Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2020


jj200

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ReljaGajić said:

Coldplay won't tour they announced that, 

Also Strand Festival announced new names, and Strand is Sziget's festival and it's happening after Sziget (18-22 August) so idk when Sziget will announce something, but i'm hoping soon ??, and my guesses are Billie Eilish, The Weeknd, Tame Impala, Khalid, Rhcp, Bmth

With the exception of RHCP I wouldn't have said that any of them are big enough to headline. That said, I appreciate that others think otherwise. Although there is genuinely no way Khalid and BMTH are big enough to headline a festival of Sziget's size imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, swelsbyuk said:

With the exception of RHCP I wouldn't have said that any of them are big enough to headline. That said, I appreciate that others think otherwise. Although there is genuinely no way Khalid and BMTH are big enough to headline a festival of Sziget's size imho.

Billie eilish and Tampa impala are headliners now, if they play they will headline. It's the advantage of having a long festival, headliners who wouldnt necessarily be headliners at other places. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thetime said:

Billie eilish and Tampa impala are headliners now, if they play they will headline. It's the advantage of having a long festival, headliners who wouldnt necessarily be headliners at other places. 

Pretty sure that the Weeknd can also be considered a headliner by now !

Edited by polnico
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get me wrong, I fully agree that Billie Eilish, Tame Impala and The Weeknd are at that level. The point I'm making is that to me they are not a headline size or quality, but fully understand that I am in the minority and accept that.

In addition, compared to this year, that set of headliners would be a significant step backwards imho. Not enough established artists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, swelsbyuk said:

Don't get me wrong, I fully agree that Billie Eilish, Tame Impala and The Weeknd are at that level. The point I'm making is that to me they are not a headline size or quality, but fully understand that I am in the minority and accept that.

In addition, compared to this year, that set of headliners would be a significant step backwards imho. Not enough established artists.

Totally agree that they are big names but they do not anything for me and I am not sure they are huge festival names for Budapest.

Also

Taylor Swift?Justin Timberlake?Coldplay?Pearl Jam?L LadyGaga

They are not touring in Europe in August or I don't think they will play,  trsmt and a Bennicasim announced a few acts that were at Budapest last year so we may get some. Fingers crossed for names soon

Made this prediction 4 months ago -Foals are touring so I can see them coming, Dave or AJ, Lewis, one Gallagher, Keane/Faithless/ or Kaisers. Harry would fit the bill in the same way that Sean did a few years ago. A few of these bands are touring next year or have a new album-Pet Shop Boys/ Elbow/ Foals/Kasabian/Billy/Thom Yorke. A few female acts but I would love to see Lorde, but I could also see one from Sia/Ellie/Grande.  As for the headliner I can see them going for some off these KOL/Coldplay/ RHCP, Ellish/Robbie/ Lambert&Queen/Rap act.

Edited by Davidoff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetime said:

Stone wall headliner.

Also can not see Stormzy missing the festival scene with those dates. Perhaps that's 2 of the headliners? 

Pretty sure from comments made on here previously that Stormzy isn't viewed as a headliner outside of the UK. Be interesting to know the capacity of the venues he is playing on the euro leg of that tour.

Maybe he could sub Liam?

Edited by billybigballs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, billybigballs said:

Pretty sure from comments made on here previously that Stormzy isn't viewed as a headliner outside of the UK. Be interesting to know the capacity of the venues he is playing on the euro leg of that tour.

Maybe he could sub Liam?

Some of the venues like Belgium are small, then Copenhagen is 16k capacity.

I would presume if he played, its aimed at the UK audience and that's why he could headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, billybigballs said:

Pretty sure from comments made on here previously that Stormzy isn't viewed as a headliner outside of the UK. Be interesting to know the capacity of the venues he is playing on the euro leg of that tour.

Maybe he could sub Liam?

In 2018 both of them were at Sziget, Stormzy wasn't even a sub-headliner(1st day, 16:00 Clean Bandit, 17:45 Stormzy, 19:30 Likke Li, 21:30 Kendrick Lamar), but Liam was (5th day, 16:00 Halott Penz, 17:45 Kaleo, 19:30 Liam Gallagher, 21:30 Dua Lipa), so i don't think they will headline if they're coming to Sziget, i think they're not big enough, or i'm just not that interested in their music ??‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, billybigballs said:

Pretty sure from comments made on here previously that Stormzy isn't viewed as a headliner outside of the UK. Be interesting to know the capacity of the venues he is playing on the euro leg of that tour.

Maybe he could sub Liam?

Prague's venue is a club with 800 capacity. For sure this will get upgraded almost instantly but I guess it gives you a sense for Stomzy's size/popularity in Central Europe ?

That said I wouldn't rule him out, defo sub at least if he plays

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's Sunday and was bored so just did the totting up of main stage acts over past couple of years apropos of nothing in particular.

In both years there were 28 acts (4 acts x 7 days).

In 2018 these acts came from : UK = 12; Europe = 11; USA = 5.

In 2019 these acts came from : UK = 14; Europe = 7; USA = 7.

Average : UK = 13; Europe = 9; USA = 6.

There you go. Exciting, hey? ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...