Celery
-
Posts
401 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by Celery
-
Incubus would be a nice addition though 3 nights on the bounce probably a bit much.
-
-
Everything Everything 🤞
-
You're changing your argument now, presumably because you know it is rubbish. 5 trophies in 4years is 'nowhere' according to you. You also have to go back to the 30s and 40s to find 'decades' without a trophy. Another myth busted. Any more ill-informed 'facts' you need me to correct?
-
So sad. Didn't see much of him at the bridge but seemed a well-liked guy.
-
And? So you're saying that winning 5 trophies in 4yrs is nowhere? Yes or no?
-
Wrong. Chelsea won loads of trophies in that period. Spurs have won sod all for 15yrs. Did I really have to explain that?
-
So you're saying your claim that we were 'nowhere' before Roman was false? And on the contender front, I suggest you remind yourself of the 99 or 2000 title race. Wrong again.
-
So, just to confirm, you are saying that 5 major trophies in 4yrs is not challenging for trophies?
-
Whoosh! Totally missed the point there Neil. No, we're not friends. That was an expression referencing your familiar habit of changing the subject rather than showing backbone and admitting an error. You wanna return to the original discussion or keep avoiding?
-
Aha, we're onto the 'desperately change the subject so I don't have to admit I was wrong' part of the Neil argument. Hello old friend
-
I'm not going to agree because it's wrong. 5 major trophies between 1997 and 2000 proves you wrong. Because we won trophies under Bates? Remember Jan '97? Liverpool 2-0 up at the Bridge against us. Bottled it and lost 4-2. We won the cup that year...
-
Irrelevant. Roman came early 2000s. You've edited out 2 decades from history 😂
-
No one said it was
-
It's not the best I can offer. I mentioned trophies which you've chosen to totally ignore. You're only seeing what you want to see. This is laughable. I've clearly showed you were talking BS yet you can't just hold your hands up like a normal person. Nothing changes with you.
-
So you're saying that to be somewhere, you have to win a trophy against Barca? That's an odd claim to say the least. Easier to just say you were wrong but I know that doesn't come easy to you.
-
Nope. Didn't under Roman either.
-
https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/match/63651--chelsea-vs-barcelona/ Try again. Best atmosphere I've ever experienced at that game. You're also ignoring all the trophies in the 90s.
-
Barca? That's fair. Only one league and a cup with an unbelievable squad. But anyway, the point of this was to show that Chelsea were a competitive club before Roman. Obviously he elevated them to new heights but they were probably the 3rd or 4th best English club in the 7-8yrs prior to his arrival.
-
Except for FA cups, league cups & European trophies. Beat an incredible Barca team in the CL in 2000.
-
Behave
