Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, kalifire said:

That’s an exaggeration at best, except for GnR.

Seems like you’re in ‘I don’t like them so I’ll argue they’re weak’ mode. 

Ffs you’re doing it again

I’m allowed to dislike the headliners man come on. I said nothing about them being weak I said they are all past it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Even Arctic Monkeys after releasing one of last year's best-selling albums?

Again, why are people talking about whether they’ve got the credentials. Please go back and read the point I was making because you missed it.

I’m talking about LIVE PERFORMANCES. Going to see AM and coming back feeling disappointed appears to be a trend. I’ve still not got over how shite they were at TITP 2014 and how tired they looked at R&L later that summer. Judging by recent shows and reactions it looks like nothing has changed.

I’m talking about who is going to put on an exciting show. Nothing else. So please stop talking about how many albums or tickets they’ve sold. I know all three of them still sell well and I’m not disputing it.

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

In that case Arctic Monkeys aren't past it as a live act - they just never arrived in the first place.

I thought they weren’t too shabby in 2013 and had far more energy and enthusiasm than they do now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt42 said:

“You don’t like the headliners? Here’s some stats about how big they are to convince you that you’re wrong”.

The main points that put me off the headliners are (a) it’s not very diverse and limited in genre, (b) all three of them have shit live reputations or are clearly past it.

We aren’t going to get anything like a show from Macca or Kendrick this year. It’s hard to get excited about it. Especially nothing like Billies.

“You think the headliners are a bad booking because you don’t like them? Here’s some stats that make an objective case that means far more.”

 

”all three of them have shit live reputations on Efestivals so all those people who keep filling big venues to watch them (and Emily who booked them) are wrong.”

 

FIFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Ffs you’re doing it again

I’m allowed to dislike the headliners man come on. I said nothing about them being weak I said they are all past it.

You’re trying to apply objective value to subjective opinions, like so many others who’ve made the same mistake

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's a bad line up myself but it's certainly a different direction from the past few years. I think it's a combination of a few things that is turning people off:

1) GnR are a bit gross. Less dad-rock more 90s lad-rock. It's not about what band members may or may not have done, just the way their entire music and stage presence oozes a sort of old fashioned gross masculinity. It's at odds with the festival ethos. Had always assumed they'd never play for that reason until Emily's interview.

2) it's two heritage headliners. Acts that aren't actively writing new stuff and whose peaks were over 30 years ago. And yeah, Elton is arguably bigger than ever and GnR have put out a few singles but they're both closer to heritage acts than anything else.

3) the remaining act are also past their prime, giving a full trio of acts all clearly past their peak, and not a single modern act when half the past 6 headliners have been in that category.

I think all those taken together make it a bit weird. Like I say, I don't have an issue with it at all but it is different.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

“You think the headliners are a bad booking because you don’t like them? Here’s some stats that make an objective case that means far more.”

 

”all three of them have shit live reputations on Efestivals so all those people who keep filling big venues to watch them (and Emily who booked them) are wrong.”

 

FIFY

Oh for fucks sake this is tiring. Read all my posts again because you’re really not getting it.

What I’m saying is I’m allowed to dislike the headliners and have a problem with it, but it looks like here whenever you criticise them there’s an army of facts to try and catch you out on it. I don’t get it. It feels culty. You’re perfectly fine to like them but you shouldn’t expect everyone else to shut up and not have a view. 

5 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:

You’re trying to apply objective value to subjective opinions, like so many others who’ve made the same mistake

“I said they are all past it”

I - as in, my view. 

absolutely nothing objective about that. Otherwise I wouldn’t use the word I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeanoL said:

I don't think it's a bad line up myself but it's certainly a different direction from the past few years. I think it's a combination of a few things that is turning people off:

1) GnR are a bit gross. Less dad-rock more 90s lad-rock. It's not about what band members may or may not have done, just the way their entire music and stage presence oozes a sort of old fashioned gross masculinity. It's at odds with the festival ethos. Had always assumed they'd never play for that reason until Emily's interview.

2) it's two heritage headliners. Acts that aren't actively writing new stuff and whose peaks were over 30 years ago. And yeah, Elton is arguably bigger than ever and GnR have put out a few singles but they're both closer to heritage acts than anything else.

3) the remaining act are also past their prime, giving a full trio of acts all clearly past their peak, and not a single modern act when half the past 6 headliners have been in that category.

I think all those taken together make it a bit weird. Like I say, I don't have an issue with it at all but it is different.

 

GNR is definitely the oddball or of the trio. Emily is very keen though, and they’ve booked plenty of other aces who’ve engaged in many of the same activities that give them a greasy vibe. They still have a stage named after John Peel.

The heritage headliner thing came up in 2009 with Bruce and Neil. Eavis defence at the time was that when you get a chance to book acts like that you have to just do it. There may not be another chance. That very much applies to these two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

, but it looks like here whenever you criticise them there’s an army of facts to try and catch you out on it. 

l

Mate, you are the first person to rock up with the latest Spotify numbers when someone’s having a pop at an act you like…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Exciting new face Billie Eilish turned in a three star show last summer. Aged has been Reg is guaranteed to better that.

A few of my group saw her last year and left due to being bored.  

I saw her when she was on the other stage and last about 4 songs.  The mumbling sound did nothing for me.  

Amazing how these new hot artists can be objectively rubbish too 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass II said:

Mate, you are the first person to rock up with the latest Spotify numbers when someone’s having a pop at an act you like…

Name one time I’ve done that recently. Feel free to go through my recent posts to find the evidence. I’l wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Oh for fucks sake this is tiring. Read all my posts again because you’re really not getting it.

What I’m saying is I’m allowed to dislike the headliners and have a problem with it, but it looks like here whenever you criticise them there’s an army of facts to try and catch you out on it. I don’t get it. It feels culty. You’re perfectly fine to like them but you shouldn’t expect everyone else to shut up and not have a view. 

“I said they are all past it”

I - as in, my view. 

absolutely nothing objective about that. Otherwise I wouldn’t use the word I.

You can throw a down voting hissyfit all you want. I’ve read your posts, that’s why I put what I did.

Edited by MEGABOWL
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Name one time I’ve done that recently. Feel free to go through my recent posts to find the evidence. I’l wait.

When Midnights and The Car came out you were constantly comparing the numbers and discussing when The Car was released as if you were working at Domino records yourself, suggesting they should have moved the date etc. So you do have a history of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass II said:

I’m not going through your history, but we all know your reputation for these antics is well founded.

I’m getting really, really fucking tired of people making me out to say things I’m not saying and throwing stuff that I’ve done ages ago at me. I’m sure you all enjoy getting a rise from it. Or whenever someone gets bored dragging something from the past to win an argument. You’re one of the worst offenders. Fuck you.

 

1 minute ago, MEGABOWL said:

You can throw a down lying hissyfit all you want. I’ve read your posts, that’s why I put what I did.

Well I hope you enjoyed it and got the rise you wanted.

 

Fuck all of you. This place is the pits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Westons  https://www.westons-cider.co.uk/our-ciders/rosies-pig
    • More O2 December dates gone and still no Paul McCartney shows announced
    • Quick question. Rather enjoyed the Rhubarb Cider from the bars. I know Thatchers did the pump ciders but who made the Rhubarb Cider?
    • Top 5 acts of the weekend for me: 1. The Cure 2. my bloody valentine  3. caroline 4. Father John Misty 5. Big Thief   Biggest disappointments: - Slowdive (the mixing/sound just wasn’t right, and that was about 20 rows from the front of the stage) - The xx (also too quiet and marred by talkers who had no interest in the music)    Positives from an organisational sense: - extra water point at Mordor this year - handing out ponchos before the rain and ear plugs before mbv    However…two of the water points had ran out on Saturday evening, which is completely unacceptable when you stop people from bringing in large bottles of water, and charge €4.50 at the bars for a 330ml can 
    • Apparently Blink 182 doing this on 13th June next year 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...