Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2013 Headliners


Guest shangri-la_steward

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The more this stones saga goes on, the more I want Eavis to tell the stones to go fuck themselves. I was quite excited by the prospect of the stones about a year ago, but this being my first proper exposure to how they treat people, as time has gone on, the more and more I realise that they are just lowlifes who are taking glastonbury festival -- the organisers, participants, punters, beneficiaries --- for mugs.

Fuck em. A year ago I would have gone to see the stones, now I won't go anywhere near it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
This is what I don't understand. From what is being reported the Rolling Stones have apparently been offered a millon to play this years festival and this is the bands fault? It's not as if they've agreed to play and then keep raising their fee......if anyone is to blame for this it is the festival organisers.

I'm not entirely sure it's all a one way thing.

There's certainly some stuff that's going around which has said that the Stones have said that Glastonbury need to up the amount on offer for there to be a chance of the Stones playing.

I've no idea if it's true, but I strongly suspect that if Eavis "offered Β£1M last week" that it's an improved offer and not the first one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I don't understand. From what is being reported the Rolling Stones have apparently been offered a millon to play this years festival and this is the bands fault? It's not as if they've agreed to play and then keep raising their fee......if anyone is to blame for this it is the festival organisers.

All the tickets are already sold so I'm not sure why they don't just go a cheaper option.......I personally don't believe the millon pound figure anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
whats the most Glasto have paid for a headliner, ballpark? is a Million going to be pushing it, or literally blowing it out the water?

as far as I'm aware it's Β£250k, but it might have moved up a notch since they paid that.

I'd be exceedingly surprised if it's broken Β£500k before now tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be very suprised if Michael has offered Β£1Million for The Stones. That sort of amount would surely impact on the total given to WaterAid, Oxfam etc and I think people underestimate the importance Michael attaches to the charitable aspect of the festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
So they'll blow all their budget on one show?!

I don't see it as impossible that they'd throw an offer at that level at the Stones - particularly if they're still looking for that 3rd headliner.

Cos if they're still looking for that 3rd headliner it's not too likely to be one that people will think of as a headliner. If they lose the Stones too then that's repeated (but even further down the list) for another headliner, and then 'the show' in future years could be impacted by that.

It sounds to me like Glasto might have got to the position where they really do need the Stones, if for no other reason than to give them confidence into the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

It makes me laugh how people are saying "it's disgusting" and the like, but I doubt much of the thoughts that are driving that impacts into their own lives and choices (at least for some).

Yes, the stones are over-paid - but so is everyone earning more than the average wage. The differentials at every level of wage have become too extreme.

So who is voting for a pay cut for themselves along with one for the stones....?

</tumbleweed>

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes me laugh how people are saying "it's disgusting" and the like, but I doubt much of the thoughts that are driving that impacts into their own lives and choices (at least for some).

Yes, the stones are over-paid - but so is everyone earning more than the average wage. The differentials at every level of wage have become too extreme.

So who is voting for a pay cut for themselves along with one for the stones....?

</tumbleweed>

Edited by scaryclaireyfairy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...