Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2013 Headliners


Guest shangri-la_steward

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh mick, you sly worded man.

I'm just abit afraid that they may be pressured into doing it! And that will result in them not putting on a set as great as it would be if they wanted to play :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Jagger quotes are quite interesting, this far in he knows exactly whats on the table for The Stones and the different permutations.. He didnt say no, I know he didnt say yes either but I can think of a number of reasons why he wouldnt confirm just now.

I'm going to be a glass half full guy on this one and see it as a positive (for those of us who would like to see The stones at Glastonbury).

I am NOT saying this means they will play, but I do see it as a little positive tilt in a positive direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get quite confused with all the comments saying that it's all the bands choice. I thought that it was managers and producers that sort everything out, and the actual artist/band doesn't have much say in it at all?

Probably going to get a shed load of comments saying I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the NME quotes:

Asked about the Stones' plans for the next 12 months, Jagger said: "Well, I'm just looking at what offers are coming in for this year and sorting them out. I hate announcing things when they're not booked. People are always like, 'Yakety yak, you didn't do that in the end', and I say, 'Well, yeah, we never really announced it!'"

He later added: "All I'm doing at the moment is sifting through the possibilities, looking at the dates and how each one can fit in and so on. And then we'll see what we can come out with." Asked if one of those possibilities was playing Glastonbury, Jagger said:

There are other things in the world, you know, apart from Glastonbury! But then again, Glastonbury is very important. It seems to be very important to my children – highlight of their year!

Later on in the interview, which you will find in this week's NME (available on newsstands now), Jagger dropped his most clear hint about The Rolling Stones playing this year's Glastonbury festival to date. Jagger asked: "But is it going to be rainy on the Sunday? Isn't it nearly always rainy on the Sunday?"

"most clear hint" :sarcastic:

http://www.nme.com/news/the-rolling-stones/68447?

Edited by wenevertried
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do your filters block swearing? Because Mardy was effing and jeffing a bit on the last page.

Either that, or it's because someone mentioned the Vaccines, and your filters are as sick of them as the rest of us!

:banghead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • The Radio Dept.?! That's a surprise to me, they haven't toured in like 8 years. Hopefully they will announce some more shows.
    • I was assuming September in Stirling might have a different issue tbf in the form of it just pissing it down.
    • Yeah so many of mine seem to be just France v Spain in one semi and England/Brazil v Argentina in the other. But the fact those combos are the obvious ones mean it feels unlikely that'll happen because in World Cup history, you very rarely end up with what pre-tournament looks like the obvious final 4. We all see teams outperform and underperform. Which one is the fall guy is a different matter.   I've said elsewhere that for me, there's a hierarchy of Spain, France and Argentina as the 3 strongest looking, then England and Portugal, then Brazil and Germany, but that overall, they'd be the 7 likeliest to win. So I dunno, maybe this will be the time the Netherlands avenge the failure of total football in 1974 and achieve what they couldn't achieve through whatever the f**k Nigel de Jong was with his 2010 final karate moves.
    • Oh I think Infantino should resign. His handling of the whole WC process has been an utter shitshow. But you know. That would require him having integrity or something.
    • Good Charlotte would be fine third down or subbing. If they can get a bigger sub and still get GC, they’ll play third down. 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...