Jump to content

2013 Headliners


Guest shangri-la_steward
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

She doesn't have to do songs with him though, give him the oxygen of publicity when she could instead be a powerful voice against domestic violence.

We could all use our voices to make a better world, very few of us do.

There's nowt more depressing for me personally than to log on here and see endless posts by today's generations of unashamedly right wing c**ts who cannot think beyond their own greed. ;)

So you want Rihanna to do what you won't, but she won't. Go figure ;)

Controversy sells though as her marketing people are no doubt aware.
it does, but only to morons.
Its him I dislike not her.
Really? Despite you suggesting that it's her who needs to do something about Brown's violence?

FFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could all use our voices to make a better world, very few of us do.

There's nowt more depressing for me personally than to log on here and see endless posts by today's generations of unashamedly right wing c**ts who cannot think beyond their own greed. ;)

So you want Rihanna to do what you won't, but she won't. Go figure ;)

it does, but only to morons.

Really? Despite you suggesting that it's her who needs to do something about Brown's violence?

FFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However it was Rihanna's choice to go so public with it,

no it wasn't. It was all over the net and the papers before she'd even finished being treated by a doc for her injuries.

But then to be so public about their reunion, i mean she tweeted pictures of them in bed together sends the wrong message. Then to have te nerve to say it's nobodies business is just laughable

so it's wrong for any person to like and enjoy time with the person they love? :blink:

Rihanna doesn't get my approval for getting back with him but she's far from the first woman to go back to her abuser.

The fact of her doing that just gets to show that she doesn't understand that she's a victim and Brown is an abuser.

Your words get to show that you don't understand she's a victim either.

Hate the abuser, not the abused. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no it wasn't. It was all over the net and the papers before she'd even finished being treated by a doc for her injuries.

so it's wrong for any person to like and enjoy time with the person they love? :blink:

Rihanna doesn't get my approval for getting back with him but she's far from the first woman to go back to her abuser.

The fact of her doing that just gets to show that she doesn't understand that she's a victim and Brown is an abuser.

Your words get to show that you don't understand she's a victim either.

Hate the abuser, not the abused. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no it wasn't. It was all over the net and the papers before she'd even finished being treated by a doc for her injuries.

so it's wrong for any person to like and enjoy time with the person they love? :blink:

Rihanna doesn't get my approval for getting back with him but she's far from the first woman to go back to her abuser.

The fact of her doing that just gets to show that she doesn't understand that she's a victim and Brown is an abuser.

Your words get to show that you don't understand she's a victim either.

Hate the abuser, not the abused. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

could mumford sub the stones and be the back up

that's my hunch right now.

If Glasto have Mumfords for Sunday then Glasto wouldn't have needed to go around lots of acts to ask them if they could headline the Sunday.

To me, there's an awful lot about Mumfords in the spot before the Stones and stepping up to headliner if there is no stones which makes an awful lot of sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if Mumfords are in fact the 'back up' for the Stones then surely the Sunday headliner would have to be somebody absolutely spectacular considering Arctics + Mumfords seems pretty damn weak (in my eyes, anyway)

a part of me thinks Mumfords are the third headliner, but then i think 'would they really get Mumfords to close the festival?'. maybe it's because i'm looking at it through the eyes of an absolute non-fan of Mumfords, but they seem like a piss poor way to close Glastonbury

*just noticed Dizzee Rascal as a SR for the Sunday. where's this come from? headlining? if so and the Stones pull out, Arctics, Mumfords and Dizzee may be the poorest set of headliners Glastonbury has had in a long time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could all use our voices to make a better world, very few of us do.There's nowt more depressing for me personally than to log on here and see endless posts by today's generations of unashamedly right wing c**ts who cannot think beyond their own greed. ;)So you want Rihanna to do what you won't, but she won't. Go figure ;)it does, but only to morons.Really? Despite you suggesting that it's her who needs to do something about Brown's violence?FFS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if Mumfords are in fact the 'back up' for the Stones then surely the Sunday headliner would have to be somebody absolutely spectacular considering Arctics + Mumfords seems pretty damn weak (in my eyes, anyway)

a part of me thinks Mumfords are the third headliner, but then i think 'would they really get Mumfords to close the festival?'. maybe it's because i'm looking at it through the eyes of an absolute non-fan of Mumfords, but they seem like a piss poor way to close Glastonbury

*just noticed Dizzee Rascal as a SR for the Sunday. where's this come from? headlining? if so and the Stones pull out, Arctics, Mumfords and Dizzee may be the poorest set of headliners Glastonbury has had in a long time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...