Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Radiohead touring in 2016


Redwinevino

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've been wanting to see Radiohead at Glastonbury since 1997, but I'm getting really sick of this rollercoaster!

1 minute ago, dentalplan said:

Why sub tho? Before the biggest artist in the world surely would be bigger than, say, four hours earlier - or the same anyway.

I still need to see it to believe it, really. I hope it isn't the above because fuck me that'd be shit.

Might be because I've just woken up, but - eh? Are you suggesting Radiohead would be scheduled on the Pyramid in the middle of the day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Why sub tho? Before the biggest artist in the world surely would be bigger than, say, four hours earlier - or the same anyway.

I still need to see it to believe it, really. I hope it isn't the above because fuck me that'd be shit.

pyramid sub crowds tend to be pretty huge anyway, and there's tons of stuff on the other stages to take people away from the Pyramid, whereas earlier the pull from other stages is less so. Not that Radiohead would pull a particularly mental crowd, but sub would probably be the safest option

I still find it pretty hard to believe and can't really get excited until I see some proof of it possibly happening...

Edited by FloorFiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'd sort of rather they didn't play at all then played a short set subbing Adele. I'd rather keep the dream alive for a proper, career spanning headline show in 2017, the sort we will have been waiting for for fourteen years and had to endure three Coldplay headline performances in the intervening period. 

Also, given there was a lot of "four headliners" talk a few years ago when (was it Coldplay?) were almost the fourth headliner, why isn't there any four headliners talk this year? I've seen some festivals do this sort of thing before, but they've billed it as joint headliners. 

Also haven't they specifically moved their Secret Solstice gig indoors, despite not everyone at the festival being able to attend? Because of the light outside? It makes no sense they'd actively choose to play Glasto as subs when its light out...

Edited by arcade fireman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FloorFiller said:

what the hell are you talking about? there were huge anti tout measures in place - that you could only buy 2 tickets and that the lead booker had to have ID with them and the second person had to come along with them - but obviously they overlooked that touts would be willing to walk in to the venue with the person they've overcharged by £900

as for only a small amount of tickets being on sale - it's a goddamn intimate tour to preview the album undoubtedly before the big one next year, just like tons and tons of bands do. Radiohead just happen to be a hell of a lot more popular than most of those bands hence why so many people have been left disappointed

Well of course they would....they are a tout. Small intimate your or not......just those 3 dates in the biggest ticket selling city in the UK for obvious reasons was utterly stupid. They should be selling tickets where both people need ID when they are purchased. 

41 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I've just had the first bit of - supposedly - confirming info, that they might be playing. :)

The info is a little tenuous - it certainly can't be fully trusted by itself - but there's still reason to think that it might be genuine and accurate. Then again, it might just be someone stringing along his mates, perhaps even using what's said on here as the basis of what he says.

All the same, it's the first bit of supposedly confirming info, and from the direction of someone who there's reason to think might know the real deal.

 

Is it?, you have already relayed a source of them playing which you believed to be from a reliable person, it was never mentioned in a headline sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stuartbert two hats said:

I've been wanting to see Radiohead at Glastonbury since 1997, but I'm getting really sick of this rollercoaster!

Might be because I've just woken up, but - eh? Are you suggesting Radiohead would be scheduled on the Pyramid in the middle of the day?

Not that I think it would happen but I'd say that if they're playing the Pyramid and not headlining then anything is possible. Being directly before Adele certainly wouldn't ease overcrowding fears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

and where did I mention 'a headline sense' in what I've posted today? :rolleyes:

That's what I'm saying. You have already mentioned a reliable source of info with them playing that wasn't in a headline sense anyway......so I'm not sure what's new about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mikeydredlox said:

so, if hypothetically you had a friend with a ticket to one of the Roundhouse gigs, who discovered they could not make it, what would you advise them to do?

Not commit to start with.....if you get a ticket for a major band of yours in that setting.....you make it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thewayiam said:

That's what I'm saying. You have already mentioned a reliable source of info with them playing that wasn't in a headline sense anyway......so I'm not sure what's new about this.

From what I can gather, the news from this is that Neil had other sources saying Radiohead were not on the bill (either indicating they weren't playing, or a secret set), but this source is saying they actually are. 

I think that's it at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
12 minutes ago, jparx said:

From what I can gather, the news from this is that Neil had other sources saying Radiohead were not on the bill (either indicating they weren't playing, or a secret set), but this source is saying they actually are. 

I think that's it at least.

Don't worry, there's no one here thicker than gazza thewayiam. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the current Other headliners 100% headlining? I could certainly see New Order, BMTH, maybe even LCD taking a step down, and I reckon it's more plausible that Radiohead would headline there than play before Adele on the pyramid. Put them on against her and crowds should be pretty split, draws away the casuals who'd moan at a current Radiohead set as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mash011 said:

Are the current Other headliners 100% headlining? I could certainly see New Order, BMTH, maybe even LCD taking a step down, and I reckon it's more plausible that Radiohead would headline there than play before Adele on the pyramid. Put them on against her and crowds should be pretty split, draws away the casuals who'd moan at a current Radiohead set as well.

All three would certainly fit the bill as an 'upbeat sub' along side Adele

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, jparx said:

From what I can gather, the news from this is that Neil had other sources saying Radiohead were not on the bill (either indicating they weren't playing, or a secret set), but this source is saying they actually are. 

I think that's it at least.

Ah.....it's not that much of a change. The reliable source was enough for Neil to believe it was probably correct anyway.

37 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

It's getting to the point where I want to see them announced, less to go and see them and more to witness Gaz's mini-meltdown.

Why would I have a meltdown?......the header I wanted has been announced...I never had an issue with Radiohead playing a different set lol

34 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Don't worry, there's no one here thicker than gazza thewayiam. :)

Bar you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • It does feel like there's a push back against net zero from both left and right, but especially the right. Probably since Trump I guess, but even before Trump you had the tea party and Sarah Palin thing, but over here the right were on board with the issue of climate change and the need to address it, from Thatcher through to Johnson. That has now changed, first it was the populist right, not it is mainstream, with Badenoch making the two prerequisites for standing for the Tories being against net zero, and for leaving the ECHR. You can be an ex neo-nazi as long as you are against net zero. At least many now seem to accept the climate change is happening and it is caused by us, but they now say well it will be a nice mediterranean climate so lets bin net zero anyway and just have fun f**k all that woke green sh*t. But also the left, with various trade union leaders and blue labour types going on about net zero being bad for the economy and the need for reindustrialisation as we head back to the glory days of the 50s when we all worked down pit or something, ignoring the amount of industries and jobs created by net zero. The greens obviously are still firmly behind the net zero thing, but the party is also full of nimbys who are worried about hedgerows and hedgehogs and votes, and even the leadership have realised that there isn't votes in climate doomerism but there definitely is in bashing billionaires and Israel. I guess the main driver of net zero policies in the country is still Miliband which is probably why everyone seems to be f**king terrified of him, the mad freak and his renewables. He is out of the energy department, but his replacement is hardly a petrolhead, and he isn't in the treasury doing terrifying things like spending money, but he is in the foreign office which is maybe a good place for him because climate change is a global issue and its going to take a global effort.
    • Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 105 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 120 Garbage 125  Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 120 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 135  Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 65 Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 150 MAX  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 85 (-10) Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • Really enjoyed listening to the new Man/Woman/Chainsaw album this morning!
    • sh*t beans, poorly calibrated grinder, poorly set up machine, poorly/untrained staff.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...