Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

Even the Mumfords had their own little thread that chugged along under the radar for a few months, with the sheepish participants politely requesting that people leave them to enjoy their grubby little proclivities in peace. I suppose Adele has the odd endorsement from CalGon, and a few others grumbling that their partner is making them go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

56 minutes ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

Even the Mumfords had their own little thread that chugged along under the radar for a few months, with the sheepish participants politely requesting that people leave them to enjoy their grubby little proclivities in peace. I suppose Adele has the odd endorsement from CalGon, and a few others grumbling that their partner is making them go.

My oh my oh my

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

JP 2010 - it was glorious man! Even then I knew it wasn't cool, but just for a moment, I didn't care and really enjoyed them.

am guilty too...the first record had me, and I caught that JP set in the afternoon and at the time i thought it was one of the better JP sets i'd seen at Glasto if you managed to get into the tent and enjoy it...Black Keys right after too, not knowing i was missing 2/5 of Radiohead up at the Park...perceptions change though...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tevaburger said:

am guilty too...the first record had me, and I caught that JP set in the afternoon and at the time i thought it was one of the better JP sets i'd seen at Glasto if you managed to get into the tent and enjoy it...Black Keys right after too, not knowing i was missing 2/5 of Radiohead up at the Park...perceptions change though...

 

Never mind guilt. That was a very good gig. The album had been out just about long enough for everyone to learn the words, but not quite long enough for them to becomen insufferable.

Wicked atmosphere in the tent, probably my best gig of that festival, even if I never listen to them now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Never mind guilt. That was a very good gig. The album had been out just about long enough for everyone to learn the words, but not quite long enough for them to becomen insufferable.

Wicked atmosphere in the tent, probably my best gig of that festival, even if I never listen to them now.

spot on, couldn't have said it better...don't touch the record now and it was my missus who first started telling me to "stop playing that! have heard it enough already" which was around that time actually

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wooderson said:

Whilst my love for a tier-1 pyramid headline performance remains as strong as ever, it's good for the fest in general that there's so little interest in the top of the bill. 

there's interest, just not so much on this forum. i'd argue that Muse, Adele and Coldplay will have at least one of the biggest collective headliner crowds the festival has seen (Muse obviously being the slightly weaker link in that trio but not by much). in a decade when we've had Arcade Fire and Metallica in one year this year looks positively massive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

there's interest, just not so much on this forum. i'd argue that Muse, Adele and Coldplay will have at least one of the biggest collective headliner crowds the festival has seen (Muse obviously being the slightly weaker link in that trio but not by much). in a decade when we've had Arcade Fire and Metallica in one year this year looks positively massive

Far, far more interesting bookings, both of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

interesting? yes. crowd pleasing and good for ratings and media? not so much

It's very hard to measure out prove, but my feeling is that while Coldplay may leave more people merely pleased, Metallica and Arcade Fire left more people delighted. Fewer fans in total, but more devoted.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

"Interesting" is still subjective.  Metallica I'll grant you, but Adele's first ever big festival headlining show arguably trumps Arcade Fire's umpteenth, showcasing a terrible new album.

You take that back! I'm a huge fan of Reflektor and I genuinely thought their headlining performance was one of the best I've seen at the festival. From where I was in the crowd, everyone was having a fantastic time. It had a carnival atmosphere! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LeeGalvin said:

You take that back! I'm a huge fan of Reflektor and I genuinely thought their headlining performance was one of the best I've seen at the festival. From where I was in the crowd, everyone was having a fantastic time. It had a carnival atmosphere! 

I thought they were brilliant on that Friday night after Elbow, and I didn't  know their stuff very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, stuartbert two hats said:

It's very hard to measure out prove, but my feeling is that while Coldplay may leave more people merely pleased, Metallica and Arcade Fire left more people delighted. Fewer fans in total, but more devoted.

 

Tbh I didnt like Arcade Fire at all :p, not my thing

Youre right tho that most of the crowd seemed to be having a great time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, LeeGalvin said:

You take that back! I'm a huge fan of Reflektor and I genuinely thought their headlining performance was one of the best I've seen at the festival. From where I was in the crowd, everyone was having a fantastic time. It had a carnival atmosphere! 

Their 2014 Glastonbury set is towards the lower end of my most enjoyed festival headliner sets. Their Reading 2010 show is vying for 1st place. Different strokes 'n' all that.

Edited by Winslow Leach
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...