Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, mattiloy said:

One thing that has struck me living in Sweden is that I’m just not as invested or engaged in the politics news cycle over here as I was in the uk politics/news cycle - I’ve got sort of 3/4 of a foot in the uk and 1/4 of a foot in Sweden in terms of engagement.

Today by chance I heard about a change in a law proposed by the right wing govt to reform the strandskydd law (shoreline protection law) which prevents new building within a few hundred metres of the shoreline.

Since this is something that I am really strongly against, and how I only heard about it by chance, it dawned on my how out of touch with it all I am here. And then it dawned on me how now I’m like an average Joe out of touch guy in the uk but here, if you catch my drift.

Basically, I am just grasping how difficult it is to reach most of the population. Most things wont cut through. I’m a busy dad of a 2 year old and a foreigner so I dont keep abreast of everything but I am nonetheless very interested and want to be as informed as possible. And yet important things can pass me by.

So I thought about my own job in the bank. Whenever we change our rates or terms and conditions we are obliged to directly inform our customers. Often it is at great expense as we have to send physical letters out to most.

Why should governments be any different?

Why should we have to consume basically all the news, scroll endlessly through twitter, to find out whats changing with the laws in our countries?

I think if each outgoing government had to produce a physical document describing all the changes they’d made to laws and deliver that into the postboxes of every citizen in the country well ahead of election day they wouldnt get away with half of much shite as they do.

That's a really interesting way of looking at it and something I'd never thought of. 

It would totally transform the relationship between government and country. I guess there would still be plenty of people who wouldn't engage but it would make it easier for those who want to. Problem is, governments quite like getting away with the shite they do so no one would bring in such a change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

COP 28 close to being a failure. It isn't just oil companies and petrostates thwarting it, it is developing countries...when they develop rapidly they need a lot of energy...and they want certain guarantees. China and India are producing more CO2 than anyone else, but when you look at CO2 per capita N America, N Europe, Russia and Australia are right up there. The problem is poorer countries wanting what richer countries have, and the fact there's just too many people.

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steviewevie said:

there. The problem is poorer countries wanting what richer countries have, and the fact there's just too many people.

Ironically the best way of saving the planet is by letting global warming do its thing and wipe out the vast majority of the human race. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Due to the complicated politics in the middle east you would also think the petro-states are worried about different groups/sects in their countries being able to exploit any turmoil whilst these countries re-invented their economies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Punksnotdead said:

This not-so-Cleverly bloke really is an appalling speaker - "Er, um, I will make progress, er, um, um".

Mind you, it must be difficult to speak clearly when you think the bill is "batshit crazy"! 

Cooper in response seems absolutely switched on 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, steviewevie said:

The problem is poorer countries wanting what richer countries have, and the fact there's just too many people.

The problem is greed. There's more than enough resources for all people to live a comfortable (not luxurious) life. We need to seriously reassess our priorities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, squirrelarmy said:

Ironically the best way of saving the planet is by letting global warming do its thing and wipe out the vast majority of the human race. 

I troll conspiracy pages. There is a good proportion of the population that believe depopulation is happening now. f**k Bill Gates and the WEF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Skip997 said:

The problem is greed. There's more than enough resources for all people to live a comfortable (not luxurious) life. We need to seriously reassess our priorities.

problem is most people in developed countries probably don't even think they're being greedy, they're just getting by. But poorer countries that are developing want the same things...which means building lots, which means lots of energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...