Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Coachella


mccdyl001

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Olshansky said:

Damn I hadn't realized it didnt sell out.  

I think the two weekend thing is dumb, personally. It's a cash grab for the promoter, and prohibits musicians from hitting other california markets on their tour.  

Actually a lot of artists play shows in other markets between the two weekends.  San Francisco always gets a mini-chella during the week.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Mich1268 said:

Wow. Its not my cup of tea but with the whole of America you would have thought it would at least sell out

This year is particularly lacking in excitement, despite what the efestivals resident Bad Bunny fanclub will tell you, but it was only a matter of time until the meh headliners they’ve been booking since the Beyoncé year started affecting their ticket sales. They could do with pulling a Taylor Swift set out of the bag next year ideally. Glastonbury is very lucky that it doesn’t need the biggest stars on the planet in the same way (although obvs they help). 

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

I dunno. Not much wrong with Billie, Hazza and The Weeknd as a trio last year (I know the latter was a last minute botch job).

Fine for the tweens but not much for the parents who have to foot the bill to dig their teeth into. From the first year it expanded to two weekends through to Beyoncé’s year there was always at least one older-skewing act. If they went back to that balance rather than blowing the entire budget on the latest K-Pop sensation or whoever then I’m sure demand would go back to being what it was before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeez now I know why he’s called Bad Bunny. They should get Good Bunny next time. This set is execrable. 
 

Also does anyone actually listen to Yungblud? And, if so, why? He’s like a version of Blink 182 dreamt up by an AI algorithm running on a pocket calculator. 

Edited by JudgeGrumpy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turned on the stream for Bad Bunny when Post Malone was with him. Technical issues with the guitar. 
 

Big Tricky with Beyonce vibes. Except it was like there was 2 Trickys having no idea what to do.

It’s also like they miked up the smoke machine rather than Post Malone’s guitar.

Edited by aidenlangan95
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, a6l6e6x said:

From the 5 minutes I watched of bad bunny I can confirm I do not get it. Looks absolutely terrible

Yep - really awful.  Just watched a bit to see what the fuss is about - concluded it’s definitely not for me.  Really don’t get it at all - hard to listen to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Blondie actually sounding "not bad"

I was glad I watched as it frees up that slot for me now at Glasto. Debbie’s vocals actually grating at times. Fine when she wasn’t grating but there was plenty of the old cat being strangled vocal going on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...