Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

The Stokes are, dare I say it, a touch too unreliable as a live prospect in the current day and age.


Especially for the coin they charge. They can be really great or total sh*t. Judging by the last time I saw them (TRNSMT 2022) both within the same gig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/31/2024 at 7:15 AM, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

I'm more taking issue with Master Shake's contention that all hell will break loose in the unprecedented situation of 3 young headliners

 

(when it happened relatively frequently in the 90s / early 00s and noone batted an eyelid)


 

nobody gave any f**ks when it was guitar bands. Now youre going into electronic and pop acts getting in there and the core  base is scared shitless yet again that somebody even like Sam Fender will be few and far between of guitar artists being at the top of the bill. I wonder if the old guard  saw the Primavera trio and are sweating bullets that Emily wouldve wanted that herself to make her vision come true despite it likely alienating a lot of folks. Glasto is losing its crutch of "old" acts and they have to adapt one way or another. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw the Strokes once, when they co-headlined Leeds/Reading luckily at Leeds where Stokes were on first.  Very average performance looked like they wanted to get though it quickly as they could.  Followed by Pulp who as im sure most of us know are a fantastic live act - wiped the floor with them Jarvis and Julien are different ends of charisma spectrum.   Feel sorry for those at Reading when Stokes came on second.

 

Big fan of the first three albums but - (IMO) all the strokes albums after than I think have been pretty poor compared. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

Big fan of the first three albums but - (IMO) all the strokes albums after than I think have been pretty poor compared. 

 

Surely you don't think that about The New Abnormal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Suprefan said:


 

nobody gave any f**ks when it was guitar bands. Now youre going into electronic and pop acts getting in there and the core  base is scared shitless yet again that somebody even like Sam Fender will be few and far between of guitar artists being at the top of the bill. I wonder if the old guard  saw the Primavera trio and are sweating bullets that Emily wouldve wanted that herself to make her vision come true despite it likely alienating a lot of folks. Glasto is losing its crutch of "old" acts and they have to adapt one way or another. 


or they just keep doing what they do? A nice mixture of genres, fresh artists and old guard when possible.

 

if you really think Emily wanted Chappell/XCX and Sabrina as 2025 pyramid headliners, then you're a little crazy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ben7amin_ said:

Saw the Strokes once, when they co-headlined Leeds/Reading luckily at Leeds where Stokes were on first.  Very average performance looked like they wanted to get though it quickly as they could.  Followed by Pulp who as im sure most of us know are a fantastic live act - wiped the floor with them Jarvis and Julien are different ends of charisma spectrum.   Feel sorry for those at Reading when Stokes came on second.

 

Big fan of the first three albums but - (IMO) all the strokes albums after than I think have been pretty poor compared. 

Tbf this just makes me think of my regret of not doing the full weekend at Reading 2011. I came on the Sunday to see Muse doing Origin in full, and had a great time seeing Friendly Fires before them, but there are many acts on the first two days I've since gone on to see, including Strokes and Pulp themselves.

 

Pulp's Reading 2011 set looked so great on YouTube. Strokes one looked fine but feels like it may have suffered by having to follow the blast beforehand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Superscally said:

The Strokes were off the chain good at All Points East. Apparently there were sound issues, but not where we were...

I found the 2019 sound quite iffy but was better at the back of the standing area, weirdly.

 

It wasn't really great on the second stage for Interpol or Courtney Barnett either, I found.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Superscally said:

The Strokes were off the chain good at All Points East. Apparently there were sound issues, but not where we were...

I worked that and we blagged it in to the VIP pit at the front left and the sound was chest pressingly immense! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, charlierc said:

I found the 2019 sound quite iffy but was better at the back of the standing area, weirdly.

 

It wasn't really great on the second stage for Interpol or Courtney Barnett either, I found.

I was at 23... Yeah Yeah Yeahs were immense. If they could do a threepeat on the Pyramid of Interpol into YYYs, maybe even with BRMC before Interpol, I'd sell a kidney for that.

3 minutes ago, stuie said:

I worked that and we blagged it in to the VIP pit at the front left and the sound was chest pressingly immense! 

Insert Napoleon Dynamite *LUCKY* meme here ❤️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Strokes are the only band I've seen at TRNSMT when I've thought "that was f**king terrible".

 

Seen em in 2002, on Glasgow Green again btw, and it was definitely better, but they were essentially filling a headline set with one album and some unfinished new stuff.

Edited by DomDom1984
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Superscally said:

I was at 23... Yeah Yeah Yeahs were immense. If they could do a threepeat on the Pyramid of Interpol into YYYs, maybe even with BRMC before Interpol, I'd sell a kidney for that.

The full-on Meet Me in the Bathroom slot eh

 

I wouldn't strictly be opposed to that tbf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DomDom1984 said:

Seen em in 2002, on Glasgow Green again btw, and it was definitely better, but they were essentially filling a headline set with one album and some unfinished new stuff.

 

I was at that one - my second time seeing em but definitely the point where I twigged that they just didn't really have the juice as a live act.

 

Good line-up though - White Stripes, Jane's Addiction, Pulp and The Strokes back to back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

I was at that one - my second time seeing em but definitely the point where I twigged that they just didn't really have the juice as a live act.

 

Good line-up though - White Stripes, Jane's Addiction, Pulp and The Strokes back to back.

 

The Polyphonic Spree early on too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

 

I'd forgotten about them - and they're not on the poster - but you're quite right. Also The Vines at the very pinnacle of their month-long period of hype and indie stardom.

 

Unexpected highlight of the weekend was Flogging Molly taking a late switch onto Saturday main stage and putting on a glorious wee set. 

 

What a delightful first festival that was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, charlierc said:

Tbf this just makes me think of my regret of not doing the full weekend at Reading 2011. I came on the Sunday to see Muse doing Origin in full, and had a great time seeing Friendly Fires before them, but there are many acts on the first two days I've since gone on to see, including Strokes and Pulp themselves.

 

Pulp's Reading 2011 set looked so great on YouTube. Strokes one looked fine but feels like it may have suffered by having to follow the blast beforehand.


I was there all weekend and that’s pretty much a perfect summary of how that Saturday panned out 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is, if it's not Stevie or Eminem or Rihanna (with the latter two having given the finger to the paltry fee) then there aren't many other names in the vicinity that scream Glastonbury headliner.
 

I dunno if they'll want a re-run of last year where they hoist someone up a level and it doesn't pan out 

 

Maybe we've been too hasty to write off Green Day.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...