Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

Macca, to do the same set again?! Would be bizarre.

But not as bizarre as Bowie.

Manager: "David, do you fancy playing live again? Considering you're a 68 year old man with a heart condition who hasn't played live in 12 years, maybe play one gig just to see how you feel after? See if you last the entire gig like"

Bowie: "Yeah, lets do a two hour Glastonbury gig live on the Beeb so".

:lol:

Its fucking nonsense.

Macca could do 4/5 Different setlist and it wld still be full of hits!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Paul McCartney is definitely worth a shout I think. Certainly more likely than Prince and Bowie I'd say.

Could explain the delay in announcing Macca as he's an exclusive elsewhere. Was why Metallica were announced late last time around May.

Don't want to wait till May time for the first big batch of names though would defo take some of the line-up next few days then headliner TBA later!

But the certainty of Florence appearing amid the uncertainty of her position on the bill inevitably means we're gonna have to wait till third headliner is fully booked before we get any announcement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still think Macca's in with a shout too.

Are tags such as 'European exclusive' always definite? Pretty sure Metallica were supposedly exclusives last year to Sonisphere before Glasto booked them.

Europe might not even include the UK (for festival bookings)?

I always think of Europe as the mainland... May just be me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In other news, the skin of the pyramid has started going on apparently.

Really?! Wow. Last year was early, but that would surprise me if true. What's the point, so early?

Let me just check the 'live' BBC cams.

Nope, definitely not the case ;)

Edited by kalifire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still think Macca's in with a shout too.

Are tags such as 'European exclusive' always definite? Pretty sure Metallica were supposedly exclusives last year to Sonisphere before Glasto booked them.

Europe might not even include the UK (for festival bookings)?

Metallicas exclusive part for Sonisphere was the "by request" part of their European festival tour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alas, I think there's more chance of us all winning the lottery on the exact same day than REM getting back together :(

Aye, anyone expecting them to play would be mental. It was more of an answer to the question "has a legend headlined twice", and REM did it in 1999 and 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's someone they've been after for a long time (as Neil said), then that'd surely make Prince more likely than Bowie? After him playing in 2000, how long are they likely to have been trying to get him back (especially considering he has been retired from playing live for most of that time)?

I'm gonna assume that the info relates to Prince, and that we'll end up with Flo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aye all this Bowie and Macca talk is nonsense. i'll go ahead and say it's Prince, and if he falls through (which there's a high chance of) then Flo will take his place. fingers crossed the little shit is in a good mood regarding Glastonbury these days - the lineup being announced and Flo being up top would be heartbreaking on so many levels, especially knowing what could have been

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That'd be a VERY odd placing given that Emily has come out and said she's big enough to headline. I don't buy it.

She'd be a compelling act against Kanye, though. They need somebody of headliner status to go up against him, in some ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

someone has told me today that Flo is headlining the other stage.

I've no idea if it's true, tho.

that would be a pretty odd turn of events - she may not be as huge as she was when she left off, but that's a pretty sizeable step down. subbing somebody like Prince, though not headlining, isn't something you can complain about. headlining the second stage is admitting 'well my chances of ever headlining are gone'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

someone has told me today that Flo is headlining the other stage.

I've no idea if it's true, tho.

If it were, it would suggest a major name on the Pyramid with Flo being a device to split the crowds/manage the volumes (or it might not, but that was my initial thought)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it were, it would suggest a major name on the Pyramid with Flo being a device to split the crowds/manage the volumes (or it might not, but that was my initial thought)

they had bloody Chase & Status up against the Stones - it's clearly not that big of an issue to them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFL office this morning - 'We anticipate they'll be nothing revealed in the next 24 hours'. Mate emailed them.

This is interesting, what did your mate ask them in the email?

If he/she asked "Will we hear anything before the payment window closes?" then their answer is saying no to that but not promisig anything afterwards either, but if he/she asked "When will the lineup be released" then this could basically mean it'll be tomorrow....

Am I overthinking this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...