Jump to content

The Dirty Independence Question


Kyelo
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Time to lock this thread.  Its over :😜 

i see trump has been ranting how scotland will be better off without sturgeon, trump will be, perhaps he'll get his mate the sex offender back in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

independence day has been delayed for 5 years.

And I like Murray, and to say he was a loser is kind of dumb but there's so much dumb shit said on here what you going to do.

And I'm remainer mcremain and there's all this bregret about, but there's shit going on everywhere, and the economy will recover a bit...and if scotland left the UK I'm sure in the long run they'd be ok.

Meanwhile...just go for devo max.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2023 at 3:36 PM, pink_triangle said:

If you can see how Sturgeon got tied up in knots over the trans issue, imagine what would happen to Forbes. I wouldn’t think she can fob off issues related to abortion, gay marriage and trans issues in a leadership contest. I think it will end up being Swinney

Well that prediction went as well as my usual ones. Knowing how bad my predictions are can I say it definitely won’t be Forbes, the SNP definitely won’t pick someone who can’t say it’s great that 2 men can marry each other, or can get completely behind a woman’s right to choose!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, steviewevie said:

independence day has been delayed for 5 years.

And I like Murray, and to say he was a loser is kind of dumb but there's so much dumb shit said on here what you going to do.

And I'm remainer mcremain and there's all this bregret about, but there's shit going on everywhere, and the economy will recover a bit...and if scotland left the UK I'm sure in the long run they'd be ok.

Meanwhile...just go for devo max.

They'd be ok, but adjusting to self financing would-be hard with huge cuts in public services 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, LJS said:

¹

You are wrong about me. I suspect you may well be correct about the Scottish electorate.

I was speaking about the Scottish electorate who show little sign of supporting indie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, pink_triangle said:

Didn’t Scotland vote for that though in the independence vote?

 

38 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Yup 

Aye, democracy stopped in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Once in a generation 

"BORIS JOHNSON has today urged Sunday Express readers to back the Conservative Party in a “critical once in a generation election” on Thursday."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1214450/boris-johnson-letter-general-election-2019-tory-party-labour-jeremy-corbyn-latest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ach, there's me thought you understood the distinction between an opinion and a commitment, Barry. I guess I was over estimating your intellectual ability.

And even if Eck had said "I solemnly promise there will be no further referendums for a Billion years" - he has absolutely no right to commit future governments to any such promise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LJS said:

Ach, there's me thought you understood the distinction between an opinion and a commitment, Barry. I guess I was over estimating your intellectual ability.

And even if Eck had said "I solemnly promise there will be no further referendums for a Billion years" - he has absolutely no right to commit future governments to any such promise. 

I think the vast majority of folk recognise that line as the standard attempt to get your vote out that it was. 

That’s before we even consider the significance of the Brexit vote which again, most sensible punters see as a significant change in the political landscape.
Certainly more relevant than …..ah but Alex Salmond said…others will disagree 🤷‍♂️

Edited by Comfy Bean
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

I remember you saying at the time you would accept the outcome 🙂 

I did accept the outcome.

14 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Would you have welcomed multiple referendum on rejoining the UK if you had won ? 🙂 

In an independent Scotland, if the punters elect a party to government with that in their manifesto, I would accept a referendum to rejoin the UK. I would only accept multiple referendums without a reasonable gap if there has been a significant change in circumstances as happened when Scotland was dragged kicking and screaming out of the EU.

image.png.55b66783a605ce3c448a468ef5369da2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LJS said:

I did accept the outcome.

In an independent Scotland, if the punters elect a party to government with that in their manifesto, I would accept a referendum to rejoin the UK. I would only accept multiple referendums without a reasonable gap if there has been a significant change in circumstances as happened when Scotland was dragged kicking and screaming out of the EU.

image.png.55b66783a605ce3c448a468ef5369da2.png

Who determines a significant change in circumstances? That sounds quite vague. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

Who determines a significant change in circumstances? That sounds quite vague. 

It can’t be vague PT when a specific example is given within the post you quote 🤷‍♂️

I do not believe for a second that you personally don’t see exiting the eu as a significant change in circs 🤞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Comfy Bean said:

It can’t be vague PT when a specific example is given within the post you quote 🤷‍♂️

I do not believe for a second that you personally don’t see exiting the eu as a significant change in circs 🤞

I took it as being in a post Brexit world where SNP had then won a referendum. LJS said he would accept multiple referendums  (against his view) with a significant change. The big question to me then is which side decides what is a significant change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I took it as being in a post Brexit world where SNP had then won a referendum. LJS said he would accept multiple referendums  (against his view) with a significant change. The big question to me then is which side decides what is a significant change.

I think in a democracy, the idea is you persuade the voters that there has been a significant change & get them to vote for you. Ultimately if people vote for something, they should get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few thoughts on the SNP leadership candidates now Robertson has ruled himself out and imo it makes very bad reading for the SNP:

Regan- total no hoper but potential to split the party even more over GRA reform lines. never gonna win imo, only supported by weirdos like wings and salmond 

Forbes- vaguely competent by snp standards (not a high bar), but a bit on the right in terms of the fiscal side of things it seems? Also hates gays and abortions and while that’s obv not a pressing issue atm policy wise it can easily derail things. Just ask Tim Farron. Also anti GRA reform so greens would have a hissy fit (lol)

 

yousaf- indescribably incompetent and a failure in all his roles in government. Keeps falling upwards tho so who knows. 
 

All  three seem a disaster to me. Happy to hear other views 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

I think the SNP was hoping Brexit being such a mess would help them but I think its just focused the Scots on how much a UK break up would hurt us all.  It would be way more complex than Brexit and way more painful.

I don't think any SNP leader can turn this around.  

You’re correct in saying the snp thought brexit would get them to 60 odd percent for Indy in the polls. The day after the brexit ref suggests that to me. Sturgeon was all lost correct there and can see why she thought it. The literal day after the result my mum (staunch unionist but also remainer and hates the snp) was almost wavering and considered indy. It was a pretty brutal day if u voted remain.

 

Anyway, by the time the 2017 election rolled around their thinking backfired and somehow brexit wasn’t the main story of the election and no one could be fucked with Indy. Then they lost a good few seats and had to retreat. 
 

anyway my main point is - If sturgeon couldn’t get Scotland closer to Indy then there’s literally no chance humza or Forbes can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Barry Fish said:

I think the SNP was hoping Brexit being such a mess would help them but I think its just focused the Scots on how much a UK break up would hurt us all.  It would be way more complex than Brexit and way more painful.

I don't think any SNP leader can turn this around.  

the lines the snp use for brexit (the bad effect of creating borders with your biggest market)  also apply for indie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • As resident Drake fan I've got to chime in here! Also a Kendrick fan of course, it's possible to be both. The whole beef is probably one of the few exciting events in mainstream US hip hop in recent years and certainly more of an event than both of their most recent albums... Firstly, Kendrick won the beef, but at what cost? Firstly there's the personal integrity question which is probably taking a big hit. At one point you could have posited him as the moral vanguard of hip hop but he's indulged conspiracy theorism in this (effectively and with a fair slice of humour, but conspiracy nonetheless) barrage of diss tracks, not to mention that he lapped up some deliberate BS fed by Drake's team and put it in a song. Obviously Mr. Morale itself goes some way towards distancing himself from the saintly projection from fans, the media and the world at large, but in the diss tracks he is adopting a 'we the people' voice and airing out the grievances and theories of drake haters worldwide and it must be cathartic for all of them. And he's good at it, but lets not confuse what he's doing here with some of his Pulitzer work.  .  And then of course the accusation that he beat his fiancee up and hired a crisis management team to clear it up is a pretty heavy one and you know, quite a long way away from "Godspeed for women's rights". Thirdly, he didn't really attempt to answer any questions about his own affairs, which is fine for now, he had plenty of mud to sling at Drake, and a world ready to listen, but someone will come for him one day and he won't have the same ammo to respond with and I guess that might be tactical victory, strategic failure. But he can still rely on being able to outrap nearly anyone else. For Drake, obviously it's been a pretty bruising encounter, especially because Kendrick used his own playbook against him in terms of how the beef played out with back to back releases and even a catchy club tune that will get singalongs all summer. But Drake's disses were pretty solid, well constructed and well rapped with lots of points scored and if he couldn't land a decisive blow against Kendrick, he certainly made the other co-ordinated agitators (Future, MetroBoomin, The Weeknd) look pretty silly. Rick Ross is now the old man angry at clouds meme.   It's likely that both achieve extended relevance from this spat based on the streaming numbers. Drake is like Taylor Swift in that he releases music at an astonishing rate. I can't see this really making a significant dent in that cadence but hopefully it might inspire something better than his dull recent output. Kendrick hasn't done numbers like this for a while. It's a bit annoying that like 'Humble', it's his worst tracks that cut through (I'm calling 'Not like us' garbage, sorry.)   There's an element of proof in the pudding for Drake in the fact that this beef is happening at all. In terms of motivation for Kendrick starting this beef, he clearly just wanted to prove he's number 1, responding to Drake & J.Cole's track "First Person Shooter" last year. Why is Kendrick so bothered? Why does he have this visceral hatred of all things Aubrey? Why has he thrown the absolute kitchen sink at him, noting every personal grievance, every rumour and conspiracy and even bringing family into it and throwing some pretty questionable racial politics into the mix? It's not an act of benevolence to the wider world but an attempt to see off a rival and be crowned the undisputed best rapper alive. To do that he had to defeat Drake, and throw it all on the line to do so. Would and should Drake play Glastonbury? The most obvious point is he fulfils most of the objective-ish criteria that gets bandied about on here to evaluate whether an act is a suitable headliner. One of the most commercially successful artists of recent times, a number of critically acclaimed releases, sellout arena tours and number one records. Arguably he's the rap equivalent of Coldplay - a mega artist who has evolved his music over the years in accordance with the trends of the time rather than imposing his artistic vision upon the world, and generally having what would be considered a broad rather than deep appeal. Obviously a lot of people think Coldplay are shite but few argue their credentials to headline. His creative peak was the middle years of the last decade with a number of great releases from 2012 through to 2018ish. Take Care (2012) and Nothing Was The Same (2014) are classic rap albums for me, the sort that have sadly died out. Scorpion was probably the turning point where, there were more stinkers than solid ones, but a bit like Taylor Swift's most recent album, a curated playlist picking out an hours worth of material from the record would make a very decent album. He's clearly far from a terrible rapper too, although he is prone to having many songs based around a similar subject matter and hasn't demonstrated lots of artistic growth from the early years.   I'd say we're probably now entering the era where he could play. Whether he would be booked is another matter as I'd say mainstream opinion in the UK would be dead against it. But as far as the economics around it are concerned, I think he could become a festival sized act again, in the same way that Taylor Swift is probably 'above' festival sized right now.    
    • next week it is then (was holding out a glimmer of hope but alas)
    • To have 'Instant Removal' you need to leave the ECHR and likely leave the UN too. Are you willing to have both of those happen?
    • Supreme court would disagree with you (and fix your spelling).
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...