Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

I think labour have been very clever not calling for his resignation, these things have a habit of rumbling on and on, their stance at the moment has been to try and deflect it as safeguarding the children. But it’s not going to go away and the longer it goes on the worse it gets for them. I think rather than immediately call for his resignation it’s instead give them enough rope to hang themselves. 

They have to be cautious here, as they need to build support again. Starmer seems to get this, I think it’s wise he hasn’t actually made a comment today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has to go if these reports are true. Shapps spent the whole presser saying how Cummings didn't leave the house in Durham etc. It's much harder now to weasel out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jparx said:

He has to go if these reports are true. Shapps spent the whole presser saying how Cummings didn't leave the house in Durham etc. It's much harder now to weasel out of it.

Yep, they tried the angle of saying ‘but he did isolate’ and tried to ignore the bit about it being 250 miles away from his actual home. Absolutely no defence if he didn’t isolate even then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Yep, they tried the angle of saying ‘but he did isolate’ and tried to ignore the bit about it being 250 miles away from his actual home. Absolutely no defence if he didn’t isolate even then.

The thing that baffles me here is that Cummings is a smart bloke (I don't think he's a mega genius like some, but he's obviously calculating), so why did he spend today angrily arguing with reporters when he knew he was apparently out and about around Durham? Seems like these stories, if true, would inevitably get out so why dig yourself in to a bigger hole? Had he apologised and said "look I was worried about my kid. It was a mistake I get that, but it was well intentioned", I think enough people would probably have forgiven him to keep his position and move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jparx said:

The thing that baffles me here is that Cummings is a smart bloke (I don't think he's a mega genius like some, but he's obviously calculating), so why did he spend today angrily arguing with reporters when he knew he was apparently out and about around Durham? Seems like these stories, if true, would inevitably get out so why dig yourself in to a bigger hole? Had he apologised and said "look I was worried about my kid. It was a mistake I get that, but it was well intentioned", I think enough people would probably have forgiven him to keep his position and move on.

Because he doesn’t care, you can see it in that video with the reporters. He has a staggering level of arrogance and it comes across that he believes he’s above the rules that meant for common folk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jparx said:

The thing that baffles me here is that Cummings is a smart bloke (I don't think he's a mega genius like some, but he's obviously calculating), so why did he spend today angrily arguing with reporters when he knew he was apparently out and about around Durham? Seems like these stories, if true, would inevitably get out so why dig yourself in to a bigger hole? Had he apologised and said "look I was worried about my kid. It was a mistake I get that, but it was well intentioned", I think enough people would probably have forgiven him to keep his position and move on.

Yes I said as much in an earlier post. He’s clearly intelligent, I don’t doubt the actual motives behind what he did were well intentioned in terms of his child, because I just cant fathom why if they weren’t, he would risk it knowing that if it was discovered he’d be absolutely crucified. So why not just come clean and explain why he did it from the start. He must be smart enough to know that once these things start they don’t stop and it will just snowball out of control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, fatyeti24 said:

I'm not saying they shouldn't sack him, but doing so wouldn't stop him giving advice. 

Agreed, it will be a resignation/sacking in name only. That said it wouldn’t then take much for any ministers that don’t like him to feed the press the little nugget that he’s still advising the government later on down the line, which would be brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Yes I said as much in an earlier post. He’s clearly intelligent, I don’t doubt the actual motives behind what he did were well intentioned in terms of his child, because I just cant fathom why if they weren’t, he would risk it knowing that if it was discovered he’d be absolutely crucified. So why not just come clean and explain why he did it from the start. He must be smart enough to know that once these things start they don’t stop and it will just snowball out of control.

His arrogance gives him the belief he is above these rules. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Agreed, it will be a resignation/sacking in name only. That said it wouldn’t then take much for any ministers that don’t like him to feed the press the little nugget that he’s still advising the government later on down the line, which would be brilliant.

Yeah true. It might prevent him sitting in on those meetings too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also wanna add that if the Mirror have sat on that second breach and knocked the c**t out with a one-two punch then well played. To have Hancock/Sunak/Raab etc all pledge their allegiance to a fucking advisor under the guise of “top family man stuff” and then the Mirror chucks in this football in the groin. This is a gift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also won't be getting paid, and presumably he'll need to do something for income so he won't, in theory, have the same amount of time to put in to planning etc. And yeah not being allowed in key meetings will be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I also wanna add that if the Mirror have sat on that second breach and knocked the c**t out with a one-two punch then well played. To have Hancock/Sunak/Raab etc all pledge their allegiance to a fucking advisor under the guise of “top family man stuff” and then the Mirror chucks in this football in the groin. This is a gift.

Didn't think of that. Great point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I also wanna add that if the Mirror have sat on that second breach and knocked the c**t out with a one-two punch then well played. To have Hancock/Sunak/Raab etc all pledge their allegiance to a fucking advisor under the guise of “top family man stuff” and then the Mirror chucks in this football in the groin. This is a gift.

not a fan then OZ :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I also wanna add that if the Mirror have sat on that second breach and knocked the c**t out with a one-two punch then well played. To have Hancock/Sunak/Raab etc all pledge their allegiance to a fucking advisor under the guise of “top family man stuff” and then the Mirror chucks in this football in the groin. This is a gift.

Yup. Cummings screwed the cabinet over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, zahidf said:

Yup. Cummings screwed the cabinet over.

If we lived in a normal country this would make a huge difference.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...