Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, lost said:

Interesting article on labours plans for the NHS:

 


Australia also with a lower median age and much less income and wealth inequality.

A large and increasing share of the NHS budget goes on managing chronic illnesses that are often basically caused by poverty.

You cant solve the NHS’ problems without solving the social problems that blight the uk, and the best way to do that is by reducing inequality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mattiloy said:

A large and increasing share of the NHS budget goes on managing chronic illnesses that are often basically caused by poverty

an awful lot isn't that, a growing proportion is going to people like me, the oldies disabled like me, long term disabilities caused by stoke (strokes happen to one in four people, mostly - but not always - in later life; i play football with a 25 year old guy who's had a stroke). this is a growing number of people currently because of the population peak. the inactivity caused by those disabilities, is going to cause an even greater amount of diabetes   - which has its own health service load.

 

these are not conditions caused by poverty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Neil said:

an awful lot isn't that, a growing proportion is going to people like me, the oldies disabled like me, long term disabilities caused by stoke (strokes happen to one in four people, mostly - but not always - in later life; i play football with a 25 year old guy who's had a stroke). this is a growing number of people currently because of the population peak. the inactivity caused by those disabilities, is going to cause an even greater amount of diabetes   - which has its own health service load.

 

these are not conditions caused by poverty

but people in poverty tend to have worse health than those that aren't...? So, it's a mix of inequality and an aging population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

but people in poverty tend to have worse health than those that aren't...? So, it's a mix of inequality and an aging population.

like cancer they're conditions caused by life, not poverty.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

but people in poverty tend to have worse health than those that aren't...? So, it's a mix of inequality and an aging population.

even fit and clean-living Olympic athlete Michael johnson had a stroke, so its not something that can be avoided with lifestyle changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steviewevie said:

Starmer says Thatcher was awesome.

Never thought I'd live to hear a Labour leader praising Margaret Thatcher. Shows how far the party has come (and also what it's left behind)

Edited by Ommadawn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, steviewevie said:

disagree...poorer people likely to have worse diets and lifestyles which can lead to cancers.

Evidence shows the same incidences of cancer at all levels of wealth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, steviewevie said:

he was writing in the Telegraph...he's hardly going to call her an evil witch.

He said she had effected "meaningful change”. What the hell did he mean by that? 3 Million unemployed, defeating the miners? Can anyone list any meaningful change that happened for the good during her premiership cos I'm struggling. As usual, Starmer didn't go into details so I'm none the wiser. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Ommadawn said:

He said she had effected "meaningful change”. What the hell did he mean by that? 3 Million unemployed, defeating the miners? Can anyone list any meaningful change that happened for the good during her premiership cos I'm struggling. As usual, Starmer didn't go into details so I'm none the wiser. 

It was meaningful change, for better or worse depending on your point of view.

We're all Thatcher's children now.

 

mw127964.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

It was meaningful change, for better or worse depending on your point of view.

We're all Thatcher's children now.

 

mw127964.jpg

Thats all he said as well, you’d think he’d done something truly heinous with the way some have been going on today. Clearly people haven’t actually read the article and are just using it as an excuse to moan again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ozanne said:

Thats all he said as well, you’d think he’d done something truly heinous with the way some have been going on today. Clearly people haven’t actually read the article and are just using it as an excuse to moan again. 

So what was in the article that hasn't been mentioned? You appear to have Starmer's ear and are the font of all knowledge (as long as it's Twitter/X based, of course). What have I missed please as it seems to me that Starmer highly rates a previous Tory PM, a war criminal and a Labour prime minister from 1951.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...