Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Why do you all hate Keane so much?

I don't hate Keane but they are probably not as popular as the Kaiserchiefs these days and they are headlining the John Peel Tent. I think that's about their level these days or mid order Other Stage. The Manics are way bigger with an amazing back catalogue and they weren't headlining. I mean even Blondie wasn't on the Pyramid stage. You have to be deluded if you think Keane are bigger than any of those bands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Eavis quote; I took it to mean the manager is British but the band aren't any more, not that one member of the band is (I think some people took it this way). Obviously the AC/DC evidence has been discussed, but I think Muse may live in LA now or something, so he could mean them. Would be better than bloody AC/DC for me anyway.

Anyway, Florence and the Machine, Fleetwood Mac, Muse/Foos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen a lot of mentions for Florence headlining, I really don't see it. 2nd top on the Pyramid or headling The Other Stage is the highest I could see her at Glastonbury, unless I'm missing something.

Edited by Alan_C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen a lot of mentions for Florence headlining, I really don't see it. 2nd top on the Pyramid or headling The Other Stage is the highest I could see her at Glastonbury, unless I'm missing something.

she's been 'away' for a while so she's off everybody's radar. once the new album is released i reckon she'll shoot right back up there, although that said, i don't particularly see it yet either. maybe after one more album, but would just seem too soon come the next one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I agree if Florence's next album is popular she could do it. Her first 2 albums must have been as popular as Mumford's were and they headlined?

Mumfords took over the world with their second album. Florence didn't quite do that and her second album was a bit of a flop compared to her first

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mumfords took over the world with their second album. Florence didn't quite do that and her second album was a bit of a flop compared to her first

Does the global success matter too much so long as it's popular in the UK?

Perhaps a sub slot or an Other stage headliner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Eavis quote; I took it to mean the manager is British but the band aren't any more, not that one member of the band is (I think some people took it this way). Obviously the AC/DC evidence has been discussed, but I think Muse may live in LA now or something, so he could mean them. Would be better than bloody AC/DC for me anyway.

Anyway, Florence and the Machine, Fleetwood Mac, Muse/Foos.

Eavis nearly always get's his teasing info bits a little bit wrong...

With this in mind the "English Singer" reference could be Christine McVie - who's recently rejoined Fleetwood Mac. Although Mike and John are also English, because of Stevie and Lindsey most people assume them to be and American band.

Therefore I think he coule be talking about Fleetwood Mac.

As for people banging on about Florence and Keane. Both acts are very dependent on their next album sales etc and I don't think Eavis would book them a year ahead without knowing this. Elbow were looking a cert to headline a year or so ago, but new album/ singles don't cause a massive stir and therefore second from top..

Edited by danbailey80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the global success matter too much so long as it's popular in the UK?

Perhaps a sub slot or an Other stage headliner?

her second album was also a bit of a flop in the UK. still got to number one etc but didn't seem to take off (nor the singles) as much as the first album due to it's slightly darker / less pop sound

Pyramid sub is where i'd put her (although hopefully not under Fleetwood Mac - that'd be a bit on the nose). but who knows, another festival might snatch her up as a headliner - reckon TITP / V would give her a punt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we have to have Adele and Fleetwood, then we must have Kanye as well, 2 boring headliners must be balanced out by Yeezy. The only alternative I can think of, is if the Eavii work a miracle and manage to wrangle Daft Punk. V and T can have the Foos and the Chillis.

Also, the idea of Keane is hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

her second album was also a bit of a flop in the UK. still got to number one etc but didn't seem to take off (nor the singles) as much as the first album due to it's slightly darker / less pop sound

Pyramid sub is where i'd put her (although hopefully not under Fleetwood Mac - that'd be a bit on the nose). but who knows, another festival might snatch her up as a headliner - reckon TITP / V would give her a punt

Florence's second album did a lot better in the charts across the world than the first, but that was mainly down to her being relatively unknown when starting. In the UK though the first album did do better singles and album sales than the first.

Edit: That being said I don't think she will be the headliner the eavi currently have 'booked' but will be more of a sub and bump up if one of these headliners pulls out.

Edited by cwaite123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take what Eavis senior says with a truckload of salt. He was frequently wrong about 2014, or at least right at the time but ultimately incorrect.

Yep. There's no chance him and this agent progressed through all the stages of a headliner booking on Saturday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eavis nearly always get's his teasing info bits a little bit wrong...

With this in mind the "English Singer" reference could be Christine McVie - who's recently rejoined Fleetwood Mac. Although Mike and John are also English, because of Stevie and Lindsey most people assume them to be and American band.

Therefore I think he coule be talking about Fleetwood Mac.

As for people banging on about Florence and Keane. Both acts are very dependent on their next album sales etc and I don't think Eavis would book them a year ahead without knowing this. Elbow were looking a cert to headline a year or so ago, but new album/ singles don't cause a massive stir and therefore second from top..

Yeah but I don't think Christine McVie is a he. From the way I read it I'm certain he meant the agent is British.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it'l be any of these really, but i'm also gonna say why I think they may not. (In brackets is why I think they may not do it.)

Radiohead - New album, and a very long overdue return... (Maybe too long, has the wait hype dwindled?)

Fleetwood Mac - Definite, they are TBA on the rumours page already. (Unless one gets ill again)

Florence + The Machine - New album, goes every year regardless (Maybe she isn't ready?)

Others to consider

Foo Fighters - Could, but I just doubt it.

AC/DC - Nah I think we're pulling straws

Muse - Potentially, but it feels too soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

people thinking it's gonna be AC/DC a year after Metallica is just like everybody assuming it was gonna be Lady Gaga in 2013 / Kanye West in 2009 etc. just because they opened the door for new genres to headline doesn't mean the festival is gonna jump and book every act of that genre to headline in the years following. it might happen (never say never), but i doubt it

if Radiohead have a new album out next year (have they even begun to write / record?) then the festival would really be dropping the ball not booking them, but they'll be rumoured every year until they finally play again (and then a couple of years later rumoured all over again). i just need to see them headline Glastonbury!

Edited by FloorFiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as a heads up one of the bands is from this list, if the rumour it was Peter Mensch that was watching Metallica with Eavis on Saturday night:

(ordered most to least likely band)

Muse
Red Hot Chili Peppers
Three Days Grace
Dawes
Silversun Pickups
POP ETC
Gillian Welch
Cage The Elephant
Rachele Royale
Ximena Sariñana
Baroness
Bear Hands
Metallica
So in all likelihood Muse or the Chillis.
There's an outside chance of him booking QPrime artists The Black Keys or Foals through Peter Mensch, despite them not being managed by Mensch himself.
He could of course have had another band manager from a different company watching on his other side, or behind him and be talking about a totally different set of artists.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

there were already rumours of Muse being in talks to do it next year so could well (unfortunately) be them. still seems a little too soon to me but considering Glastonbury had a big part in their rise it's definitely possible

not gonna be the Chili Peppers. why would the festival book them now and not at their peak? (yes, they had a peak)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...