Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2023/24


charlierc

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, charlierc said:

 

Imo a draw is all we need to really throw a cat among the pigeons. A Spurs win really tilts the balance but a 2012 re-do would also be a good'un.

 

Certainly, 2 wins for Spurs makes Champions League possible, particularly as Villa have a more difficult game on the final day, so I think they've got to go for it even in spite of the contortions some Spurs fans are finding themselves making due to what impact it might have for Arsenal.

Can't see it myself. I know Spurs have a good record against city, but when the title is on the line, I can't see anything but a fairly comfortable win for the financial cheats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DareToDibble said:

Spurs are taking points off City this evening, I'm convinced of it.

spurs fans want spurs to lose, sad f**kers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, thetime said:

Liverpool v Blackburn 1995...

 

 

I was there and the vast majority were behind the team as soon as it kicked off. There was a split second after we scored where I thought "Oh, sh*t. What have we done" but it didn't matter anyway thanks to West Ham.

 

Maybe they can spoil the Manc party again this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, charlierc said:

 

What price we get rid of VAR and near-immediately go to wanting it back?


Those of us who support teams outside the premiership are generally happy not to have it.

 

I watched Liverpool v Villa this week. Gakpo scores but it’s a really subdued celebration knowing there is a VAR check coming. It sucks the emotion out of a game and I’m glad they don’t have it at our level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Crazyfool01 said:

Think I’m a bit conflicted on scrapping it . It feels to me like referring standards have dropped along with the VAR issues . So yeah above might well be true 

big problem is the fan standards rather than the ref standards, lots of fans expect perfection from a subjective judgement , you can measure with perfection for  if the ball has crossed the line, you cannot make the same perfect measure on whether that kick was a foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neil said:

big problem is the fan standards rather than the ref standards, lots of fans expect perfection from a subjective judgement , you can measure with perfection for  if the ball has crossed the line, you cannot make the same perfect measure on whether that kick was a foul.

personally I dont expect perfection , but I guess refs will always be under more scuitiny now with more and more tv coverage , so that shows up the errors more so maybe they havent got any worse and you are correct . Has just felt that way last couple of seasons particularly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thetime said:

Rivalry? Jesus wept. 

 

Screenshot_20240515_193948_X.thumb.jpg.e3a2fb3520ae21d72762818e4cc3c137.jpg

I mean, treating it like it's still 1996 and we're smarting from that season is one way to go about. Although everyone wants to beat Manchester United tbf.

 

We were good enough to win tonight but just couldn't. Crap shooting and 3 poorly defended goals will do that for ya. f**king annoying but that's football sometimes.

17 minutes ago, thetime said:

Eeeekk united and Newcastle fighting for the conference league. 😐

Well, I suspect there'll be more final day twists and turns than the title race will provide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, charlierc said:

 

Well, I suspect there'll be more final day twists and turns than the title race will provide.

Rather no european football, than go in the conference cup. It's perhaps what Newcastle need, maybe a good chance for them to win something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:


I can’t see the EPL teams getting rid of it, but it’s telling that in those countries or leagues where it hasn’t been implemented, there is little call for it to come in.

 

Maybe Im being hopeful but Im not so sure. Id imagine the players would want it gone. Big managers like Mourinho and Klopp have spoken against it before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can understand why Wolves want rid. Apparently this is the league table of changed decisions for the teams who have been in the prem since it was brought in, Wolves are a massive outlier.

 

Quote

Brighton +6

Aston Villa +4

Liverpool +4

Everton +3

Man City +3

Man United +3

Newcastle +3

Chelsea +2

Crystal Palace +2

Tottenham -3

West Ham -5

Arsenal -7

Wolves -17

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading the pirlo autobiography which was written pre VAR. His quote on the use of technology.

 

“They’d be able to settle all the most difficult questions pretty much in real time. Offside yes or no, in all of 5 seconds”. That prediction didn’t work out too well!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pink_triangle said:

Reading the pirlo autobiography which was written pre VAR. His quote on the use of technology.

 

“They’d be able to settle all the most difficult questions pretty much in real time. Offside yes or no, in all of 5 seconds”. That prediction didn’t work out too well!

most difficult questions is surely is the ball over the goalline,  that part has worked well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/16/2024 at 9:17 AM, The Nal said:

 

It ws doomed from the start. Its ruined football. 

It's kinda remarkable about how it's pivoted tbf, given the Henry handball in 2009 lead to anger it wasn't already a thing, which just built over the decade before it came in for the Premier League, and now we seem to be pivoting back.

 

Maybe it's the Black Mirror thing about the fault being not with the technology but with how it's used and if we also had too high an expectation that it would suddenly fix everything.

 

I think also we need to stop being so irrational about referees, lest this filter down to creating a crisis of referees dropping out of football and not being replaced, which means either no refs or worse quality because the numbers who can do it just dwindled that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Neil said:

most difficult questions is surely is the ball over the goalline,  that part has worked well.

Ah I read that as "goal-line", which is governed by it's own system. Rather than whether a ball goes over the byline, given Arsenal fans are still annoyed about that as one of the 27 factors behind the goal that saw Newcastle beat Arsenal at SJP in November.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thetime said:

De Zerbi leaving Brighton. 

 

 

that'll be the end of the Brighton side hussle of a huey Morgan impersonator.  😞

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...