgow and headlined multiple festivals, yet they are not popular enough to headline Glastonbury as they are not big in Germany?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with the second coming that made it hard to love is when it's bad, it's really f*cking bad. See for example the first 5 minutes of breaking into heaven.

I do like your Star will Shine though, would probably have that in my top 5 Roses tunes even.

Yeah, not to mention the closing track.

I stuck it on for the first time in years a few weeks back. There are some good moments, but few good songs. It seems to be better loved these days than it was when it came out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Headlined Pukkelpop in '12. Were abysmal. Half the crowd had left after half an hour. Don't get the love for them at all.

The love of them is due to an absolutely fantastic debut album that has stood the test of time. (oh and fools Gold)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, not to mention the closing track.

I stuck it on for the first time in years a few weeks back. There are some good moments, but few good songs. It seems to be better loved these days than it was when it came out.

Didn't even want to mention The foz mate, I'd made an effort to try and completely forget that one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats that got to do with the price of fish? Depeche Mode sell out football stadiums in Germany and sell millions of records, should they headline above the Roses at Glastonbury?

The Roses in the last few years have probably sold more tickets than any other British band for gigs in the UK. Sold out Heaton Park, Finsbury Park, Glasgow and headlined multiple festivals, yet they are not popular enough to headline Glastonbury as they are not big in Germany?

Ironically, for you and me, easy, we wish the answer to this question was yes!

DM are one of the very few bands that would get me to watch a headliner at the Pyramid Stage this year!

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kasabian play more festivals and concerts to be more well known from

year to year. if the stone roses would do a tour through germany,

they would onla play in locations beetween 1000 - 2000 people.

Is David hasselhof still selling out stadiums in Germany?

It's hardly surprising credible bands don't sell many tickets over there is it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with the second coming that made it hard to love is when it's bad, it's really f*cking bad. See for example the first 5 minutes of breaking into heaven.

I do like your Star will Shine though, would probably have that in my top 5 Roses tunes even.

philistine!

i always liked the beginning of that record, that first five minutes just makes that opening drum break even sweeter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The love of them is due to an absolutely fantastic debut album that has stood the test of time. (oh and fools Gold)

I get that people adore that album but it's not universally loved, certainly not in the way the first two Oasis albums are. I'm 30 and my group of friends are very music orientated, but none of us have any time for them at all. I can only think of one person who is particularly into them. I dunno, maybe if i'd been into it at the time but listening to them now leaves me cold.

Each to their own though. I have no problem with them playing if they can pull a decent crowd. Just not convinced they can. There'll be many other things for me to do. 2 Pyramid headliners that tick my boxes is enough for one year

Edited by pea tear griffin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

philistine!

i always liked the beginning of that record, that first five minutes just makes that opening drum break even sweeter.

Nah, 5 minute intros just stink of a band/producer trying to pad out an album that doesn't have enough material. See the entire recorded works of Tears for fears for further examples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironically, for you and me, easy, we wish the answer to this question was yes!

DM are one of the very few bands that would get me to watch a headliner at the Pyramid Stage this year!

Ben

Its a strange one this as you are correct, from a selfish and personal viewpoint I would rather DM. But I have seen the Roses and DM numerous times. Nothing comes close to how good the Roses were on the Saturday at Heaton Park. I think DM would be great at Glasto but if the Roses could replicate that Heaton Park gig, there would be nothing that could touch them. There seems to be a lot of us on here who went to Heaton Park so you know exactly what I am on about. Have never seen grown Mancunian men get emotional at a concert before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people are too quick to dismiss the Second Coming on the back of the reviews it received. People pan it now without taking into the consideration the context at the time and why it seemed to get such bad reviews.

The media was very quick to stick a knife into all things Madchester after the way the scene supposedly imploded. The Mondays had blew up in a haze of bad drugs, homophobic comments and poor decisions, Factory went bump, the Hacienda was clogged down in extreme violence and gangland behaviour. The media at the time loved sticking the knife in. The Roses did not help themselves. Fights with record label, 5 years to release the Second Coming and internal arguments within the band. Plus the media has their new Mancunian darlings in Oasis, who managed to steal the thunder of their idols by producing a classic equally as good as the Roses debut.

The Roses were on a hiding to nothing. If they had produced an album full of Ten Story Love Songs, they would have been panned for not progressing. Instead they produced a Led Zep influenced rocker. The problem was that Oasis had produced something better and were better copy.

The Second Coming has a whole host of fantastic tunes. No it is nowhere near as good as the debut, but then again not many albums are. But it is far better than most of the derogatory reviews it received.

It is funny how things happen in cycles. Yes Please by the Mondays was derided and that is not a bad album. A few years later the media were right behind the rise of Black Grape. Same with the Roses. the shit they got after Squire quit and they played Reading was very harsh. Yet a few years later the media were giving great reviews to Ian Browns debut solo album and The Seahorses album. Yet neither of these albums are anywhere near as good as The Second Coming.

Importantly, the musical landscape had already dramatically changed with the advent of grunge and Britpop as a reaction to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that people adore that album but it's not universally loved, certainly not in the way the first two Oasis albums are. I'm 30 and my group of friends are very music orientated, but none of us have any time for them at all. I can only think of one person who is particularly into them. I dunno, maybe if i'd been into it at the time but listening to them now leaves me cold.

Each to their own though. I have no problem with them playing if they can pull a decent crowd. Just not convinced they can. There'll be many other things for me to do. 2 Pyramid headliners that tick my boxes is enough for one year

I love Oasis as well so appreciate what you are saying. I have friends around your age and they don't get the Roses which I find a bit strange as they would have been constantly exposed to them while growing up round here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, 5 minute intros just stink of a band/producer trying to pad out an album that doesn't have enough material. See the entire recorded works of Tears for fears for further examples.

if it's all the same mate, i'll pass.

and i still like the opening to second coming!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that people adore that album but it's not universally loved, certainly not in the way the first two Oasis albums are. I'm 30 and my group of friends are very music orientated, but none of us have any time for them at all. I can only think of one person who is particularly into them. I dunno, maybe if i'd been into it at the time but listening to them now leaves me cold.

Each to their own though. I have no problem with them playing if they can pull a decent crowd. Just not convinced they can. There'll be many other things for me to do. 2 Pyramid headliners that tick my boxes is enough for one year

'not universally loved' - fair enough

'the way the first two oasis albums are' - they aren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Importantly, the musical landscape had already dramatically changed with the advent of grunge and Britpop as a reaction to that.

Grunge never really gained much of a foothold in Manchester. It was more of a student thing. Manchester seemed to carry on progressing down the electronic and dance avenues.

Heavier rock type music has always been on the fringes here.

I agree though, the landscape had changed and the Roses did not keep up. They did exactly the same as Primal Scream really. Both bands created seminal pieces and then for some reason went all Led Zep on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seems to be a lot of us on here who went to Heaton Park so you know exactly what I am on about. Have never seen grown Mancunian men get emotional at a concert before.

I was there on the Friday and can confirm it was incredible. The best atmosphere I've experienced at a gig. The band were tight as anything. Reni was in a full groove.

That atmosphere wouldn't be replicated on the pyramid though. Brown's vocals didn't matter at Heaton Park. I think they would at Glastonbury

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seems to be a lot of us on here who went to Heaton Park so you know exactly what I am on about. Have never seen grown Mancunian men get emotional at a concert before.

I was there on the Friday and can confirm it was incredible. The best atmosphere I've experienced at a gig. The band were tight as anything. Reni was in a full groove.

That atmosphere wouldn't be replicated on the pyramid though. Brown's vocals didn't matter at Heaton Park. I think they would at Glastonbury

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...