Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot said:

 

Yes, and her pop punk sound will likely be appreciated by the nostalgia crowd.

 

I think either of Fontaines DC or Yungblud fit nicely under her.

51 minutes ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

I could see The Cure as a potential repeat if they want an old-school act in 2028. Would tie in for fifty years.

I don't see The Cure as thinking of Glastonbury as a need for a last ever gig.

Edited by northernangel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, gfa said:

To play devils advocate, isn't a 'tight' band also choreographed within a inch of it's life


how about just being really good at what you do. Green Day is such a "tight" band that  at one awards show they threw in an anti nazi song into their medley and nobody had a clue it was gonna happen cause they didnt run through it at soundcheck the day before.  But they had it locked into where they would do it and left the producers dumbfounded.
 

I dont think anyone realizes how good you have to be to even get into a major  artists' backing band. Did nobody see how many people made submissions for Smashing Pumpkins last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Justcalledtosay said:

 

She's from California?


you didnt seethe tour leg she just did in asia and what she did for her Manilla show did ya. Yeah, part Filipino so its def gonna be a thing that can get raised. Im sure because she doesnt look a certain way its more palatable for people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Suprefan said:


you didnt seethe tour leg she just did in asia and what she did for her Manilla show did ya. Yeah, part Filipino so its def gonna be a thing that can get raised. Im sure because she doesnt look a certain way its more palatable for people. 


Or nobody gives a sh*t. Yeah that will be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Suprefan said:


you didnt seethe tour leg she just did in asia and what she did for her Manilla show did ya. Yeah, part Filipino so its def gonna be a thing that can get raised. Im sure because she doesnt look a certain way its more palatable for people. 


We’re not America, dude. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone who runs a Harry Styles fan account slid into my DMs the other day. Not one of the monster ones but 30k followers.

 

They were taking about that Sun article that had him headlining, said they don't normally pay much attention to The Sun but the journalist that wrote it does have a good track record with HS stuff, thinks she may have a connection to his management. They also pointed out that Styles' Creative Director recently followed Emily on Instagram. 

 

If it's O Rod and Fred, I can't see HS being number 3 but I thought it was worth mentioning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Gnomicide said:

Someone who runs a Harry Styles fan account slid into my DMs the other day. Not one of the monster ones but 30k followers.

 

They were taking about that Sun article that had him headlining, said they don't normally pay much attention to The Sun but the journalist that wrote it does have a good track record with HS stuff, thinks she may have a connection to his management. They also pointed out that Styles' Creative Director recently followed Emily on Instagram. 

 

If it's O Rod and Fred, I can't see HS being number 3 but I thought it was worth mentioning. 

You would really have a clear direction that the festival want to go full on pop with that lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glastonbury wouldn't be Glastonbury if it had booked 40 years of pop pap.  Not a fan of pop pap. 

 

(Yes to Hazza though)

Edited by stuie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

The Harry Styles story comes out every year.  So i automatically disbelieve it.

 

Probably have to happen at some point though.  

 

Does it really though?  Lots of chat about him being a special guest in 2022 which obviously didn't pan out, but his tourdates in 23 ruled him out early on - and given he was on a well publicised break this year I don't think anyone was really expecting it.

 

TBH it's his last tour being such a monster that makes me doubt him for next year - but if Emily has convinced him to do G25 as a one off then fair play to her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...