Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Blur?


wozwebs

Recommended Posts

Same boat as you Hugh Jass. Tentatively waiting for a response. They're either going to screw over more people or just fork out and give us tickets. I doubt they'd be doing this is there wasn't a healthy amount of unsolds. We should hopefully be fine!

 

I keep telling myself it'll be fine, but the doubt remains.

 

I'm usually a rational fellow, but things like this send me insane.

Edited by Hugh Jass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Surely they will honour all of the people who have struggled, they still have GA tickets available at full price so they can just move the allocations around.

You would definitely assume so. Although BST do seem to have a great knack for pissing of their customers royally when it comes to their Hyde Park concerts.

I find it strange that 3 years after promising never to go back to Hyde Park for a concert after a truly abysmal night at Blur, I'm going back to Hyde Park for a Blur concert. I really must position myself as close to a speaker as possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would definitely assume so. Although BST do seem to have a great knack for pissing of their customers royally when it comes to their Hyde Park concerts.

I find it strange that 3 years after promising never to go back to Hyde Park for a concert after a truly abysmal night at Blur, I'm going back to Hyde Park for a Blur concert. I really must position myself as close to a speaker as possible

I've not been there since seeing The Chemical Brothers in 2011 (a show ruined by the fact the draconian sound and curfew restrictions meant the gig took place almost exclusively in the daylight) all I know is that I will be leaving my gig earplugs at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would definitely assume so. Although BST do seem to have a great knack for pissing of their customers royally when it comes to their Hyde Park concerts.

I find it strange that 3 years after promising never to go back to Hyde Park for a concert after a truly abysmal night at Blur, I'm going back to Hyde Park for a Blur concert. I really must position myself as close to a speaker as possible

 

Yeah same. I don't want to spend much money so will rock up pretty late in the day and hang near one of the back speakers. Nothing on the undercard does it for me, with the possible exception of Roots Manuva, but presumably he's in one of those tented venues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would definitely assume so. Although BST do seem to have a great knack for pissing of their customers royally when it comes to their Hyde Park concerts.

I find it strange that 3 years after promising never to go back to Hyde Park for a concert after a truly abysmal night at Blur, I'm going back to Hyde Park for a Blur concert. I really must position myself as close to a speaker as possible

 

Ditto!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I stood in the wrong area? TBH the whole day felt awful. Took ages to get served at the bar, pretty much missed the whole of The Specials. 

 

Yeah, I had this experience! It felt really overcrowed in there. We queued for 40 minutes for a pint. And then there were massive queues left for all the food stalls so we were forced to get chips from a hog roast - I'm a vegetarian - and they weren't even cooked.

 

However, we got a decent spot for Blur and they were great. No Glasto 2009 but hey ho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did an 11 hour coach to Amsterdam once, and and 10 hour one back from Paris. 

 

Neither we too bad, had the whole back row to myself :P

  

I went to amsterdam on a 12 hour coach.

 

Never ever again. was fucking horrendous

  

I did a coach once from Chicago to Boston. It took a day. Awful journey.

I went to Italy on a coach for a school skiing trip eight years ago. Took 26 hours each way. Winner.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...