Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, efcfanwirral said:

This sort of thing makes it more likely they'll be sent back due to Tory (and their voters!)  contempt for Unions 

Only if they have enough teachers in to staff them ... I’d imagine quite a high proportion of teachers are in unions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

 

Screenshot_20210101-214504~2.png


Something doesn’t add up here...

 

This data shows next to no hospital admissions in the under 45 groups which cannot be reconciled with all the doctors tweeting things like “ICU full of previously healthy people in their 30s”

 

Either the data is wrong, which I doubt given that it comes from the reliable ONS and PHE, or it’s completely out of date which would suggest that the new strain is causing more serious illness in younger adults, which I haven’t seen suggested by other academics.

 

OR there’s a conspiracy in play to try and convince younger adults that they’re personally at risk so they start taking it more seriously. If this is the case I’d genuinely prefer it if they just came out and told us we aren’t at risk but we still need to be careful to avoid passing the virus on to a vulnerable person, but perhaps the powers that be have deduced that a large percentage of young people don’t care about this and the only way to get them on board is to scare them into avoiding the virus.

 

The data doesn’t reconcile to what the doctors are telling us so one or the other has to be wrong. I’d be interested to see more recent data. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fuzzy Afro said:


Something doesn’t add up here...

 

This data shows next to no hospital admissions in the under 45 groups which cannot be reconciled with all the doctors tweeting things like “ICU full of previously healthy people in their 30s”

 

Either the data is wrong, which I doubt given that it comes from the reliable ONS and PHE, or it’s completely out of date which would suggest that the new strain is causing more serious illness in younger adults, which I haven’t seen suggested by other academics.

 

OR there’s a conspiracy in play to try and convince younger adults that they’re personally at risk so they start taking it more seriously. If this is the case I’d genuinely prefer it if they just came out and told us we aren’t at risk but we still need to be careful to avoid passing the virus on to a vulnerable person, but perhaps the powers that be have deduced that a large percentage of young people don’t care about this and the only way to get them on board is to scare them into avoiding the virus.

 

The data doesn’t reconcile to what the doctors are telling us so one or the other has to be wrong. I’d be interested to see more recent data. 

probably a conspiracy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:


Something doesn’t add up here...

 

This data shows next to no hospital admissions in the under 45 groups which cannot be reconciled with all the doctors tweeting things like “ICU full of previously healthy people in their 30s”

 

Either the data is wrong, which I doubt given that it comes from the reliable ONS and PHE, or it’s completely out of date which would suggest that the new strain is causing more serious illness in younger adults, which I haven’t seen suggested by other academics.

 

OR there’s a conspiracy in play to try and convince younger adults that they’re personally at risk so they start taking it more seriously. If this is the case I’d genuinely prefer it if they just came out and told us we aren’t at risk but we still need to be careful to avoid passing the virus on to a vulnerable person, but perhaps the powers that be have deduced that a large percentage of young people don’t care about this and the only way to get them on board is to scare them into avoiding the virus.

 

The data doesn’t reconcile to what the doctors are telling us so one or the other has to be wrong. I’d be interested to see more recent data. 

Or  there are a few wards with younger  patients but the broader picture is that it isn't younger people aren't being effected more.

Edited by zahidf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

The key is are a greater percentage of infected young adults ending up in hospital.

Yeah. And nothing in the stats to indicate that. Individual health professionals have probably seen some younger people but not enough to be statistically significant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:


Something doesn’t add up here...

 

This data shows next to no hospital admissions in the under 45 groups which cannot be reconciled with all the doctors tweeting things like “ICU full of previously healthy people in their 30s”

 

Either the data is wrong, which I doubt given that it comes from the reliable ONS and PHE, or it’s completely out of date which would suggest that the new strain is causing more serious illness in younger adults, which I haven’t seen suggested by other academics.

 

OR there’s a conspiracy in play to try and convince younger adults that they’re personally at risk so they start taking it more seriously. If this is the case I’d genuinely prefer it if they just came out and told us we aren’t at risk but we still need to be careful to avoid passing the virus on to a vulnerable person, but perhaps the powers that be have deduced that a large percentage of young people don’t care about this and the only way to get them on board is to scare them into avoiding the virus.

 

The data doesn’t reconcile to what the doctors are telling us so one or the other has to be wrong. I’d be interested to see more recent data. 

I was thinking about this yesterday as I had the same thoughts. I reckon it's down to the numbers and circumstances.

Its measured in that graph per 100,000 so that is a still not zero. 

And generally many of those in ICUs feeling the need to speak out because things are so bad will be in the areas most affected, where higher numbers overall come in, so that increases the probability that those numbers include younger people. So it probably has gone up since December 13th because cases have gone through the roof, but most likely the number of young people admitted is proportional with that graph if that makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:


Something doesn’t add up here...

 

This data shows next to no hospital admissions in the under 45 groups which cannot be reconciled with all the doctors tweeting things like “ICU full of previously healthy people in their 30s”

 

Either the data is wrong, which I doubt given that it comes from the reliable ONS and PHE, or it’s completely out of date which would suggest that the new strain is causing more serious illness in younger adults, which I haven’t seen suggested by other academics.

 

OR there’s a conspiracy in play to try and convince younger adults that they’re personally at risk so they start taking it more seriously. If this is the case I’d genuinely prefer it if they just came out and told us we aren’t at risk but we still need to be careful to avoid passing the virus on to a vulnerable person, but perhaps the powers that be have deduced that a large percentage of young people don’t care about this and the only way to get them on board is to scare them into avoiding the virus.

 

The data doesn’t reconcile to what the doctors are telling us so one or the other has to be wrong. I’d be interested to see more recent data. 

The data is several weeks old, those were admissions will be from infections at the late/ end of November where cases from the new strain were a lot lower. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Leyrulion said:

Zoe app went over 60k today. Heading to 70k on there 

We’ve sadly already hit it according to specimen date data.

E6BA5821-9522-4892-A91D-264FE7AB0CF5.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...