Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2013 Headliners


Guest shangri-la_steward

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Surely the Stones have to be nailed on, if not I would take either Fleetwood Mac or Prince (although he has been bitching Glastonbury recently) that would be Sunday taken care of. I just can not see it being Radiohead think it will be one of Muse/Arctics/Arcade Fire/Kasabian. Sandwiched in the middle it's going to be a more pop type act and I can only see it being GaGa ... Which to be honest wouldn't be that bad !!!

And re the whole Frank Turner argument I can not see where all this negativity towards him has come from?? Seen him live a couple of times now and never fails to deliver, think he will be fairly high up on the Other stage and rightly so !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id love to see headliners who aren't business people. U2 aren't a band anymore. Just a front for a company, as is Beyonce, Jay-Z etc, Lady Gaga and a lot of the people being mentioned in this thread.

Where the fuck are all the musicians? I thought I was paying to see a gig?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id love to see headliners who aren't business people. U2 aren't a band anymore. Just a front for a company, as is Beyonce, Jay-Z etc, Lady Gaga and a lot of the people being mentioned in this thread.

Where the fuck are all the musicians? I thought I was paying to see a gig?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shes one of the very very worst. Theres always been money making pop, but this new thing about releasing perfumes and clothes and dildos and strap ons and the like (not sure if the last two exist on second thought) is as vulgar as it gets.

What it means is that the "music" these "artists" release is basically a jingle for their brand/company. Fucking useless.

Its like going to see Ronald McDonald whistle the Mickey D's "Lovin it" jingle.

Edited by chriseede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely diagree. Who are you to say that she doesn't enjoy making music and see it as her own way of creating art? Just because it's pop music and she's exploiting her popularity by launching other products, doesn't mean she's simply making music for that reason. Furthermore, I'll assume you'll include your beloved Rolling Stones in this list of musicians?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's probably talking about the whole saturation of it all.

Maybe the fact that Beyonce's management sit down and choose a target audience, then they get people to write songs that will sell to that target audience, and no surprises, that audience falls for it hip, line and sinker. It's an absolutely disgusting way to go about being an artist. Making music solely for the purpose of making cash. Anyone involved in that side of the industry, including the artist herself, has no soul at all, and they take out everything that being a musician should be about.

Edited by chriseede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • 👍 plus they brought their own screens 📺 either side of the stage.
    • Production was the only thing that could even explain why she would back out. Like they had sorted out the financials and she was fine with it and then a production meeting happened. It all fell apart. It was very clear that she was not going to compromise her show one bit and then that show in Brazil pretty much confirmed it. There was like one element they couldnt pull off outdoors, but it was negligible since the rest was a carbon copy of the tour she had been on. Glasto is not willing to make any bold changes on the Pyramid stage so then theyre kinda stuck in terms of what some acts want/demand. I think the easiest solution to that is putting her on Friday. You deal with the changes for one night and then re configure for the rest of the weekend. In 24 they were fortunate to have had Dua and Coldplay on Fri and Sat so they could both use the b stage. But I think it was removed for Sunday?     I saw a random rag article earlier that said Olivia Dean turned down Glasto BECAUSE her ex ( not even confirmed dating ) Harry Styles was playing the fest. hahahaha
    • No argument that he’s bigger than ever, I just have no enthusiasm for it.
    • Keep in mind those crowds were full of teenagers. Glasto aint full of teenagers. Theres no way she could demand headline and get it because they got other acts to give the slot to who deserve it with a bigger catalog. Reading/Leeds would headline her cause its still LN.  If the fest was struggling its Other headline. But a 3rd down Pyramid is likely the landing spot. Itll go down like the Camila Cabello performance pretty much.
    • Norwich times if anyone is interested 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...