Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Wishlist

Friday

Main: Foo Fighters subbed by Rise Against

Other: Paul Weller subbed by Johnny Marr

Saturday

Main: Anthrax or Megadeth subbed by Lamb of God and Bullet for My Valentine

Other: Of Monsters and Men subbed by Pollaponk

Sunday

Main: Keane subbed by The Killers

Other: Emile Sande subbed by Jesse Glynn

Realistic Prediction

Pyramid Stage: Fleetwood Mac, Foo Fighters, The Killers

Other Stage: Lady Gaga, Foster the People, Emile Sande

(bar Fleetwood Mac these are all dependent on a new album in Autum/Winter)

Edited by crazyguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wishlist

Friday

Main: Foo Fighters subbed by Rise Against

Other: Paul Weller subbed by Johnny Marr

Saturday

Main: Anthrax or Megadeth subbed by Lamb of God and Bullet for My Valentine

Other: Of Monsters and Men subbed by Pollaponk

Sunday

Main: Keane subbed by The Killers

Other: Emile Sande subbed by Jesse Glynn

Realistic Prediction

Pyramid Stage: Fleetwood Mac, Foo Fighters, The Killers

Other Stage: Lady Gaga, Foster the People, Emile Sande

(bar Fleetwood Mac these are all dependent on a new album in Autum/Winter)

Crazy by name crazy by nature. Keane headlining glasto? Respect that you're obviously a fan but seriously?

Love yer Friday line up tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crazy by name crazy by nature. Keane headlining glasto? Respect that you're obviously a fan but seriously?

Love yer Friday line up tho.

It wouldn't be the most out there choice ever, maybe not the Sunday night but I could easily see Keane doing a headline slot at Glastonbury. There albums have all reached No. 1 in the UK for crying out loud. There songs are pretty widely known and I could easily see the stuff from Sovereign Light Cafe being played to a roaring crowd at Glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Friday:

Main: Biffy Clyro, Foals

Other: Bastille, Rita Ora

Saturday:

Main: Radiohead, Florence & the Machine

Other: Tinie Tempah, Knife Party

Sunday:

Main: Fleetwood Mac, Two Door Cinema Club

Other: The Prodigy, The Vaccines

Edited by 01seb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are The Stone Roses not getting a mention?

A New album is rumoured to be due out in 2015.

IMHO because it seems more likely they'll have split up or still be working on that new album/doing nothing than actually be touring a new album. It's the Roses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Friday pyramid: Radiohead, Bjork

Friday Other: The Vaccines, Two Door Cinema Club

Saturday Pyramid: Fleetwood Mac, Morissey
Saturday Other: Disclosure, Bastille

Sunday Pyramid: Florence + The Machine, Calvin feckin harris'
Sunday Other: Biffy Clyro, Chvrches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wouldn't be the most out there choice ever, maybe not the Sunday night but I could easily see Keane doing a headline slot at Glastonbury. There albums have all reached No. 1 in the UK for crying out loud. There songs are pretty widely known and I could easily see the stuff from Sovereign Light Cafe being played to a roaring crowd at Glastonbury.

Just stop, it's becoming ridiculous.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eavis said: "We've got three headliners already – and that's without Prince. We've got some good headliners. We had an agent [for a band] yesterday on the platform by the stage watching Metallica with me, saying 'My band want to do it next year'. I can't tell you who it was but that was done on the platform watching Metallica. It it a British artist? He's definitely British, but the band are not British any more. "

http://www.nme.com/news/dolly-parton/78205#1wUYLrWRDTg0wYxi.99

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eavis said: "We've got three headliners already – and that's without Prince. We've got some good headliners. We had an agent [for a band] yesterday on the platform by the stage watching Metallica with me, saying 'My band want to do it next year'. I can't tell you who it was but that was done on the platform watching Metallica. It it a British artist? He's definitely British, but the band are not British any more. "

http://www.nme.com/news/dolly-parton/78205#1wUYLrWRDTg0wYxi.99

A clue like that is easy to solve, anyone who was on the pyramid that time could leak it.

That sounds like FM to me. Think they're nailed on. I think Radiohead has got to be strong possibility too with new album very likely sometime in the next year

I was thinking radiohead too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't quite get the quote though? It's confusing

I hope Fleetwood Mac works out though, they were at this "pretty much booked" stage for about 2 Glastonbury's now!

Really want Radiohead too, as I said earlier I reckon it'l be Florence or Foos as the final headliner. Most likely florence i'l assume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hang on its AC/DC ;-)

I suppose most of them are technically British to be fair. Would be a bit weird to have heavy metal two years in a row though.

Just stop, it's becoming ridiculous.

What exactly is wrong with a 4 time number one album band with a back catalogue of great songs headlining Glastonbury? There are a British band as well, I could easily see them drawing 60-75k regardless of who's on The Other Stage, which would be better than the 90k watching Metallica last night from an organisational logistics point of view.

Either that or I'd like to see R.E.M reform to headline it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...