Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

They're insane in the smaller venues, brilliant live act up close. I've never seen them outdoors but the footage always feels like somethings missing.

Can only speak for Latitude, but it brought a tear to my eye how well they stepped up to headline. I don't even particularly like the new album, but I loved the whole show. Only trouble was that it was wasted on the children in the crowd, every other time I've seen them play it was crowdsurfing central, I tried it then and got abruptly dropped after about a yard. I suppose they just don't teach it at private school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way Foals will be anywhere near to headlining for a few years.. I was surprised at them headlining Bestival even. And it's not even like they have an amazing live show to compensate for lack of size; I saw them at Reading and left after about half an hour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is someone suggesting Keane as a headliner any more ludicrous than people suggesting Florence and the Machine?

Nah Florence could sub now without question, Keane couldn't. I reckon she'll only headline if someone drops out but I think she'd do a good job if that happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish they were still playing Mathletics and Hummer! It was really weird last year watching the weird little indie band that made an album as offbeat as Antidotes headline Latitude, I just don't think I can reconcile those early memories with a band that will one day headline Glastonbury.

They've brought hummer back a few times, played it at ally pally this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No idea if this has been mentioned already, but does anyone think that take that are a possibility, if not next year, in future years? They seem like the kind of slightly curveball band that they might surprise people with and are unquestionably big enough to headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No idea if this has been mentioned already, but does anyone think that take that are a possibility, if not next year, in future years? They seem like the kind of slightly curveball band that they might surprise people with and are unquestionably big enough to headline.

If Beyonce can headline, I see no reason why Take That couldn't potentially headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're insane in the smaller venues, brilliant live act up close. I've never seen them outdoors but the footage always feels like somethings missing.

I saw them at a Festival in Belgium and didn't really get it. Was really excited for them as everyone on here seems to rave about them, but didn't really work for me. I'd like to see them given a big slot though, to see if they can step up.

As for headliners, gotta be Fleetwood Mac I would have thought. Then anyone really, give Fairport Convention one night and Blue Man Group the other, shake it up a bit.

But more likely The Mac, Radiohead and the indie darlings of the year.

But I'd still like a change, test a few people's commitment (BBC included)

Then Iron Maiden the year after. Invite Bruce next year, he realises he's been an idiot, offers to play for free, makes a press statement to that effect and Mr Eavis books him on the spot.

Edited by TheNewUnion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for headliners, gotta be Fleetwood Mac I would have thought. Then anyone really, give Fairport Convention one night and Blue Man Group the other, shake it up a bit.

Fairport Convention and Blue Man Group..? Why would they give smaller, niche acoustic acts the headline pyramid slot when they can play the Acoustic stage or Avalon to a more appreciative audience in a more intimate and suited enviroment.

Never going to happen...Never going to happen

Edited by danbailey80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fairport Convention and Blue Man Group..? Why would they give smaller, niche acoustic acts the headline pyramid slot when they can play the Acoustic stage or Avalon to a more appreciative audience in a more intimate and suited enviroment.

Never going to happen...Never going to happen

I know it's never going to happen, but it'd be great to see something different, how long ago did Archaos play? 20 years or more, would be great to see something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose it’s been long enough since Radiohead headlined that they could do it without a new album, but I reckon them in 2016 is more likely.

has there been a Glastonbury headline ever / in recent years who's headlined whilst not promoting a new album?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Metallica?

HA what a fool i am (and thinking back, there have been quite a few)

that said, Radiohead definitely aren't a band to want to headline with a greatest hits type set. whenever they do finally headline again, it'll be a set chock full of whatever new material they're promoting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, and right now I can’t see it being ready for next year’s Glastonbury. I’d love an In Rainbows heavy set, though.

Edit: They could well have an album out/ready by then, actually. I somehow forgot it’s still a whole year away. Carry on.

Edited by bocumaroy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah 2016 definitely seems more likely as it doesn't seem like they're very far in to the new album (although Radiohead did spring their last two albums on an unsuspecting public so who knows how hard at work they've actually been on this new one)

and yeah i agree that the In Rainbows material will be fantastic when it finally gets aired on the Pyramid. let's hope they're still fond of it by then and we get a lot of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HA what a fool i am (and thinking back, there have been quite a few)

that said, Radiohead definitely aren't a band to want to headline with a greatest hits type set. whenever they do finally headline again, it'll be a set chock full of whatever new material they're promoting

I'm not so sure. They did a greatest hits set at Reading on the In Rainbows tour. They know they have to tailor things to the crowd.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...