Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2013 Headliners


Guest shangri-la_steward

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin
Seeing as Neil heard information about kanye, isn't he worth an R on the page? Or is it just covered as jay-z & kanye west? Would make me feel alot better if he was rumoured :3

we took the Jay-Z & Kanye off as that can't happen (if press releases aren't telling porkies, that is).

If Kanye is going to appear on that page again it's likely to be as a TBC and appearing sometime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does everyone say "can't afford anyone else good because blown in all on the Stones"? I love the way people know Glastonbury's finances inside out. No-one knows what the Stones have been offered, no-one knows how it compares to previous years, everyone must assume Stevie Wonder and U2 played for a packet of peanuts. For all of the know-it-alls, could you provide a breakdown of where the extra £1.7m from ticket sales (£10 x 170,000) has gone? Could some of it be used to finance the Stones without hitting the bottom line? Or maybe all of your assumptions are wrong? Actually that can't be right given your expertise in the area...I apologise for questioning anybody that clearly knows every fine detail about the Festival (apart from Sunday's headliner, that is)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does everyone say "can't afford anyone else good because blown in all on the Stones"? I love the way people know Glastonbury's finances inside out. No-one knows what the Stones have been offered, no-one knows how it compares to previous years, everyone must assume Stevie Wonder and U2 played for a packet of peanuts. For all of the know-it-alls, could you provide a breakdown of where the extra £1.7m from ticket sales (£10 x 170,000) has gone? Could some of it be used to finance the Stones without hitting the bottom line? Or maybe all of your assumptions are wrong? Actually that can't be right given your expertise in the area...I apologise for questioning anybody that clearly knows every fine detail about the Festival (apart from Sunday's headliner, that is)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does everyone say "can't afford anyone else good because blown in all on the Stones"? I love the way people know Glastonbury's finances inside out. No-one knows what the Stones have been offered, no-one knows how it compares to previous years, everyone must assume Stevie Wonder and U2 played for a packet of peanuts. For all of the know-it-alls, could you provide a breakdown of where the extra £1.7m from ticket sales (£10 x 170,000) has gone? Could some of it be used to finance the Stones without hitting the bottom line? Or maybe all of your assumptions are wrong? Actually that can't be right given your expertise in the area...I apologise for questioning anybody that clearly knows every fine detail about the Festival (apart from Sunday's headliner, that is)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does everyone say "can't afford anyone else good because blown in all on the Stones"? I love the way people know Glastonbury's finances inside out. No-one knows what the Stones have been offered, no-one knows how it compares to previous years, everyone must assume Stevie Wonder and U2 played for a packet of peanuts. For all of the know-it-alls, could you provide a breakdown of where the extra £1.7m from ticket sales (£10 x 170,000) has gone? Could some of it be used to finance the Stones without hitting the bottom line? Or maybe all of your assumptions are wrong? Actually that can't be right given your expertise in the area...I apologise for questioning anybody that clearly knows every fine detail about the Festival (apart from Sunday's headliner, that is)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

as floorfiller rightly says above, they are a childish band that people tend to grow out of when they realise there are loads of bands in that genre of music, but who do it much much much better.

And those people who dont grow out of it, are clearly a little bit simple.

It's fine. It's like stereophonics, snow patrol, franz ferdinand fans. Dont worry about it, you just dont have a very good musical ear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, you are now officially the biggest c**t on these boards, which is an impressive feat! Who the fuck are you to say people who like certain bands are simple and have a poor musical ear! I love the foo fighters, i'm not saying its not rock by numbers but I love them, I think they're a great band with some great songs. I also like stereohponics, snow patrol and franz ferdinand but that doesn't mean thats all I like.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, you are now officially the biggest c**t on these boards, which is an impressive feat! Who the fuck are you to say people who like certain bands are simple and have a poor musical ear! I love the foo fighters, i'm not saying its not rock by numbers but I love them, I think they're a great band with some great songs. I also like stereohponics, snow patrol and franz ferdinand but that doesn't mean thats all I like.

My music taste are far reaching and eclectic just because I like some pop/rock bands doesn't make me simple. I like a lot more obscure stuff, I'm a big fan of jazz, due to my dad I likes lots of obscure 80s funk and jazz fusion stuff like spyro gyra and shakatak, I'm quite partial to metal (though not screaming stuff), old school proper hip hop such as tribe called quest is also abundant on my ipod, always listening to 90s shoegaze bands like the warlocks, the telescopes and loads more!

Just because I like foo fighters doesn't make me or my music tastes simple, it means I like foo fighters... and I like loads of other bands, musicians and artists

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think I'm expressing myself very well, so I apologise for that.

Foo fighters, snow patrol, stereophonics...It's the musical equivalent of reading the Twilight books. I cant fathom why people read that trash when there is a plethora of amazing books out there.

I look down on those people too.

I'm aware the problem is all mine and not yours. In a way I wish I could live in your simplistic, blissfully ignorant world.

I mean no offence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...