Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Gorillaz


gmb1992

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Wonder how many people were deflated for it being 10 songs and out. 

 

Honestly, I came away from the show pretty disappointed - though others may well have had a great time. I don't have any desire to listen to this new album, aside from a re-listen to the IDLES track.

 

I was also very disappointed that they didn't round off with an encore of a few hits. People just paid £100 a ticket to watch them perform 12 songs they'd never heard before. If I was in the band's position, I'd have just rounded the night off with a 3 song encore of tracks from post-Plastic Beach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 31/08/2025 at 21:54, NorthernSoul52 said:

There's been a handful of genuinely terrific singles from them in recent years, but would argue it's been a while since they've had an album that felt harmonious. 

I thought Cracker Island and Song Machine (vol1) were both really solid albums.  I doubt we'll ever get something quite as cohesive as Demon Days or Plastic Beach again, but the last two are both really good records, with barely any filler.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, K2SO said:

 

Honestly, I came away from the show pretty disappointed - though others may well have had a great time. I don't have any desire to listen to this new album, aside from a re-listen to the IDLES track.

 

I was also very disappointed that they didn't round off with an encore of a few hits. People just paid £100 a ticket to watch them perform 12 songs they'd never heard before. If I was in the band's position, I'd have just rounded the night off with a 3 song encore of tracks from post-Plastic Beach

Yeah, that's a £50 show kind of setlist.  For 100 notes you expect to be properly entertained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A show of all new material is challenging.  Surprised they didn't play a few known songs as an encore.  That's tough on the audience.  As mentioned didn't even need to be Clint Eastwood - Feel Good Inc - On Melancholy Hill.  Could have been a few latter period "hits".

 

Plastic Beach concert was great.  Almost every song greeted with a loud cheer.  UK top 40 hit in 2010 lolz Doncamatic has been erased from all existence 🙂

 

The big GORILLAZ letters were back though this time on a screen.

 

They didn't use the 2010 tour "idents" of the band locked in the dressing room, which was odd given the obvious attention to detail/call backs/easter eggs elsewhere.

 

Damon hardly said a word.  The chat online was that he hardly spoke at the s/t gig but he seems to have spoken loads in comparison.  These retrospectives appear to have been emotional and confusing for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Yeah, that's a £50 show kind of setlist.  For 100 notes you expect to be properly entertained.

I disagree. What we got for the 100 notes (actually 90) was a show by a notable band with an iconic frontperson supported by several professional musicians forming the choir and orchestra and a conveyer belt of famous cameos. Add to that the complex production and visuals. This was a cast of dozens and more behind the scenes. 
 

I would agree with you if we were talking about a standard 3 or 4 member plug and play type band turning up and playing an entirely new album for full price. But this is more like a show you might see at the Albert Hall or an opera house. 
 

I was at Blur’s Darren show at the Apollo, despite advertising it as that there were idiots in there moaning there were no classics and shouting “woo hoo” throughout. I heard no such dissent last night. Everyone around where I was seemed to be appreciating it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like it's:

 

21/03: Co-op Live, Manchester
22/03: bp pulse, Birmingham
24/03: OVO Hydro, Glasgow
25/03: First Direct Bank Arena, Leeds
27/03: Utilita Arena, Cardiff
28/03: Motorpoint Arena, Nottingham
29/03: M&S Bank Arena, Liverpool
31/03: SSE Arena, Belfast
01/04: 3Arena, Dublin
29/06: Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, London

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Looks like it's:

 

21/03: Co-op Live, Manchester
22/03: bp pulse, Birmingham
24/03: OVO Hydro, Glasgow
25/03: First Direct Bank Arena, Leeds
27/03: Utilita Arena, Cardiff
28/03: Motorpoint Arena, Nottingham
29/03: M&S Bank Arena, Liverpool
31/03: SSE Arena, Belfast
01/04: 3Arena, Dublin
29/06: Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, London

Any news on on sale dates? i cant see anything online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...