Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

I think there are a few things to bear in mind when trying to compare different countries responses. 

1. They all report their numbers differently for infections and deaths etc...

2. Not all countries were starting for the same point, many of the countries that have seemingly been more successful have had scares in the past that have seen them more prepared for this type of virus. 

Sure the government have been slow to react on occasions but they are learning on their feet as the worry previously had been for a flu like virus not one like this. 

Many European countries have struggle with this virus, even the ones that have supposedly done it well are struggling. Look at Germany for example. 

We have done some stuff really well and of course it's had its issues but it is working, and working well by and large. Track and trace (not just the app) is improved now more of it is flowing down to the local level. 

Granted the tiers aren't the most straight forward but it's not hard to go to gov.uk and read them people just can't be bothered. 

Which brings me on to schools. The attitude seems to have become well as long as schools are open the rest of the rules are a waste of time - that is simply just not the case. The argument about keeping gyms open is about people's physical and mental well being which I understand but why is that any more important than a child's physical well being, mental well being and ability to learn? These kids are the Van Tams and Oxford teams of the future. Sure some cases get spread around the schools but these kids are going to be fine if they get it and more thank likely so will their parents - but what about granny? Well they shouldn't be seeing her anyway. 

Sure the government have got some things wrong but everything they get wrong is amplified by societies selfishness and inability to follow the rules. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

yep but the shorter and harder those lockdowns the more effective they are .... look at our case numbers in comparison to europe now .... they introduced curfews  I think it was a little before our pre Christmas lockdown which are a harsher restriction .... I know where I would rather be right now 

Exactly. If our government has acted when SAGE advised, had acted faster (in both waves) and harder in November then things would be much better when we went into the Christmas relaxation. As a result the numbers were too high as we are seeing now which is even before Christmas gets taken into account in the data.

The government have made mistake after mistake and refuse to learn. Everything we are seeing now is on them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fuzzy Afro said:

Don’t you just love seeing the public gaslit by intensive care professors? 

Are you going to explain why you downvoted an NHS worker yesterday?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

What do you think gaslighting is?

Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulationin which a person or a group covertly sows seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or group, making them question their own memory, perception, or judgment.”

 

 

This guy is trying to make the public feel like the ongoing disaster in Southern hospitals is their own fault. 

Edited by Fuzzy Afro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

Because he was spreading propaganda about a bunch of people being reinfected. There are only a handful of confirmed second covid infections worldwide. 

No he wasn’t, go back and read the post. At the very least show some respect for the incredibly hard work that he is carrying out at the moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

And why you can’t compare the response on China to anywhere else:

“Wuhan and its roughly 11 million residents were abruptly locked down on 23 January after weeks of being told that the virus was controllable, preventable and not contagious”

Their lockdown was significantly stricter than here or anywhere else because it had to be. Sadly, whatever people think it’s not about directly saving lives but protecting health services. The fact that they had to build huge mega hospitals shows that before they even had a lockdown the situation was out of control and their health service would’ve been completely overrun.

 

Edited by Deaf Nobby Burton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Lycra said:

It's not just the over 75s.  We're getting lots of admissions 40 - 65.

 

1 minute ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

I am referring to a post that he made several days ago. 

This is the post I am talking about from yesterday, I did say yesterday in my initial post not ‘several days ago’. There is no propaganda here so why did you downvote this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

The morale of this is that you go hard and early to stamp down on the spread of the virus. You take the tough decisions early for longer term gains, the UK was afraid to do this and we are seeing the effects of that now. 

Problem with this is the same reason it actually would have been worse under Labour - the country is pro "freedom" so any attempts to lock down before there is overwhelming evidence that you definitely need to is going into the realms of authoritarian. For the Tories and their supporters, who make up the majority of this country, there needs to be numbers to support it 

If it'd been Labour trying to lock down in anticipation of something happening then compliance would've been too low and it could've been seen by many as the communists enacting the plan of control that they wanted to do anyway. This country was always a lost cause for stopping this virus because of the public. 

36 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

No one said that though.

We can learn lessons from parts of how they handle the pandemic. As I’ve said that doesn’t mean we are advocating armed guards at houses or whatever but there certainly are measures other countries can look at and learn from. We can all learn from others.

The stupidity and selfishness of many of the people in this country is why we are where we are. The majority don't believe in government control or being told what to do in any way, so no government could've stopped this without hugely authoritarian measures. The deaths and cases was inevitable here - lockdown too early and nobody complies and lock down hard too often and you'd probably end up with civil unrest and less restrictions overall. And those are the only options - we won't even accept proper quarantine of travellers so I dont know what chance we have in every day life 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

 

This is the post I am talking about from yesterday, I did say yesterday in my initial post not ‘several days ago’. There is no propaganda here so why did you downvote this?

I’ve downvoted all of his posts since I saw the one that looked like a blatant lie last week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, efcfanwirral said:

 

Problem with this is the same reason it actually would have been worse under Labour - the country is pro "freedom" so any attempts to lock down before there is overwhelming evidence that you definitely need to is going into the realms of authoritarian. For the Tories and their supporters, who make up the majority of this country, there needs to be numbers to support it 

If it'd been Labour trying to lock down in anticipation of something happening then compliance would've been too low and it could've been seen by many as the communists enacting the plan of control that they wanted to do anyway. This country was always a lost cause for stopping this virus because of the public. 

The stupidity and selfishness of many of the people in this country is why we are where we are. The majority don't believe in government control or being told what to do in any way, so no government could've stopped this without hugely authoritarian measures. The deaths and cases was inevitable here - lockdown too early and nobody complies and lock down hard too often and you'd probably end up with civil unrest and less restrictions overall. And those are the only options - we won't even accept proper quarantine of travellers so I dont know what chance we have in every day life 

Lockdown fatigue/behavioural issues was discredited a few months into the pandemic, I can find the article if you like. We don’t know if things would’ve been worse under Labour and it’s a hypothetical so all we can go on is how it has gone under this government.

If we had lockdown earlier and had measures in place earlier we could’ve got on top of this and come out of it in a better position enabling us to prepare for this winter better. But we had a government telling us to get back to work, to eat out and go back out shopping when parts of the country weren’t ready for that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

I’ve downvoted all of his posts since I saw the one that looked like a blatant lie last week. 

So you’ve got no real reason you downvoted an NHS worker, you’re just being a jerk. Good one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...