Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Blur?


wozwebs

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Seems that booking T-Swizz was the ony smart move they've made all year.

Indeed, still has lots of fans who are not in the gig going loop as such yet and have no idea what a terrible venue it is.

Its the advertising they do in London for it to, posters on the underground/on the sides of buses! Must cost them a bomb to do all that! Very few other gigs in London do that unless its tied in with album promotion/on top of the venue itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Used to buy loads of tickets last minute from eBay. Got a pair for Oasis in Heaton Park for £9 a few years back.

I've seen a few things at Hyde Park over the years (including Blur twice) and it is every bit as bad as people are saying. The 2012 Olympic gig was a joke, listen to the live recording and you can hear people yelling "turn it up!" all the way through.

Like everyone else I'll wait a couple of months for the prices to go stupidly low. There's no chance BST will allow Blur to play to a half empty field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They really are getting desperate aren't they? Shame there were not Ebay auctions for tickets anymore - you'd get a right steal in June on those.

Spot on - when they played Hyde Park in 2009, I managed to get 2 for £40-45! I remember face value being around that - and I'm intrigued why it's virtually doubled within 6 years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

best ebay one for me was old trafford cricket ground - saw REM in 2005 and Green Day in 2010 for £20 each, when tickets were meant to be £45!

I think I pulled off the same feat, more or less. God, I miss REM - that night was good, but 2003 on the Pyramid was as good it gets!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We saw Blur in 2012 and had a great time. However we were very close to the front; some of our friends were further back and could barely hear anything.

Luckily we'd been in Hyde Park the day before for the free Olympic stuff and so knew how expensive and awful the food/drink was. We had a few pints and big pub lunch before hand and had also found the "better" semi-hidden bar in the corner.

Still not convinced I'd go back to Hyde Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I pulled off the same feat, more or less. God, I miss REM - that night was good, but 2003 on the Pyramid was as good it gets!

Can imagine! Idlewild, Zutons and Feeder supporting at LCCC that night. in 2005 that was a very good lineup! Would probably enjoy that today to be fair not that many others would

Link to comment
Share on other sites

saw REM in 2005 and Green Day in 2010 for £20 each,

Muse and Green Day for £10 each. XFM Winter Wonderland tickets for 99p

Wow! I can't even imagine being able to buy gig tickets for that price now, and that's in the space of what 5 years. The going rates at StubHub are just as ridiculous as every other ticket resale website.

Spot on - when they played Hyde Park in 2009, I managed to get 2 for £40-45! I remember face value being around that - and I'm intrigued why it's virtually doubled within 6 years...

That I think in part is the problem. Inflation hasn't doubled and neither have people got twice as rich. If you were to do a survey as the why festival attendances are plummeting I reckon the top response would be the prices and not the poor quality line ups. V ticket are appallingly priced given the line up.

I think more and more festival will follow R&L's model this year. High weekend camping costs for the young 1st timers and the core fan base who go every year regardless. And them cheaper day tickets, that will sell on the strength of a headline booking and 3/4 appropriate acts lower down the bill to appeal to those fans.

Regarding Hyde Park as a venue, I may be young and naive here as it can count the major concerts I've been to on two hands, but the sound was pretty much the only thing about BST that I didn't have a problem with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason they're striggling can be summed up in four words: Eighty. Quid. A. Ticket. Whoever set that pricing screwed up royally. I'm curious to know how many they've sold, less than half? Can't be a huge number of they're already getting desperate in terms of marketing.

It'll be embarrassing for all concerned if Blur (and The Strokes) walk out to a half-empty Hyde Park. Then again, with fewer people you may be able to hear something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason they're striggling can be summed up in four words: Eighty. Quid. A. Ticket. Whoever set that pricing screwed up royally. I'm curious to know how many they've sold, less than half? Can't be a huge number of they're already getting desperate in terms of marketing.

It'll be embarrassing for all concerned if Blur (and The Strokes) walk out to a half-empty Hyde Park. Then again, with fewer people you may be able to hear something.

and get to the bar!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! I can't even imagine being able to buy gig tickets for that price now, and that's in the space of what 5 years. The going rates at StubHub are just as ridiculous as every other ticket resale website.

Ah you just need to have alerts on - for example I got Row A courteeners tickets off stubhub for face value for a gig where standing was going for £100. It is down to the sellers a lot of the time and sometimes you'll get lucky especially for bigger gigs. The days of majorly cheap gigs are gone but if you are after a sold out gig face value isnt out the question.

The only problem is that the listing disappears 4-5 days before the gig so the cheap tickets are forever gone, which is a shame.

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am.holding out for below £50 for blur, still hoping for some smaller dates

I think 3/4 gigs at Ally Pally and gigs at the MEN & Hydro would've been much better received than another Hyde Park gig and a very overpriced one a that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! I can't even imagine being able to buy gig tickets for that price now, and that's in the space of what 5 years. The going rates at StubHub are just as ridiculous as every other ticket resale website.

That I think in part is the problem. Inflation hasn't doubled and neither have people got twice as rich. If you were to do a survey as the why festival attendances are plummeting I reckon the top response would be the prices and not the poor quality line ups. V ticket are appallingly priced given the line up.

I think more and more festival will follow R&L's model this year. High weekend camping costs for the young 1st timers and the core fan base who go every year regardless. And them cheaper day tickets, that will sell on the strength of a headline booking and 3/4 appropriate acts lower down the bill to appeal to those fans.

Regarding Hyde Park as a venue, I may be young and naive here as it can count the major concerts I've been to on two hands, but the sound was pretty much the only thing about BST that I didn't have a problem with.

I've seen both Blur gigs, Pulp and Neil Young in Hyde Park. Although the sound has got worse/quieter since Blur in 2009, it only adds to the other problems. Last year for NY was a disaster - so corporate, poorly organised and lacking in atmosphere. The priority viewing area was a complete joke - if you arrived early enough you could be on the barrier with a general ticket. The second stage was ridiculous. At Pulp it was a tent with plenty of room - and the acts were arguably too small to fill the tent. Last year, the location was more within the main arena so they went for an enclosed stage - it was like a sauna. They'd also incorporated a bar and several booths (clearly not enough bars elsewhere selling overpriced shit pints...) so the capacity was far smaller.

The scheduling meant that The National and Midlake were a direct clash. I'd wager that a lot of younger NY fans would like both of these bands. Once the capacity became full, they had a queuing system - so people were queueing for Midlake around 2 hours before they were on, with no guarantee of getting in. Meanwhile Tom Odell (or Odull, as my mate suggested!) was boring everyone before The National on the main stage!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...