compared to the impractical possibilities of having blind faith in spending resources you don't have to fail to deliver on the promises you'd made, and the electoral failure that comes from empty grandstanding.
Yes, so we would take in an allotted amount that may or may not be more than those who currently cross the channel and have their asylum approved, and these people wouldn't need to risk their lives crossing the channel. Still, a hugely complex problem and very easy to come up with simple solutions on a forum.
i was thinking that when the war on drugs kicked off i had heard the names of a few politicians connected to drug importing, always thought it would be too ineffective to catch them and i wonder if there's any politicians involved in the high profits of the small boats.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.