Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Do the Areas share line ups before they are published to avoid clashes?


astrowerks

Recommended Posts

I know that serious consideration is given to crowd control, hence why the secret park set (which many to believe is potential future headliners foals) is directly against liam gallagher on the pyramid which is bound to be huge. You often find the biggest acts up against each other to avoid dangerous crowds. As with the smaller stuff like the common and others (although i guess arcadia is not small) im not sure tbh sorry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, e_p said:

ie Arcadia shows say the Common before they are confirmed?  

or are all the set times done in a vacuum?

probably, but not everyone likes what you like. Just because your choices clash doesn't mean mine do :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the number of clashes I have this year and the fact that some very similar artists are up against each other I'm going to say clearly not!

I imagine they may share when they have a big act and maybe ask stages to put some of their good stuff up against them to split the crowd but for the most part I'd say they probably work in isolation. You may get some minor tweaks in times now as a result but it's such a mammoth operation I can't see every stage going around to all the others to tell them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr.Tease said:

That Radiohead/Flaming Lips clash of 2017 shows that either they don't or that they do and are evil

Yes and there are similar clashes this year. 

Lizzo vs Janet Jackson

Janelle Monae vs Christine & The Queens

Idles vs Dream Wife 

A lot of acts with similar fan bases on at the same time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, maelzoid said:

I don't really buy the crowd control thing - the legend spot particularly suffers from overcrowding because it is rarely up against anything to match its stature. It's going to be carnage for Kylie, I expect.

I have at least a 2 way clash at the time that doesn't involve Kylie. This Is The Kit vs Fat White Family. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

the answer is: not really. The stages are sort-of in competition with each other, try to book the best line-up they can, and want to attract suitably sized crowds for their acts because the acts are good.

But if (say) Prince was headlining the Pyramid, I'm not sure West Holts would spunk its budget on its best-est headliner ever to be on at the same time. It couldn't compete.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, gigpusher said:

I have at least a 2 way clash at the time that doesn't involve Kylie. This Is The Kit vs Fat White Family. 

I like Fat White Family's singles/albums, but they do look a bit wasted/shit in the videos of their live performances- I also have a clash involving them, and after seeing some of those videos am minded to maybe not see them- can anyone who's actually been to a gig of there's give any more insight?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible me being naïve to the scale of organising Glastonbury but I had never thought of it being like that with stages responsible for booking their own line ups. Does anyone know more about how this works? Does Glastonbury festival have a pot of money and then each stage have a team, which gets allocated a budget then let loose to book acts? Interested to know if anyone knows more about this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
5 minutes ago, Billjames7 said:

Possible me being naïve to the scale of organising Glastonbury but I had never thought of it being like that with stages responsible for booking their own line ups. Does anyone know more about how this works? Does Glastonbury festival have a pot of money and then each stage have a team, which gets allocated a budget then let loose to book acts? Interested to know if anyone knows more about this

yep, it's pretty much like that - lots of little empires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

I like Fat White Family's singles/albums, but they do look a bit wasted/shit in the videos of their live performances- I also have a clash involving them, and after seeing some of those videos am minded to maybe not see them- can anyone who's actually been to a gig of there's give any more insight?

I believe they have cleaned up their act. I think they are all hard drug addicts https://www.theguardian.com/music/2019/may/09/fat-white-family-every-one-of-us-had-a-hard-drug-or-drink-problem but they seem to be doing better. A friend went to see them recently and said they were fantastic. Obviously with addiction it could be hit or miss but seems like when they hit they are a treat to see live. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

I like Fat White Family's singles/albums, but they do look a bit wasted/shit in the videos of their live performances- I also have a clash involving them, and after seeing some of those videos am minded to maybe not see them- can anyone who's actually been to a gig of there's give any more insight?

They were completely trollied at the last Glasto.  The singer got his cock out on stage and started waving it around. 

Just seen them at APE last week and they were good.  No such shananigans. 

Edited by HotChipWillBreakYourLegs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, HotChipWillBreakYourLegs said:

They were completely trollied at the last Glasto.  The singer got his cock out on stage and started waving it around. 

Just seen them at APE last week and they were good.  No such shananigans. 

Thanks!- not so much bothered about him getting his nether regions out as long as they sound good (the band not his nether regions)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, gigpusher said:

I believe they have cleaned up their act. I think they are all hard drug addicts https://www.theguardian.com/music/2019/may/09/fat-white-family-every-one-of-us-had-a-hard-drug-or-drink-problem but they seem to be doing better. A friend went to see them recently and said they were fantastic. Obviously with addiction it could be hit or miss but seems like when they hit they are a treat to see live. 

You have just made my decision more difficult!;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gigpusher said:

Sorry although welcome to my world for pretty much every hour of the day for the entire festival!!

I always find it funny when you spend the weeks leading up to the festival agonising over a clash, then on the day itself end up seeing neither!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr.Tease said:

Thanks!- not so much bothered about him getting his nether regions out as long as they sound good (the band not his nether regions)

Listen, if his nether regions can hold down a tune then im all for it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...