Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

Fender - Liam Gallagher

Gaga - Vampire Weekend

Fred Again - Sabrina Carpenter

Legend - Aerosmith*

 

With George Ezra as an Other headliner ready to step up if Gaga falls through or Sam drops out due to illness. 

 

*Lost track of what’s going on with Aerosmith so if they’ve broken up or all died or something then soz. 

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Fender - Liam Gallagher

Gaga - Vampire Weekend

Fred Again - Sabrina Carpenter

Legend - Aerosmith*

 

With George Ezra as an Other headliner ready to step up if Gaga falls through or Sam drops out due to illness. 

 

*Lost track of what’s going on with Aerosmith so if they’ve broken up or all died or something then soz. 

Aero is on their "farewell" tour which ends in Feb of 2025. But if you thought Cyndi and Shania had bad vocals, wait for Steven Tyler.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, adms said:

Long over due a dance act on the pyramid- Chemical Brothers would kill a Sunday night headliner?

 

The Chems have admitted they like doing Other Stage and dont wanna do the Pyramid again. So its easily Fred Again if its next year or 2027. All Fred has to do is just refine his show a little bit and itll be fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Suprefan said:

Aero is on their "farewell" tour which ends in Feb of 2025. But if you thought Cyndi and Shania had bad vocals, wait for Steven Tyler.

 

 

if Diana Ross survived with her career intact, Tyler would be fine. Probably more of an issue that judging by Wikipedia they can’t go more than five minutes without falling out. Stormer if it happens though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Fender - Liam Gallagher

Gaga - Vampire Weekend

Fred Again - Sabrina Carpenter

Legend - Aerosmith*

 

With George Ezra as an Other headliner ready to step up if Gaga falls through or Sam drops out due to illness. 

 

*Lost track of what’s going on with Aerosmith so if they’ve broken up or all died or something then soz. 

 

In no world is Liam subbing for Sam Fender. 

 

He'd do it for Macca, The Who, the Stones or someone legendary for sure. His ego wouldn't allow it for Fender I'm certain of it and to be honest I don't really blame him either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Benjsh said:

 

In no world is Liam subbing for Sam Fender. 

 

He'd do it for Macca, The Who, the Stones or someone legendary for sure. His ego wouldn't allow it for Fender I'm certain of it and to be honest I don't really blame him either. 

He did it for The Killers but fair enough. Maybe Gerry Cinnamon or something. Idk I’m not really up on what the bucket hat crowd are into at the moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/26/2024 at 10:56 AM, FrogLobster said:

Olivia Rodrigo, Fred Again, Depeche Mode

 

Pulp subbing Fred.

 

Not sure where DM is coming from? I think Pulp will sub but Emily and Co have made a massive hash of a lot of this festival and in my opinion it's time to get a booker in place that has a clue.

43 minutes ago, FuzzyDunlop said:

Gaga

Fred Again

Dave

 

 

I'd change it to Gaga, Fred Again, Fender based on them. But I think Olivia will be over Gaga. I'm almost certain they book book two female headliners within the next two years unless it was with Gaga and Olivia available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Serenefishy said:

I think Pulp are worthy to be Pyramid Headliner. Possible last ever gig, 30 year anniversary of the legendary 1995 set. Probably won’t happen though.

 

I agree, they would draw an insane crowd for a sub if they were put there, and I wouldn't want to be the act to follow them for sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Suprefan said:

Aero is on their "farewell" tour which ends in Feb of 2025. But if you thought Cyndi and Shania had bad vocals, wait for Steven Tyler.

 

 

I happened to be at the last gig (Elmont) before the original tour was cancelled. They tore the place apart, albeit Tyler obviously f**ked his voice in the process. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need to get more professional with the booking of pyramid headliners and have genuine back up plans. Every time they’ve gone hard after a white whale that’s failed they’ve been left scrambling around for a headliner…
 

2011: Failed to get Prince, ended up bumping up Beyoncé

2014: Failed to get Prince, ended up with Metallica 

2015: Failed to get Prince, ended up with the Who 

2019: Failed to get Fleetwood Mac, ended up with the Killers 

2023: Failed to get Rihanna, ended up with GnR 

2024: Failed to get Madonna, ended up bumping up SZA 


Obviously some of those worked out great, some were fine but uninspired, some flat out failed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frankly Mr Shankly said:

They need to get more professional with the booking of pyramid headliners and have genuine back up plans. Every time they’ve gone hard after a white whale that’s failed they’ve been left scrambling around for a headliner…
 

2011: Failed to get Prince, ended up bumping up Beyoncé

2014: Failed to get Prince, ended up with Metallica 

2015: Failed to get Prince, ended up with the Who 

2019: Failed to get Fleetwood Mac, ended up with the Killers 

2023: Failed to get Rihanna, ended up with GnR 

2024: Failed to get Madonna, ended up bumping up SZA 


Obviously some of those worked out great, some were fine but uninspired, some flat out failed. 

Rihanna was unfortunate because she got pregnant. The others were always ambitious shouts likely to fall through but they clearly got used to the idea there’d always be a massive stadium filling act ready to step in if necessary. And that strategy fell flat on its face this year, sadly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

Rihanna was unfortunate because she got pregnant. The others were always ambitious shouts likely to fall through but they clearly got used to the idea there’d always be a massive stadium filling act ready to step in if necessary. And that strategy fell flat on its face this year, sadly. 

They could have got away with bumping Lizzo up last year. I think the backlash from them not doing that inspired them this year to bump SZA. 
 

Equality and diversity is important, but it shouldn’t be the sole factor in booking decisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frankly Mr Shankly said:

They could have got away with bumping Lizzo up last year. I think the backlash from them not doing that inspired them this year to bump SZA. 
 

Equality and diversity is important, but it shouldn’t be the sole factor in booking decisions. 

Yea being in Lizzo's crowd it felt like that definitely should've happened. And felt like an easy opportunity for more diversity on the top line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Frankly Mr Shankly said:

They need to get more professional with the booking of pyramid headliners and have genuine back up plans. Every time they’ve gone hard after a white whale that’s failed they’ve been left scrambling around for a headliner…
 

2011: Failed to get Prince, ended up bumping up Beyoncé

2014: Failed to get Prince, ended up with Metallica 

2015: Failed to get Prince, ended up with the Who 

2019: Failed to get Fleetwood Mac, ended up with the Killers 

2023: Failed to get Rihanna, ended up with GnR 

2024: Failed to get Madonna, ended up bumping up SZA 


Obviously some of those worked out great, some were fine but uninspired, some flat out failed. 

 

I guess they still have to be ambitious with their bookings. Glasto is still the premier festival in the UK and it should always aim for the absolute best, but I get your point.

 

What I don't understand with the booking system across the whole site is that each area/stage book their own lineup, isn't that right?

 

If West Holts lands Sugababes and it's known that the thirst for nostalgia is huge these days and the growing pop-focused/accepted line-ups, why can't they just switch them to the Pyramid? They had to shut the field for them. Why not just say, "You did well there WH landing them, but we want as many people to see them as possible, so we're giving them a bigger stage."?

 

Perhaps I'm missing something, but there were a number of strange bookings or placements this year. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MEGATRONICMEATWAGON said:

 

I guess they still have to be ambitious with their bookings. Glasto is still the premier festival in the UK and it should always aim for the absolute best, but I get your point.

 

What I don't understand with the booking system across the whole site is that each area/stage book their own lineup, isn't that right?

 

If West Holts lands Sugababes and it's known that the thirst for nostalgia is huge these days and the growing pop-focused/accepted line-ups, why can't they just switch them to the Pyramid? They had to shut the field for them. Why not just say, "You did well there WH landing them, but we want as many people to see them as possible, so we're giving them a bigger stage."?

 

Perhaps I'm missing something, but there were a number of strange bookings or placements this year. 

 

 

Don’t get me wrong, I wasn’t saying they shouldn’t be ambitious, just that they should have more robust back up plans when it doesn’t come through. 
 

Absolutely agree with your points, this year more than ever looked like 4 or 5 different festivals booked in isolation without any crossover thought to the process. For example Sugababes & Avril both should have been on the Pyramid, whereas PJ Harvey & Janelle Monae would have benefited being on a smaller stage.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, MEGATRONICMEATWAGON said:

 

I guess they still have to be ambitious with their bookings. Glasto is still the premier festival in the UK and it should always aim for the absolute best, but I get your point.

 

What I don't understand with the booking system across the whole site is that each area/stage book their own lineup, isn't that right?

 

If West Holts lands Sugababes and it's known that the thirst for nostalgia is huge these days and the growing pop-focused/accepted line-ups, why can't they just switch them to the Pyramid? They had to shut the field for them. Why not just say, "You did well there WH landing them, but we want as many people to see them as possible, so we're giving them a bigger stage."?

 

Perhaps I'm missing something, but there were a number of strange bookings or placements this year. 

 

 

I'd be interested to hear how they co-ordinate their bookings across the stages. It's clearly something that needs work. As far as i can remember Emily and her partner do Pyramid and Other but surely there needs to be site wide co-ordination. Having said that if you've got a weak line up like this year, your hands will become a little tied no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Justcalledtosay said:

I'd be interested to hear how they co-ordinate their bookings across the stages. It's clearly something that needs work. As far as i can remember Emily and her partner do Pyramid and Other but surely there needs to be site wide co-ordination. Having said that if you've got a weak line up like this year, your hands will become a little tied no matter what.

 

It just seems like every year at the moment - perhaps because of the increase in the amount of people going, there's always someone who is majorly overly subscribed. It happened once or twice before ten years ago, but now Barry Can't Swim and Sugababes are shutting fields down on the same day. Not even small areas like Glade, but the ruddy Park and WH. 

 

The line-up personally for me this year was also very weak and I hope it's not a sign of things to come. Perhaps all the planets and stars didn't align this time. Or perhaps as they've tried to expand the festival and have more decent acts on the Thursday night, this has taken some artists away from the main Fri-Sun days? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frankly Mr Shankly said:

They could have got away with bumping Lizzo up last year. I think the backlash from them not doing that inspired them this year to bump SZA. 
 

Equality and diversity is important, but it shouldn’t be the sole factor in booking decisions. 

 

 

1 hour ago, Frankly Mr Shankly said:

Don’t get me wrong, I wasn’t saying they shouldn’t be ambitious, just that they should have more robust back up plans when it doesn’t come through. 
 

Absolutely agree with your points, this year more than ever looked like 4 or 5 different festivals booked in isolation without any crossover thought to the process. For example Sugababes & Avril both should have been on the Pyramid, whereas PJ Harvey & Janelle Monae would have benefited being on a smaller stage.  

Yeah, I agree with all this, not sure I entirely agree with your earlier point about them needing it more professional about the headliners…

 

1 hour ago, Frankly Mr Shankly said:

They need to get more professional with the booking of pyramid headliners and have genuine back up plans. Every time they’ve gone hard after a white whale that’s failed they’ve been left scrambling around for a headliner…
 

2011: Failed to get Prince, ended up bumping up Beyoncé

2014: Failed to get Prince, ended up with Metallica 

2015: Failed to get Prince, ended up with the Who 

2019: Failed to get Fleetwood Mac, ended up with the Killers 

2023: Failed to get Rihanna, ended up with GnR 

2024: Failed to get Madonna, ended up bumping up SZA 


Obviously some of those worked out great, some were fine but uninspired, some flat out failed. 

I think Beyoncé, Metallica, Killers and even GNR were good-very good bookings. The Who were uninspired but are an all time act. SZA is the only one that that has gone really south, by accounts.


Maybe it is professionalism but How easy is it to have a genuine Pyramid headliner on call as back-up?  
 

Could it not be, if they could have booked someone better they would have done and if someone is willing to be a back-up it is likely because they aren’t popular enough or are uninspired?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DJL said:

 

 

Yeah, I agree with all this, not sure I entirely agree with your earlier point about them needing it more professional about the headliners…

 

I think Beyoncé, Metallica, Killers and even GNR were good-very good bookings. The Who were uninspired but are an all time act. SZA is the only one that that has gone really south, by accounts.


Maybe it is professionalism but How easy is it to have a genuine Pyramid headliner on call as back-up?  
 

Could it not be, if they could have booked someone better they would have done and if someone is willing to be a back-up it is likely because they aren’t popular enough or are uninspired?

The Killers and the Who were uninspired but fine, Metallica & GnR were risks for the audience but ultimately paid off, yet everybody knows they would never have been Glastonbury’s first choices. I think people forget that in 2011 Beyoncé wasn’t the same power house she is now, she subbed T in the Park that year so by all accounts it was a ‘risk’ to bump her to headline, one that did pay off. 
 

I agree SZA is the only one where it’s gone really south.  I think the issue this year with SZA was more that the festival felt the need to have another female headliner, so when Madonna fell through rather than going to a more suitable option they chose to bump SZA. Ironically last year when the same situation happened with Rihanna, they could and should have bumped Lizzo but chose not to. 
 

Maybe professional was the wrong word. But what I meant was, when they go after these elusive white whale bookings (Prince, Fleetwood Mac, Madonna) they seem to put all their eggs in that basket  & don’t seem to have a strong contingency when it inevitably fails. 

Edited by Frankly Mr Shankly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...