Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Lineup 2014


Hawky

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • dentalplan

    4030

  • Gucci Piggy

    3804

  • Com Truise

    2920

  • the wonderwhy

    2489

Biffy also had a 2 hour set.

The Cure had 2h30, and spent longer on stage than Foos did.

GnR didn't get that much longer.

The pattern is that they typically agree to the request of headliners if they want a longer set. It's unlikely Arctics will request this.

Didn't Biffy only have 90 minutes? And yeah The Cure had 2 hours and 30 but Foo Fighters were scheduled for 3 hours. GNR had two hours but turned up late so only played about an hour long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel at this point the main stage lineup is based way more on who's actually available to play each day rather than trying to theme them particularly. For years now it's been so muddled you have to put in loads of caveats and exceptions to define a day as 'heavy' or 'not heavy'.

And Biffy did only get 90 minutes. Which was for the best - I'm not convinced they'd be the universally accepted major festival headliners they are now without that set going down so well, and playing so few early songs most people don't know contributed to that (as much as I missed Jaggy Snake etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole 'heavier day' and 'longer than 90-minute headliner' are archaic theories and outdated cliches that died a few years ago. All three headliners got longer than 90-minutes in 2012 fer chrissakes. Of course one day will look 'heavier' than the others to someone, it's bound too unless all three days have exactly the same goddam bands, but what is heavy to one is different to another. To their credit over the last few years the organisers have been a lot more fluid and flexible with the structures were previously thought to exist, so still trying to fit acts and bands into the 'longer than 90-minute headliner role' (and arguing whether they're suitable for such a role) or 'the heavier day' or arguing that either still even exist is fucking retarded. It's nonsensical over-analysis, the organisers have shown that they can and will do whatever they want regarding set times. It's not like the old days where every day had the same amount of acts and those acts had the same set times (hence the longer or shorter headliner sets and the assumption that only certain acts deserving/suiting them being nonsense), all through the line-up there are variations now on all stages. Just go with it.

Edited by mrtourette
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole 'heavier day' and 'longer than 90-minute headliner' are archaic theories and outdated cliches that died a few years ago. All three headliners got longer than 90-minutes in 2012 fer chrissakes. Of course one day will look 'heavier' than the others to someone, it's bound too unless all three days have exactly the same goddam bands, but what is heavy to one is different to another. To their credit over the last few years the organisers have been a lot more fluid and flexible with the structures were previously thought to exist, so still trying to fit acts and bands into the 'longer than 90-minute headliner role' (and arguing whether they're suitable for such a role) or 'the heavier day' or arguing that either still even exist is fucking retarded. It's nonsensical over-analysis, the organisers have shown that they can and will do whatever they want regarding set times. It's not like the old days where every day had the same amount of acts and those acts had the same set times, all through the line-up there are variations now on all stages. Just go with it.

That's what she said
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do the still put a fake band or Chelsea player on the line up anymore?

Nope, I don't think so. The booker who used to do that left last year (or maybe this year I forgotten but either way, he isn't with the festival anymore)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Alkaline Trio 90 Barrington Levy 80 Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 100 Billy Ocean 100 The Black Keys 70  Carl Cox 100 Chase & Status 120 Chelsea Wolfe 80 CMAT 135  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 Disclosure 60 Everything Everything 110 Faithless 90 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130 Garbage 100 GOAT 105 Greentea Peng 120 Happy Mondays 70 Hollie Cook 90 Jorja Smith 100 José González 100 Joy Crookes 120 Judas Priest 70 Kasabian 60 Kneecap 120  Levellers 85 Linkin Park 90 Lorde 120 Madness 75 The Maccabees 100 Neck Deep 135 Nile Rodgers & Chic 100 Overmono 100 Pixies 15 (-10) The Prodigy 140 Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 100 Ren 45  Richard Ashcroft 100 Say She She 75 Scissor Sisters 120 Self Esteem 120 Skunk Anansie 100 Stereolab 120 The Streets 110 Super Furry Animals 110 Tems 10 Thundercat 90 Tom Jones 40  Tyler, the Creator 60 Underworld 115 Wet Leg 90 Wilco 85  The Wombats 80 Wolf Alice 140
    • I too am always a bit blurred on what/who constitutes a legend slot but would Sting fit that bill?  Those there said his IoW slot was v good and he has enough of a songbook imo for a Sun afternoon if he uses the Police's 1st 2 albums for a fair chunk of it      
    • Thing is, I'd have said that as well.   But then she inexplicably ended up on the Wilderness lineup and that changes everything. I reckon if that goes well, which it will, then she's very much in the picture.
    • This has probably been discussed a hundred times already on efests but what constitutes a legend? I know some of it is my age but I don't see eurithmics or Duran Duran as legend status. Neil young or nils lofgren then yes and neither of them have overly troubled the charts. Duran Duran and indeed the eurithmics I would put in the 80s category and whilst it would be ok (human league at isle of wight we're fabulous) they just arent in my mind legend status.  Zombies played same festival- i would take that. 
    • friendly tonight delayed , pitch draining pretty quick to be fair .... not sure it bodes well for other games with potential fixture backlog 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...