Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, DareToDibble said:

Olivia Rodrigo, Taylor Swift (I know I'm dreaming) + 1 more would be unreal.

OR does feel realistic though.

Gotta get cheap headliners now. O Rod's nightly fee is around $2 mil. So a festival would be more.

 

 

Sam Fender

Coldplay

Rihanna

Edited by Suprefan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

Gotta get cheap headliners now. O Rod's nightly fee is around $2 mil. So a festival would be more.

 

 

Sam Fender

Coldplay

Rihanna

Actually think 1 and 3 are good shouts. 

I still wonder how true the rumours are Rihanna was meant to play '23

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, DareToDibble said:

Olivia Rodrigo, Taylor Swift (I know I'm dreaming) + 1 more would be unreal.

OR does feel realistic though.

I wonder if Olivia Rodrigo might do Reading first.

But then who knows. Depends on what the touring landscape is next year, or indeed, if she decides to go write and record some new stuff instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2024 at 11:37 PM, DareToDibble said:

Actually think 1 and 3 are good shouts. 

I still wonder how true the rumours are Rihanna was meant to play '23

I would go with being pretty true. Taylor saying no, Rihanna would be one of the next on the list but baby plans put pay to it.

I think Rihanna and Fender are two very big and obvious options. If Dave is back he can't be discounted. He only headlined Reading in 2022. Both him and Fender realistically are probably looking at Glastonbury and outdoor shows of their own as options. Fender I think repays the faith for the bump up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

At the festival that's booked Johnny Cash, Shania Twain, Dolly Parton, Miley Cyrus, Kacey Musgraves, Willie Nelson etc?

The big difference being that none of those were actually headliners. If Beyonce wanted to do it again though and accept the price, there is absolutely no doubt they will book it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

Olivia Rodrigo, Sam Fender, Rihanna is where my ‘betting on 2025’ budget (£15) is going 

I would not be shocked to be honest, although I think they may end up with Dave if Olivia takes the Reading pay packet. All subjective opinion aside, that 3 would see me happy to take an off year and maybe completely as I see it drifting from me anyway. That just isn't worth £370/80 of my money. They might go and get Nick Cave, Pulp and let's be honest the 3rd will be someone like Raye or Skepta etc and only Pulp will interest me. I won't deny also that it's very rare that the other stage headliners suit my tastes and this year I literally have no headliner of interest that I would choose openly to watch on any stage. The other stage is probably the worst it's ever been for me with a little interest in Disclosure. My tastes are very broad but broad in their way that I like an elements of stuff. What they have tried to do on the other stages just isn't for me.

I'm actually looking at the option of Riot Fest! for next year. 20th anniversary.

Also, talking anniversaries, it's technically Glastonbury 50th year this year isn't it if you count the pandemic years as not happening. I'm aware they addressed 2022 as that.

Edited by northernangel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, northernangel said:

Also, talking anniversaries, it's technically Glastonbury 50th year this year isn't it if you count the pandemic years as not happening. I'm aware they addressed 2022 as that.

I'm not sure how the maths would work on that, and even if they did it would be an odd way of looking at it.

There's always been gaps in the lineage (including most of the 70s), so not sure why they'd arbitrarily disregard those 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, incident said:

I'm not sure how the maths would work on that, and even if they did it would be an odd way of looking at it.

There's always been gaps in the lineage (including most of the 70s), so not sure why they'd arbitrarily disregard those 2 years.

I only mention it because there were different circumstances, it wasn't like it was a fallow year. It has run every year bar then follows except for the 71 to 79 gap where they obviously managed to tun it again. There is the odd other festival out there that delayed their anniversary due to the gap. I probably wouldn't question it had it been 1 year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...