2013 Headliners

[MEGABOWL]

I don't know anyone, and suspect I never will, who would want to see The Stones and Mumfords

[giantkatestacks]

Hmm Tinie Tempah didnt connect with the audience at all at Hop Farm before Prince and didnt seem equipped to turn it around.

[Guest]

Hmm Tinie Tempah didnt connect with the audience at all at Hop Farm before Prince and didnt seem equipped to turn it around.

[giantkatestacks]

Thats true, our faces must have looked a bit meh. Still though if he had tried something different and not got all narky about it it could have worked. Maybe.

[ukmountie]

Look as much as you hate them, i've never seen someone ever come back from a mumford gig saying they didn't "give it their all" and that their "shit live".

[eoinca]

Crikey, I know 3 just from one discussion in the pub the other week

[Bisque]

Tinie Tempah drew a pretty sizeable crowd last tine but may have been due to the sun coming out!

I'd like the line up to come out purely to convince my mates who don't know "its not all about the music" to get excited to go. Not that they'll get a ticket anyway!

[Bisque]

Tinie Tempah drew a pretty sizeable crowd last tine but may have been due to the sun coming out!

I'd like the line up to come out purely to convince my mates who don't know "its not all about the music" to get excited to go. Not that they'll get a ticket anyway!

[MEGABOWL]

You need new drinking buddies.

[Bisque]

Glue isn't cool these days. Mioaw mioaw?

[eFestivals]

Out of any sub playing any festival this year. Mumford would be the strongest sub. Almost too strong, that's why i'm a little inclined to think they are headlining the sunday..

a straightforwards view would say you're very probably right.

But in the background, I know that Glastonbury approached a number of acts in January (and perhaps Feb too) to headline the Sunday and that at least some of those acts would be regarded as smaller than Mumfords.

My take on things is that Mumfords would have already been signed up before then, and so there has to be a reason why they weren't put into the Sunday slot - and the only thing which seems to make any sense is that they weren't because they are or were the back-up for the stones.

It might be that the stones confirmed to Glasto and that has allowed Mumfords to be moved to Sunday, but my guess is that the stones probably didn't confirm (if they have, of course) before Glasto had sorted another act for the Sunday.

So I'm still plumping for Mumfords before the Stones, unless I get some info that says differently. But of course that's a guess made by piecing together various bits of info, so it always stands the chance of being wrong.

[Matt42]

a straightforwards view would say you're very probably right.

But in the background, I know that Glastonbury approached a number of acts in January (and perhaps Feb too) to headline the Sunday and that at least some of those acts would be regarded as smaller than Mumfords.

My take on things is that Mumfords would have already been signed up before then, and so there has to be a reason why they weren't put into the Sunday slot - and the only thing which seems to make any sense is that they weren't because they are or were the back-up for the stones.

It might be that the stones confirmed to Glasto and that has allowed Mumfords to be moved to Sunday, but my guess is that the stones probably didn't confirm (if they have, of course) before Glasto had sorted another act for the Sunday.

So I'm still plumping for Mumfords before the Stones, unless I get some info that says differently. But of course that's a guess made by piecing together various bits of info, so it always stands the chance of being wrong.

[JBarbour]

a straightforwards view would say you're very probably right.

But in the background, I know that Glastonbury approached a number of acts in January (and perhaps Feb too) to headline the Sunday and that at least some of those acts would be regarded as smaller than Mumfords.

My take on things is that Mumfords would have already been signed up before then, and so there has to be a reason why they weren't put into the Sunday slot - and the only thing which seems to make any sense is that they weren't because they are or were the back-up for the stones.

It might be that the stones confirmed to Glasto and that has allowed Mumfords to be moved to Sunday, but my guess is that the stones probably didn't confirm (if they have, of course) before Glasto had sorted another act for the Sunday.

So I'm still plumping for Mumfords before the Stones, unless I get some info that says differently. But of course that's a guess made by piecing together various bits of info, so it always stands the chance of being wrong.

[monkey1989]

How do they announce (first time noob) is it done on the radio like r/l ? Or does the website just update

[Jackson1990]

Mumfords would put people in a bloody good mood...

Look as much as you hate them, i've never seen someone ever come back from a mumford gig saying they didn't "give it their all" and that their "shit live".

Maybe they are one of those bands who on record are pretty dull, but in a good setting like a concert, really connect with the crowd, for example... this definitely looks like a bouncy performance to me.

Don't deny, the crowd are fecking loving it!

[Badlands]

Very very logical... so in summary they might have moved mumford? but then maybe they haven't because it was too late..?

[eFestivals]

How do they announce (first time noob) is it done on the radio like r/l ? Or does the website just update

last few years it's been announced on the website and on the guardian's website, at about 10pm in the evening.

[The Nal]

Don't deny, the crowd are fecking loving it!

[MEGABOWL]

Glue isn't cool these days. Mioaw mioaw?

[MEGABOWL]

Why do you need him to summarise? For christ sake he's been saying the same thing to you for the past month practically.

[Guest]

Edited March 13, 2013 by GETOFFAMYLAWN

[russycarps]

So is this crowd.

[Ed209]

Mumfords would put people in a bloody good mood...

Look as much as you hate them, i've never seen someone ever come back from a mumford gig saying they didn't "give it their all" and that their "shit live".

Maybe they are one of those bands who on record are pretty dull, but in a good setting like a concert, really connect with the crowd, for example... this definitely looks like a bouncy performance to me.

Don't deny, the crowd are fecking loving it!

[PurpleFire]

Hang on! Check out the guy in the crowd in the mumford video at 2mins50s!! You're onto something, Nal.

[The Nal]

Hang on! Check out the guy in the crowd in the mumford video at 2mins50s!! You're onto something, Nal.

Edited March 13, 2013 by The Nal