Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

NOS Alive 2019


AlexTurnah

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, StupidDream said:

If you'd consider this a serious option, I'd say only Noel Gallagher seems likely. Liam could only do the 12th and than has four gigs in four different countries. Noel only has Mad Cool on the 11th. 

Actually, Noel playing main stage on the 12th would make perfect sense. But again: why the hell wait so long? (Very though (last-minute) negotiations?)

Idk, but 12th seems a bit short for a normal festival day, there should be one addition for the Nos Stage and at this moment Gallagher brothers seem like a plausible option.

After that they should announce at least 4 acts for the Sagres Stage because Friday and Saturday seem very short on those and they can close the lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, DarthSaul said:

Noel Gallagher would be such an uninspiring booking. He churns out dad rock whilst relying on decades old tunes to play high slots at festivals. (I've seen him twice at fests and it's always a quiet affair until the occasional oasis song)

I saw him in Aberdeen last year. Totally bored shitless watching him. Hfb stuff is repetitive and he arsed up the oasis tunes. Utterly dire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, festivalguy97 said:

Idk, but 12th seems a bit short for a normal festival day, there should be one addition for the Nos Stage and at this moment Gallagher brothers seem like a plausible option.

After that they should announce at least 4 acts for the Sagres Stage because Friday and Saturday seem very short on those and they can close the lineup.

Has Iggy Pop been ruled out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noel G is at least the better of the two! But for sure, even an old man as I am, that does nothing for me. If he was on late and I was already drunk, I would sing a long and reminisce and that is probably enough alongside some of the other acts. 

If you are still bothered by Friday line up listen to Adrenalin Baby (Johnny Marr live album). He is going to kill it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Red Day said:

I saw him in Aberdeen last year. Totally bored shitless watching him. Hfb stuff is repetitive and he arsed up the oasis tunes. Utterly dire

Saw him at Electric Fields and he was fantastic. Good thing is with his sets is that you can miss the first 25 minutes or so if you don't want the solo stuff as he tends to play it at the start of his gigs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, festivalguy97 said:

Friday still is the weakest day I could remember at Nos Alive, Primal Sceam, Vampire Weekend and Johnny Marr the only intersting acts, that´s like 4 hours of shows if they don´t clash Johnny with one of them 

It will be likely to happen, and that is a shame. I would much prefer Izal or Gossip on Sagres and Johnny Marr on NOS. The Smiths are one of my favorite bands but Vampire Weekend new album has been on repeat on my Spotify. If they clash their shows, I will always feel like missing something. And I hate that. Also want to watch Primal Scream, but would surely prefer Johnny over them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, festivalguy97 said:

Friday still is the weakest day I could remember at Nos Alive, Primal Sceam, Vampire Weekend and Johnny Marr the only intersting acts, that´s like 4 hours of shows if they don´t clash Johnny with one of them

Not exactly massive names but Gossip, Cut copy and Tash Sultana are worth catching for sure. Friday is still weak for NOS but it still has plenty to offer with the addition of Johnny. Add one more name to that main stage and you have a day that stands up against any other euro festival this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Homer said:

I think we may just have to face up to the fact that the line-up is pretty damn good for the money, and we're one headliner away from having nothing left to complain about.

Absolutely! 

I have a lot of new music from this lineup already and some of these bands are mega. This could be the last time the Cure tour! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Yatesbomb said:

Absolutely! 

I have a lot of new music from this lineup already and some of these bands are mega. This could be the last time the Cure tour! 

I'm going to Glasto as well - reckon I'll watch them twice (and The Chems)!

The Nos website is looking good now - has had a big update.

Edited by Homer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...