Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Sasperella said:

Is anyone else confused a out Christmas? Am I right in thinking they've said we can have bubbles of three households over five days...? But there's not be an official announcement? I noticed on a Scottish article that Sturgeon was saying there would probably be some kind of travel restriction on that, but there doesn't seem to be any indication of what that is. Or have I missed something?

No official announcement yet as they're trying to get all the devolved governments to agree, so everyone in the UK is in the same boat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sasperella said:

Is anyone else confused a out Christmas? Am I right in thinking they've said we can have bubbles of three households over five days...? But there's not be an official announcement? I noticed on a Scottish article that Sturgeon was saying there would probably be some kind of travel restriction on that, but there doesn't seem to be any indication of what that is. Or have I missed something?

They are still thrashing this out I think. Possible announcement tomorrow, but I can see it dragging on. Not like people need to make plans or anything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, zahidf said:

Oh I meant why hoping to stay in tier 3?

It's selfish, and lazy but because I prefer it. I work at a pub so means time off work,  gives me more time to do stuff I enjoy. Pubs being open only means I now have to work, which has been a lot more stressful this year with all the rules.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

I make maps for a living so I'm certainly not a flat earther but I am a Covid 19 vaccine sceptic.

so how much data / time do you need before you feel happy to take it ? or will you take it if it becomes necessary to have it to do things ?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, xxialac said:

 

Am I the only one who find this kind of thing an embarrassment?

The leader of the whole country who swans around in golden carriages, has access to an unlimited budget and yet they can't make sure that the tech works at 10 Downing Street?

Great way to project incompetence to the world.

Obviously the technical side of things is being run by former ballet dancers 😋

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So have the explained how you get out of the stricter tiers? As fully expect Greater Manchester to go into Tier 3 but our numbers are dropping rapidly so what is the review process to change tier?

Below is the difference 10 days made (bear in mind the 12th Nov is probably a result of tier 3 whereas the 22nd will be due to lockdown)

 

Manchester covid rates 22-11-20.jpg

Manchester covid rates 12-11-20.jpg

Edited by shoptildrop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no long term data - what if all the people injected with it drop dead in three years, or if they all go blind, or hair falls out or something we just don't know yet. Granted it's very unlikely but we don't know. 

If everyone who want it has it what difference does it make if I choose not to? You as a vaccinated person can probably still give me the virus and I will get as poorly as my body allows. If I have the virus and I give it to you you have increased protection. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

There is no long term data - what if all the people injected with it drop dead in three years, or if they all go blind, or hair falls out or something we just don't know yet. Granted it's very unlikely but we don't know. 

If everyone who want it has it what difference does it make if I choose not to? You as a vaccinated person can probably still give me the virus and I will get as poorly as my body allows. If I have the virus and I give it to you you have increased protection. 

You're still a transmission vector. 

What kind of threshold of data are you looking for before being satisfied the vaccine is ok to take?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

If everyone who want it has it what difference does it make if I choose not to? You as a vaccinated person can probably still give me the virus and I will get as poorly as my body allows. If I have the virus and I give it to you you have increased protection. 

You can still pass it on, some people like the elderly or vunerable who can't have the vaccine could catch it from you. 

Yes there is a risk they can still get it from someone who is vaccinated, but the more who have it then the less likely that is.

Edited by Paul ™
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

You're still a transmission vector. 

What kind of threshold of data are you looking for before being satisfied the vaccine is ok to take?

4 minutes ago, Paul ™ said:

You can still pass it on, some people like the elderly or vunerable who can't have the vaccine could catch it from you. 

Yes there is a risk they can still get it from someone who is vaccinated, but the more who have it then the less likely that is.

 

Just like they could catch it from anyone who has had the vaccine too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...