Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

all this because of somebody taking the piss about the lineup being released with the 1000th page :D

It is incredible though that it's got to 1000 pages and we have not a clue who the final headliner is going to be. Not even a little bit of an idea. I can't decide if I love it or really bloody hate it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

It is incredible though that it's got to 1000 pages and we have not a clue who the final headliner is going to be. Not even a little bit of an idea. I can't decide if I love it or really bloody hate it

I think one of us has guessed already

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think one of us has guessed already

almost 100% certainty that they've been brought up at least fifty times already in this thread. just not used to it being this late on and there still being a few possible candidates for it (even if some are more outlandish than others)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we're passing the time for Glastonbury 2014 to start, maybe I thought it'd be a good time to start up a thread discussing who'd headline next year.

I saw that last year Arcade Fire were a strong prediction to headline very early on. And it turned out happening

Wonder whether there are any bands we predict are almost definitely set to headline next year's festival.

I'm gonna go and make a prediction myself which could well be completely and utterly wrong

Foo Fighters, Radiohead, Florence + the Machine

Let's hear everyone else's!

Change Radiohead or Foo Fighters for Fleetwood Mac and you've got my bet. Foos will probably do Glasto in 2016 on the end of their tour of the new album.

Florence & the Machine, Fleetwood Mac, Kanye West

Fleetwood Mac, Radiohead, Kanye West

Fleetwood Mac is the only one i'd put any money on. the other two are just wishful thinking

Fleetwood Mac, Foo Fighters, Florence + The Machine

the three F's next year.

If Not Foos, Radiohead. Got a gut feeling that the foos want to do glasto with the next album.

If the 1st page is anything to go by its Fleetwood, Flo or Radiohead

Simples...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say it but I think today is unlikely being that they posted info about volunteering an hour or two ago. When they release the lineup if I remember correctly they turn the whole website into just the lineup page for a day or so. Why post other news just to have it not accessible on the website/overshadowed by the lineup announcement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 1st page is anything to go by its Fleetwood, Flo or Radiohead

Simples...

Love how the first page is more rational and constructive, a full year before the festival and many months before the line-up release and, now, with hours days or at the very most weeks until the line-up we have descended into complete madness.

and I'm contributing with various AD gifs that capture how i feel:

200.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 1st page is anything to go by its Fleetwood, Flo or Radiohead

Simples...

thank christ nobody was taking bets otherwise i would've squandered a LOT of money on Fleetwood Mac (or maybe they were and the odds were just shite)

only reason nobody was predicting Prince was because Eavis downright denied that one of the headliners he had lined up was him. son of a...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got that and for a brief second I was very, very excited.

Now the ###### account is at it! It's like one big joke that efestivals users are excluded from!

edit: should have realised that the name of that rival forum would be a banned word on here, oops

Edited by Zac Quinn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say it but I think today is unlikely being that they posted info about volunteering an hour or two ago. When they release the lineup if I remember correctly they turn the whole website into just the lineup page for a day or so. Why post other news just to have it not accessible on the website/overshadowed by the lineup announcement.

yeah i agree - when i saw they'd posted something else today my hopes of the lineup being released quickly diminished. reckon it's gonna be next week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now the ###### account is at it! It's like one big joke that efestivals users are excluded from!

edit: should have realised that the name of that rival forum would be a banned word on here, oops

Can I ask who the rival forum is..? I honesty have no clue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...