When will this shit end?

[BobWillis2]

3 minutes ago, xxialac said:

Huh?

What exactly have the far left done here towards a dead figure from the past - or to be more accurate to a bit of stone representing him?

Oh, that's right, in both cases nothing.

Why would they feel the need to protect a statue? It’s a peaceful protest isn’t it? 
 

You can turn a blind eye to the undesirables that turned up at Clapham Common last night all you like but the videos are there for all to see. 

[Fuzzy Afro]

New Japanese variant announced. Wouldn't be a Sunday night without some variant porn.

[steviewevie]

It always comes down to churchill statues...signs of the post pandemic culture war to come.

[steviewevie]

1 minute ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

New Japanese variant announced. Wouldn't be a Sunday night without some variant porn.

can you stop scaring us with your variant porn please.

[Crazyfool01]

Just now, Barry Fish said:

Good to see Dick won't resign.

We need women in these powerful positions.

Yawn 🥱 

[xxialac]

5 minutes ago, BobWillis2 said:

Why would they feel the need to protect a statue? It’s a peaceful protest isn’t it? 
 

You can turn a blind eye to the undesirables that turned up at Clapham Common last night all you like but the videos are there for all to see. 

So the BobWillis2 logic is:

- Any people near anything that has security, can now be accused of threatening to attack it simply on the basis that there is security. 

And could the BobWillis2 entertain the idea that this is dogwhistling? Make it look as though these women are trying to attack things to get the public on side?

And in any case it's a statue, an inanimate object.

[steviewevie]

5 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Good to see Dick won't resign.

We need women in these powerful positions.

down with Dick.

[BobWillis2]

Just now, xxialac said:

So the BobWillis2 logic is:

- Any people near anything that has security, can now be accused of threatening to attack it simply on the basis that there is security. 

And could the BobWillis2 entertain the idea that this is dogwhistling? Make it look as though these women are trying to attack things to get the public on side?

And in any case it's a statue, an inanimate object.

As always you miss the point. Nothing changes there. 
 

When these idiots turn up and hijack a good cause and cause damage and violence it detracts from the importance of the protests in the first place. 
The average joe doesn’t remember last summer as a great coming together of the people to fight social injustice, they remember the violence, the arrests and the defacing of statues. It’s what gives fuel to the Neanderthals at football matches that boo players taking the knee. 
I’m sick of seeing it and I’m sick of seeing people defend it. 

[zahidf]

Yup

 

[xxialac]

5 minutes ago, BobWillis2 said:

As always you miss the point. Nothing changes there. 
 

When these idiots turn up and hijack a good cause and cause damage and violence it detracts from the importance of the protests in the first place. 
The average joe doesn’t remember last summer as a great coming together of the people to fight social injustice, they remember the violence, the arrests and the defacing of statues. It’s what gives fuel to the Neanderthals at football matches that boo players taking the knee. 
I’m sick of seeing it and I’m sick of seeing people defend it. 

You made a claim:

Extreme left wing women were hijacking the anti-violence against women agenda with an anti-racism agenda by threatening to do damage and violence to a statue (sic).

It's a completely empty claim.

 

[steviewevie]

That pic of police protecting a churchill statue obviously staged. Make them look like a radical mob, worked so well with the black lives matter lot. 

[Toilet Duck]

5 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Yup

 

Yep, people will die. 180m+ doses short in H1. That’s the scandal. 

[Crazyfool01]

Just now, steviewevie said:

That pic of police protecting a churchill statue obviously staged. Make them look like a radical mob, worked so well with the black lives matter lot. 

It wasn’t staged for a photo if you watch the protest ... there were 3 rings of police at 1 point ringing the statue .... but also at no point can you see anyone making any attempts to get close or cause it any damage ... the police were bearing the brunt of the verbal anger because they were protecting a racist rather than protecting the women ... if the police hadn’t been there it’s likely the march would have just gone past it without incident 

[BobWillis2]

2 minutes ago, xxialac said:

You made a claim:

Extreme left wing women were hijacking the anti-violence against women agenda with an anti-racism agenda by threatening to do damage and violence to a statue (sic).

It's a completely empty claim.

 

Do you think Sarah’s family are pleased to see people waving Palestine flags and shouting fuck the police at a vigil for their daughter that was brutally murdered because she dared to walk home alone? 
 

There’s a photo doing the rounds of a far left parasite who turned up last night with a “free assange” placard. Yes the same Assange accused of raping a woman. 
 

Keep defending the indefensible. 

[xxialac]

1 minute ago, crazyfool1 said:

It wasn’t staged for a photo if you watch the protest ... there were 3 rings of police at 1 point ringing the statue .... but also at no point can you see anyone making any attempts to get close or cause it any damage ... the police were bearing the brunt of the verbal anger because they were protecting a racist rather than protecting the women ... if the police hadn’t been there it’s likely the march would have just gone past it without incident 

Doesn't that only reinforce steviewevie's point?

It is very possible the police wanted to give the impression (via a photo in tomorrow's papers) that the marchers were threatening it.

A photo hints that they were. 

[zahidf]

2 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

Yep, people will die. 180m+ doses short in H1. That’s the scandal. 

For sure. But sounds like moderna will have delays as well. And Pfizer had some a few months ago. It's not just AZN....

I thought AZNs statement was very clear that there isn't evidence of wider issues or issues with the batch from the evidence they presented. 

[steviewevie]

1 minute ago, BobWillis2 said:

Do you think Sarah’s family are pleased to see people waving Palestine flags and shouting fuck the police at a vigil for their daughter that was brutally murdered because she dared to walk home alone? 
 

There’s a photo doing the rounds of a far left parasite who turned up last night with a “free assange” placard. Yes the same Assange accused of raping a woman. 
 

Keep defending the indefensible. 

Piers Corbyn was there with his anti-lockdown crew too.

[Crazyfool01]

1 minute ago, xxialac said:

Doesn't that only reinforce steviewevie's point?

It is very possible the police wanted to give the impression (via a photo in tomorrow's papers) that the marchers were threatening it.

A photo hints that they were. 

Sorry yep .. read that wrong it does that 

[xxialac]

3 minutes ago, BobWillis2 said:

Do you think Sarah’s family are pleased to see people waving Palestine flags and shouting fuck the police at a vigil for their daughter that was brutally murdered because she dared to walk home alone? 
 

There’s a photo doing the rounds of a far left parasite who turned up last night with a “free assange” placard. Yes the same Assange accused of raping a woman. 
 

Keep defending the indefensible. 

Wonderful strawman. One of your best.

You said extreme left wing people had hijacked the protest, as evidenced so you claimed by the police encircling the Churchill statue. 

It's bollocks isn't it.

Edited March 14, 2021 by xxialac

[steviewevie]

What you've all been waiting for.

 

[BobWillis2]

1 minute ago, xxialac said:

Wonderful strawman. One of your best.

You said extreme left wing people had hijacked the protest for racist views, as evidenced so you claimed by the police encircling the Churchill statue. 

It's bollocks isn't it.

You’ll have to point out the part where I mentioned anything to do with racism. As always you’re bringing up points that aren’t there because you’re incapable of debating what’s in front of you. 

[xxialac]

2 minutes ago, BobWillis2 said:

You’ll have to point out the part where I mentioned anything to do with racism. As always you’re bringing up points that aren’t there because you’re incapable of debating what’s in front of you. 

"So the far left have hijacked another cause (VISUAL: POLICE CIRCLING CHURCHILL STATUE, WHICH WAS DEFACED LAST YEAR BY BLM MOVEMENT ON BASIS OF RACIST VIEWS), wonderful"

Unfortunately for you, your words and obvious insinuations are just a click away.

 

[zahidf]

5 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

What you've all been waiting for.

 

He's already been outed as a hysteria whipping force hasn't he?

[steviewevie]

Just now, zahidf said:

He's already been outed as a hysteria whipping force hasn't he?

No.

[zahidf]

Just now, steviewevie said:

No.

The CAPITAL LETTERS are a bit of a giveaway