Jump to content

Films


Rufus Gwertigan
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, ThomThomDrum said:

Cadwalladr's rant in the Guardian was just that. An annoying read of a rant. I did not find it funny at all. Just perplexing at times and tiring at others. Her ramblings of ISIS grated and her feminist POV is as desperate as Pinkett Smith's and Lee's new Oscar racism card. 

The ISIS thing is silly, but her point is valid: the film and the central performance exist as nothing but monuments to the conditions of their making. 

And it's not exactly 'playing the race card' to point out how painfully white the OScars are. they can't even do their 'I have a black friend, honest' nominations right; the people they nominated for Creed and Straight Outta Compton are all white.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair SOC was a good film, but nothing oscar worthy.  It would frankly be more intolerant for films to not be judged upon their merit but on their social makeup.  It's much like the women in music debate, whether you consider that affirmative action is a necessary and effective solution, I would think that most people don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Spindles said:

To be fair SOC was a good film, but nothing oscar worthy.  It would frankly be more intolerant for films to not be judged upon their merit but on their social makeup.  It's much like the women in music debate, whether you consider that affirmative action is a necessary and effective solution, I would think that most people don't.

Oh I agree, SOC doesn't deserve a screenplay nod, but here's my fun Oscars fact I like to pull out at this time of year:

Meryl Streep has more Best Actress nominations than black women do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think she also has about 8 extra bones in her spine and drinks stem cell smoothies, but then I do have some odd ideas about people.

I think mrs Smith is just sore because hubby didn't get a nod for his 'serious' piece in a year when he's reportedly asking ludicrous money to appear in anything that mass audiences would watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But are black actors undeservedly not get nominated for roles in which they should obviously get nominated for, or are there still very few black actors getting main roles in Hollywood?  

Are the Oscar nominations racist or is it simply the western film industry that is still dominated by them there white folk? 

Smith does not deserve a nom for concussion IMO. And its not as if the Oscars have not acknowledged him in the past with his performances deemed worthy. Its stark that there are no black noms this year, but who are those that obviously deserve them this year and are being shunned? Defo not Smith IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ThomThomDrum said:

But are black actors undeservedly not get nominated for roles in which they should obviously get nominated for, or are there still very few black actors getting main roles in Hollywood?  

Are the Oscar nominations racist or is it simply the western film industry that is still dominated by them there white folk? 

Both. Each factor informs the other to some degree. I don't get why people seem to be so against people pointing this out. Since when was pointing out that the Oscars are nonsense a problem? Even if Smith is complaining for selfish reasons, it doesn't make her wrong.

 

17 minutes ago, ThomThomDrum said:

Its stark that there are no black noms this year, but who are those that obviously deserve them this year and are being shunned? Defo not Smith IMO. 

Didn't think Beasts of No Nation was all that as a film, but its two central performances are a hell of a lot more impressive than the majority of this year's Actor and Supporting actor shortlists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barry Fish said:


Am I missing anything else ?  Just wondering if there is another really scary scene I have forgot about ?  I don't think so...  The rest is just the same as the other movies.

Han dying was pretty hard on me =p 

Nothing I can remember, agreed most of it apart from the Rathtar scene isn't any worse than the other movies (and that has plenty of warning without missing to much story). Maybe the Kylo Ren/Rey torture scene? and I guess depends on your kid, but Snoke could maybe a bit much for them?

 

Speaking of Star Wars, VIII has been pushed back to a December released, bit gutted as I really want to know what happens...but I guess in the grand scheme of  Star Wars films, its not that long to wait :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think TFA has anything as near as strong as the scenes you mention from RotS (which I agree could be nightmare fodder for a young lady of that age, so good shout) and the monsters eating everyone bit is well tempered with comedic moments enough to take the edge off for younger viewers with the whole sequence reminding me of something you might see in an episode of Doctor Who (there was certainly plenty of running and any actual violence was suggested and offscreen).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Barry Fish said:

It doesn't include Phantom Menace so that was a no no...  She loved the Phantom Menace :P  Whatever adults think about it, kids love it :) 

Ah the beauty is, that you go back to it afterwards for kids/general amusement. A bit like the "A Star Wars Story" films will be =p

Tbh though, I wish you could Attack of the Clones out of it, I guess you could just watch The Clone Wars =p

 

I was 10 for TPM and did love it at the time, had all the lego for it and everything =p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id say this race thing could be a boost for the Oscars in the end and the boycott could actually have the opposite effect of what it should wrt viewing numbers. The Oscars is on the radar more than ever this year because of it and a lot of people are extremely interested to see what Chris Rock does hosting it under the shadow of all this. It could potentially get bumper viewers as a result, rather than less.............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ThomThomDrum said:

Id say this race thing could be a boost for the Oscars in the end and the boycott could actually have the opposite effect of what it should wrt viewing numbers. The Oscars is on the radar more than ever this year because of it and a lot of people are extremely interested to see what Chris Rock does hosting it under the shadow of all this. It could potentially get bumper viewers as a result, rather than less.............

To be fair a boycott that didn't draw attention to the thing being boycotted would be pretty pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO.. Straight out of Compton isn't great and doesn't deserve best pic, haven't seen the will smith one so can't comment.

Creed though does look a bit dodgy. I know films normally get nominations in clusters from different categories, the first rocky I believe got 10 and this I would say hold its own against the original. Creed has got one from I guess a possible 4:

Best Director: Ryan Coogler (black)

Best Actor: Michael Jordan (black)

Best Supporting Actor: Stallone (white)

Best Supporting Actress: Tessa Thompson (black)

If I was going to pick one of those it probably wouldn't be Stallone. 

Edited by lost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

creed is fucking dreadful, no-one deserves any recognition for it. comparing it to the likes of the revenant displays a huge lack of understanding of the art of film making.

creed is popcorn, and if you like that kind of thing - fine, but no serious person could say it stands alongside other oscar winners in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • Nope, NEC "" Asked if Abbott will be allowed to run on behalf of Labour, Starmer replies: "She is free to go forward as a Labour candidate, the whip is back with her, it's been restored." But he reminds reporters that it is "formally a matter for the NEC" but he has not expressed a view until now and reiterates Abbott is free to run as a Labour candidate.""
    • It's 15kg!! Would be some effort to carry that for 1-2 miles even if you were relatively fit and strong.
    • I'm a massive Oasis and NG fan...I don't think I ever want to meet him!   2015, a few of us congregated post-headliners, we'd watched Leftfield at the Sonic stage and my mates missus and her friends had been to see Kayne West....got everyone together then went to see DJ EZ in the dance field....tent was pretty full and we were stood in and around the edge at the back of the tent, fine to hear it and dance but didn't quite feel we were part of it as we were on the edge....which was where the viewing platform/sound booth was....   Two minutes before he came on Rio Ferdinand appeared with his 'crew' trying to get in, but couldn't get to where he wanted to be as it was rammed so he got his guys to form a circle with him in the middle, and they pushed their way through the crowd to get to the back viewing platform...I only realised it was him when I got pushed hard to get out of the way and turned round to see him and his mate right in front of me acting the big 'I am' (walking like a boxer coming into the ring)  , bloke behind me said 'he doesn't look too bothered given his wife has just died of cancer'   utter c**t.
    • COPIED AND PASTED Rachel Reeves has said a Labour government would not raise taxes beyond a handful of measures she has already set out, limiting the party’s room for manoeuvre if it wins the UK general election on July 4. The shadow chancellor on Tuesday also ruled out the idea of a swift Budget, hinting that the first major fiscal event under a Labour government would not occur until September at the earliest. The main opposition party, which is guarding a poll lead of about 20 points, is keen to project its economic credentials and win over British business. Following her first big speech of the election campaign at a Rolls-Royce factory in Derby, Reeves was asked whether Labour would need to put up any taxes to ease pressures on Britain’s public services. “There are no additional tax rises needed beyond the ones that I’ve said,” she added.  Her comment marked a hardening of Labour’s position on tax rises as the party grapples with questions over how it would address spending priorities from social care to struggling councils and overflowing prisons.  On Sunday she ruled out rises to income tax or national insurance, the two main taxes levied on people’s earnings.  Sir Keir Starmer, Labour leader, said on Monday that all of his party’s policies were fully costed. “We have gone through all of our plans and none of them require us to raise taxes,” he said. But Reeves has gone further with her promise of “no additional tax rises”. She said Labour’s only increases in tax would be the ones the party has already set out. Such measures include extending the windfall tax on energy companies’ profits, imposing VAT on private school fees and ensuring private equity bonuses are “taxed appropriately”.  The Conservative government has pencilled in years of fiscal restraint after the election, which would mean real-terms cuts to non-protected government departments including transport, local government and justice.  Last week the Institute for Fiscal Studies said the next government would have to choose between cutting spending, raising taxes or borrowing more to address a hole in Britain’s public finances.   “The parties might well be reluctant to tell us which of these they would opt for upon taking office. That doesn’t mean that we should refrain from asking them,” the think-tank said. Reeves also signalled that a Labour government would not deliver a Budget until mid-September at the earliest. She said an emergency “fiscal event” before the summer would not allow the Office for Budget Responsibility, the fiscal watchdog, to prepare accompanying forecasts.  “The OBR requires 10 weeks’ notice to provide an independent forecast ahead of a Budget and I’ve been really clear that I would not deliver a fiscal event without an OBR forecast,” she said. Recommended UK politics opinion polls UK general election poll tracker Labour also won the backing of 120 business executives in a letter to The Times this week, an apparent endorsement of the party’s promise to restore “stability” to the UK economy if it wins the election. In their letter, the current and former business chiefs endorsed Labour and criticised the Conservatives’ handling of the economy, which they said had been “beset by instability, stagnation and a lack of long-term focus”.  Signatories included Andy Palmer, former chief executive of carmaker Aston Martin; John Holland-Kaye, former chief of Heathrow airport; Andrew Higginson, chair of retailer JD Sports; and Charles Harman, a former vice-chair at JPMorgan Cazenove.  Reeves said in her speech that Labour had changed for good and would run Britain as a “pro-business, pro-worker” party if it won the election.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...