Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

Why do we even need two SAGE’s? 

There is an officlal one advising the government, but that was seen as opaque back in the spring...and then there is this independent one set up as the thinking was the government was taking the wrong course and they wanted to have a more open debate about what was going on.

https://www.independentsage.org/independent-sage/

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, steviewevie said:

CAlling it fake  just nullifies anything they say...because you don't like the sound of it. Actually look who they are in that group, they are not fake. Also,  Devi Sridhar is not in independent sage. Do you not like what Whitty or Vallance say either, you just keep believing all the FAKE news in telegraph and mail.

I didn't even disagree with her! She ie being vague.

They are Fake SAGE because they aren't real SAGE. But using the SAGE name to confuse people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, zahidf said:

No they are putting out hospital admission numbers by age range 

I don't think that's the case, certainly not the daily or weekly admission figures anyway. I'm on the england.nhs website and it doesn't show a breakdown of age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, zahidf said:

I didn't even disagree with her! She ie being vague.

They are Fake SAGE because they aren't real SAGE. But using the SAGE name to confuse people.

but then you said she is fake sage. She isn't in independent sage, so you had that wrong.

Then you use fake sage for any scientist from that group saying anything useful, like Prof Christina Pagel, who really needs to be listened to, and not just belittled and ignored.

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest I reckon SAGE, independent SAGE, SPI-M, NERVTAG, the JCVI and SPI-B (and others?) should all be merged into a single scientific advisory body that reports into the government. Having a bunch of different groups of science hacks is unnecessarily bureaucratic and only stands to allow people like Neil Ferguson to carry on drawing a government salary even after the public are led to believe he resigned. Why not just have a single committee chaired by Whitty and Vallance? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I don't think that's the case, certainly not the daily or weekly admission figures anyway. I'm on the england.nhs website and it doesn't show a breakdown of age.

ONS are doing it i believe. Ill try to find it

 

 

Edited by zahidf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Copperface said:

It's called a 'Total Withdrawal of All Treatment' notice and they should have to wear a badge with the acronym of this so people know what to do when they are admitted or need any care.

I wonder what proportion of beds in icus are taken by pandemic deniers !! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, zahidf said:

ONS are doing it i believe. 

 

 

ONE figures are at least a week behind so if they do breakdown ages any possible increase in child admissions won't be seen in those figures that we can see. An MP would have more up to date stats in that regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

ONE figures are at least a week behind so if they do breakdown ages any possible increase in child admissions won't be seen in those figures that we can see. An MP would have more up to date stats in that regards.

Well.. no hes quoting a radio 5 phone in. 

It could be true but its a very scary thing to be putting out there, so we probably need more evidence for it. I'm amazed he's signal boosting something like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

 

Screenshot_20210101-214504~2.png

Yeah like I thought, this figures are fairly aged now so publicly available data wouldn't show any rise in children admissions yet. Therefore feedback from people in hospitals is best the public are going to get for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

ONS seems to have found some youngsters who are less likely to have the vaccine than older.people... 

Figure 1_ 78% of adults said they would be very or fairly likely to have the COVID-19 vaccine if offered.png

Fair enough but if we are going up to the green bar, its pretty much of a muchness in real terms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Yeah like I thought, this figures are fairly aged now so publicly available data wouldn't show any rise in children admissions yet. Therefore feedback from people in hospitals is best the public are going to get for now.

Except the new variant dates back till October time according to the scientists - there will undoubtedly be children in hospital with Covid. The real worry would be if the percentage of children testing positive are ending up in hospital. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Yeah like I thought, this figures are fairly aged now so publicly available data wouldn't show any rise in children admissions yet. Therefore feedback from people in hospitals is best the public are going to get for now.

I dont know. That person only knows whats happening on their one ward. It could be there's loads of children suddenly on the wards in  couple of weeks but I'd rather have hard evidence of that rather than on a phone in 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MrBarry465 said:

It is good to see how positive Britains are on the vaccine and then you see the figures in France and the US. They will take much longer to escape it.

And I think this will only grow the more that take it as people become more confident with others having had it ... in 6 months time it won’t be such a new thing anymore 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...