Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, steviewevie said:

the big uptick of those coming in with work visas since 2022 is down to health/social care workers...so not sure this salary cap affects many of those, but this dependents ruling will.

Image

 

there's a lot of social care visas being issued to non-social care workers - its being used as a scam somehow, not sure how, it might be other job applicants putting social care as they think a visa is more likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, fred quimby said:

There are a few European countries watching how we do. 

sadly we're going to let cleverly back in. 😞 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

The Rwanda thing is a bit embarrassing really but it does call out the "asylum seekers" for what they mostly are.  If you was genuinely fleeing persecution you would just want to be safe which Rwanda would offer.  The reality is a vast chunk of them are just economic migrants who will be a drain on our system.  

Maybe they are fleeing persecution but would also like some prospects of being able to build a life.

Process them and let them work. 

We have a long history of economic migrants being good for this country. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barry Fish said:

The Rwanda thing is a bit embarrassing really but it does call out the "asylum seekers" for what they mostly are.  If you was genuinely fleeing persecution you would just want to be safe which Rwanda would offer.  The reality is a vast chunk of them are just economic migrants who will be a drain on our system.  

Economic migrants largely come to the UK to work. They arrive seeking gainful employment, and the UK's economy gains from their arrivals. Their applications take months and often years to process because the Tory's processing system is not fit for purpose, and all the while they receive minimal financial support and are not allowed to work.

If there is an economic drain, it's not because of the numbers of asylum seekers (which make up a tiny proportion of new arrivals in Britain), it's because the system is incapable of processing their claims efficiently. That said, around 75% of asylum claims are granted protection early on.

Since you disagree, I'd be interested to read the official sources and statistics which substantiate your claims. Please do share.

Edited by kalifire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 minutes ago, Crazyfool01 said:

that famed safe haven of ...... Rwanda 

Not that I agree with the policy its actually safer than alot of the west.

Murder rate per 100,000 people:

Rwanda 2.5

USA 5.4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, lost said:

 

Not that I agree with the policy its actually safer than alot of the west.

Murder rate per 100,000 people:

Rwanda 2.5

USA 5.4

Come on now, let’s not do this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deporting 200 migrants to Rwanda isn’t going to do anything to ‘stop the boats’, it’s just going to endanger more people. The Tories think they can trick people into believing they are solving the issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

Deporting 200 migrants to Rwanda isn’t going to do anything to ‘stop the boats’, it’s just going to endanger more people. The Tories think they can trick people into believing they are solving the issue. 

It worked for Albanians. Very few coming over the channel now apparently.

Sorry for disagreeing with you. It seems that's not allowed on here any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ommadawn said:

It worked for Albanians. Very few coming over the channel now apparently.

Sorry for disagreeing with you. It seems that's not allowed on here any more.

So, to clarify you are supporting the Rwanda scheme?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, lost said:

 

Not that I agree with the policy its actually safer than alot of the west.

Murder rate per 100,000 people:

Rwanda 2.5

USA 5.4

So we should just accept that statistic on face value, probably from the Rwandan government?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ommadawn said:

It worked for Albanians. Very few coming over the channel now apparently.

Nothing to do with winter? 

"Sea has frozen over... that must mean Rishi's stopped the boats!"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stuie said:

So we should just accept that statistic on face value, probably from the Rwandan government?

 

When i visted Nyungwe National Park it appeared to be an upcoming country. i know most of twitter seems to think if you go anywhere near Africa the locals will put you in the pot but believe me there are some great parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

So, to clarify you are supporting the Rwanda scheme?

Not quite sure how you read that in my post but obviously not. Just saying that it could work that's all. That doesn't mean I support it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stuie said:

Nothing to do with winter? 

"Sea has frozen over... that must mean Rishi's stopped the boats!"

 

The 2 schemes are different, with the Albania deal we return Albanians to Albania. Whereas with the Rwanda deal it will be migrants from a 3rd country deported to Rwanda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

The 2 schemes are different, with the Albania deal we return Albanians to Albania. Whereas with the Rwanda deal it will be migrants from a 3rd country deported to Rwanda.

Sure, I get that.  I was responding to the number of Albanian's arriving on small boats has dropped lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ommadawn said:

Not quite sure how you read that in my post but obviously not. Just saying that it could work that's all. That doesn't mean I support it.

You literally said ‘sorry for disagreeing’ against a post that criticises the scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • People seem to have got obsessed about 'secret sets' at all festivals this year even when there aren't any spaces other than, in EOTR's case, the usual late Folly sets that 90%+ of the time are from artists who are already playing.
    • To be fair @Superscally barely mentions the running thing. Very quiet about it 😘
    • I guess we'll just have to wait until videos of the shows go up, but the fact that the standing is also greyed out still suggests to me that those sections just sold out out before the others and a blue block just be like 3 tickets left, it's still not concrete proof they never went on sale and if they were never on sale why would they not make it even, if 414 wasn't on sale then you'd think 409 wouldn't be either   
    • Selfish, but I've done the 2 days I'm there.. i'll try to do the rest through the day but might get beaten to it as it's editable....    https://clashfinder.com/s/ape2026/
    • I don’t think the festival automatically ‘need’ to have a female headliner if you have strong female headliners on the Other Stage (which I reckon will be Rosalia and Phoebe Bridgers), perhaps a female legend (praying for Annie, will take Cher), and a few female/mix gendered subs on the Pyramid (maybe London Grammar, The xx). From what I’ve seen of Sabrina, her team prioritises the pay day and I think she will be doing Wembley over Glasto weekend.   One thing I’ve noticed is a lot of the suggestions would be first time headliners and I can’t work out when the last time was that the festival had three artists top the bill that hadn’t topped it before? It seems to be something they like to do to make sure they have a ‘safe’ headliner that will land well with the masses. Plenty of names in that hat that could step back up next summer and should/could be about: Billie Eilish, Adele, Foo Fighters, The Cure, Radiohead, U2…hell, if Beyoncé is really planning to release a ‘rock n roll’ album to complete her Renaissance trilogy, Glastonbury would be a great place to ‘kick off’ that campaign for her.   And there’s always the Rihanna rumour. Her husband (I think) said this week she’s in the studio.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...