Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Oasis


Guest

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Chef said:

Don't get me wrong, I'll be in for Oasis tickets wherever they play but it does seem a little odd they would go back to Wembley if the opportunity to do Knebworth was there. Head vs. Heart maybe. 10 nights at Wembley would see more people through the gates than 4 at Knebworth and a large range of hospitality options to boot if money spinning was the number one driver. Which it probably is. 

Agreed, they’ve done 7 nights there this tour, I can’t see why they’d focus there. Etihad and Knebworth seem much more appropriate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Chef said:

Don't get me wrong, I'll be in for Oasis tickets wherever they play but it does seem a little odd they would go back to Wembley if the opportunity to do Knebworth was there. Head vs. Heart maybe.

 

It definitely would be a head vs heart decision as the literal only reason to go to Knebworth would be that they had a couple of landmark shows there 30 years previously. By every other possible measure Wembley (or the Olympic Stadium, or Spurs, or Arsenal, or even Twickenham) would be the better choice as they've already got much of what's needed in place whereas Knebworth is a case of build everything from scratch and even then it's still a compromise in many respects. That applies both from the business perspective but also in terms of fan experience.

 

25 minutes ago, Chef said:

10 nights at Wembley would see more people through the gates than 4 at Knebworth and a large range of hospitality options to boot if money spinning was the number one driver. Which it probably is. 

 

Being realistic, these days even just 4 nights at Wembley would probably see more people through the gates than 4 at Knebworth. The licencing regarding concerts (and all of the gubbins that goes along with it like emergency procedures, traffic management plans, etc) has  been massively tightened up since the last time a 125k gig was held there (over 21 years ago now) and I think they'd struggle to get a premises licence approved for the full 125k these days. So realistically each night they'd be playing to (approximately) two thirds of what they had at those famous shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, RoosteR_ said:

Where did you get this from? I've heard the same a few weeks ago. I was quite surprised that they think about doing Wembley and Knebworth at the same time but the demand is still huge. 

 

Someone in the Oasis collectors group I am part of, posted a couple of weeks ago that he had heard from the same source that told him about the reunion last year that 10 nights at Wembley and 6 at a Manchester stadium was locked in for 2026. There was no mention of Knebworth. 

 

I have no reason to doubt him, but it is the internet after all so these things always should be taken with a pinch of salt as its probably a case of Chinese whispers. 

 

The demand is there to sell out a year of gigs at Wembley and however many nights at Knebworth. Knebworth seems to be this mythical place to most fans, you will have the same situation as when they announced the initial shows that people will come in from all over the world for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, dotdash79 said:

They don’t seem to want to go after records, Taylor Swift doing 20 nights at Wembley I can see her doing. 

Unlikely. (Not to say she couldn't, let me stress, but think unless she was going to uproot Travis for a good chunk of the year, and depending on future with kids, imagine any long residency would be closer to home.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree that if Oasis are going back to Wembley, they want the record. Another ten shows takes them past Coldplay's total of sixteen - though if we're going to get technical, this is the Live '25 Tour, which could well mean next year's leg counts for stat folks such as myself as something entirely new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The advantage Coldplay have had is that they're basically, even with a new record, stuck rigidly to the branding, shape and structure as the Music of the Spheres World Tour. Given they already plan to do a load of extra shows under its name in 2027 and 2028 - 138, if Martin is to be believed - imagine the plan is very much for it to not only dethrone Swift as the highest-attended tour (which it already has), but the highest-grossing too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to be honest i don't think oasis give a s**t about records or things like that. everyone knows they could announce 50 shows a Wembley and have them sold out in a day. they don't have anything to prove with things like that and don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, deadponyclub said:

Are we still thinking they may be 2027 Glasto headliners?

 

They may. It'd be foolish to rule it out at this point - but equally it's a long way from being a certainty.

 

There's not been any solid info to suggest they are in the frame, but then we're 21 months away from the festival and I don't think there's much solid info about any major acts. Most of the speculation is along the lines of people seeing it as a natural fit / suitable climax to the reunion.

 

Ultimately it's pretty much going to come down to whether they're still active in 2027, and whether they feel strongly enough about playing that they're prepared to accept a massively lower fee than they're getting elsewhere - both of which would be guesswork at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, snoochie1981 said:

Tickets for this weekend now starting to appear on twickets. Still difficult to beat those bots though!

I’m trying any I see pop up in the confidence that I’ll never actually be able to complete the purchase. 
 

I really can’t justify the cost of going again  but I’d have to go, if I could 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ClementsMike said:

I’m trying any I see pop up in the confidence that I’ll never actually be able to complete the purchase. 
 

I really can’t justify the cost of going again  but I’d have to go, if I could 😄

 

Exactly the same here. I absolutely cannot afford the price of a ticket, nor the travel to London, not the cost of the rest of the trip - food, drink, etc ...

 

But still - if I can beat the bots then I'm going to have to take advantage of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Managed to get two standing tickets for Sunday off a friend's family member who isn't able to go. Absolutely delighted. Had completely written off my chances after not getting a sniff at any of the first round of UK dates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Managed to get two standing tickets for Sunday off a friend's family member who isn't able to go. Absolutely delighted. Had completely written off my chances after not getting a sniff at any of the first round of UK dates.

I am resigned to being in London this weekend but not going. Even so, hearing stories like this is great, well done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...