Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

as much as i loved Metallica being there, them headlining seemed very much a novelty rather than 'wow we got Metallica!'. it was a lot more down to the fact that they wouldn't usually headline Glastonbury than being an impressive booking (because it wasn't - they headline a festival here every year). people aren't ever gonna look back and think 'wow can't believe they bagged Metallica that year' like they will with the Stones, U2, Stevie Wonder etc

It really depends who's telling the story I would imagine, there will be a lot of people inclined to look back and think wow I can't believe we got Metallica, mostly because it was never seemed as a band who would headline glastonbury, it'll definitely be a headliner that's remembered many years down the line I feel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 times but................4 fucking times! Fuck off Martin.............Can we change the record...........Id prefer if it was the likes of Kanye or Rihanna..............2 fuckers I utterly despise, but at least they'd be different/new

if Coldplay do headline this year (and inevitably don't break up afterwards) i really do hope they fuck off for a long long time (like Chris Martin said they would after their 2011 performance)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as much as i loved Metallica being there, them headlining seemed very much a novelty rather than 'wow we got Metallica!'. it was a lot more down to the fact that they wouldn't usually headline Glastonbury than being an impressive booking (because it wasn't - they headline a festival here every year). people aren't ever gonna look back and think 'wow can't believe they bagged Metallica that year' like they will with the Stones, U2, Stevie Wonder etc

I agree, but Coldplay and The Foo Fighters headline festivals all the time so the 3rd headliner needs to be someone to write home about. (Swift is doing 2 others this year already)

Edited by FuzzyDunlop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

as much as i loved Metallica being there, them headlining seemed very much a novelty rather than 'wow we got Metallica!'. it was a lot more down to the fact that they wouldn't usually headline Glastonbury than being an impressive booking (because it wasn't - they headline a festival here every year). people aren't ever gonna look back and think 'wow can't believe they bagged Metallica that year' like they will with the Stones, U2, Stevie Wonder etc

Its not "wow we got Metallica".......................Its "wow I cant believe we got Metallica at Glastonbury! Fair balls to ya ME. Never thought we would see the day"...............It was (as I say) massive! And goes down as a very big deal for the fest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes more sense. Cheers.

yeah that's what i meant - thought there would be some confusion when i typed it. Foos, Coldplay and Swift are everywhere all the time - you're almost forced to listen to them. Young and Sprinsteen (and anything bar Song 2 by Blur) you actually have to delve in to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, but Coldplay and The Foo Fighters headline festivals all the time so the 3rd headliner needs to be someone to write home about. (Swift is doing 2 others this year already)

yeah i realised the irony in what i was saying after i posted. i guess there just aren't that many acts who could be considered a rarity left - Prince, AC/DC, Fleetwood Mac, all acts who (we think) the festival has tried and failed to get in the past two years. they've used up everybody - it's the penance we have to pay for having both Young and Springsteen in the same year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i guess there just aren't that many acts who could be considered a rarity left - Prince, AC/DC, Fleetwood Mac.................

There is a few but a lot have various types of difficulties associated with them

Radiohead (as its actually has been so long)

Madonna

Elton John

The Eagles

Pearl Jam

Eminem

Bob Dylan

Green Day

Sting/The Police

Depeche Mode

The Stone Roses

Dire Straits

Guns N Roses

The likes of Floyd, Zeppelin and Queen dont really exist anymore but.....................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a few but a lot have various types of difficulties associated with them

Radiohead (as its actually has been so long)

Madonna

Elton John

The Eagles

Pearl Jam

Eminem

Bob Dylan

Green Day

Sting/The Police

Depeche Mode

The Stone Roses

Dire Straits

Guns N Roses

The likes of Floyd, Zeppelin and Queen dont really exist anymore but.....................

The Eagles, Pearl Jam, Eminem, Bob Dylan, Green Day, Guns N Roses, Dire Straits will just never be booked to headline i don't think.

Depeche Mode... as much as they're constantly rumoured. i just don't see it ever happening

The Stone Roses will perhaps be booked if/when they release a new album i guess...

The Police would need to reform first - Sting wouldn't headline alone

Madonna and Elton must be contenders - although considering Elton now seems to be doing every festival ever, it wouldn't be too special

Radiohead MUST be in the running for next year. if they aren't booked next year off the back of a new album then it's a travesty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all banana talk aside, whilst Young, Springsteen and Blur was a dream for some people (on this forum especially), i bet a lot of others looked at it and thought 'fucking hell, pensioner fest 2009'. 2009's headliners were for people who love music - 2015's are for people who listen to music

Worst comment I've seen on here.

Firstly, we haven't even got the headliners for 2015 yet so you're just speculating there. Could be more surprises to come.

Secondly, regardless of who the headliners are it's personal opinion weather people love that music. What a ridiculous statement to make that it would be for people who like 'listening to music'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worst comment I've seen on here.

Firstly, we haven't even got the headliners for 2015 yet so you're just speculating there. Could be more surprises to come.

Secondly, regardless of who the headliners are it's personal opinion weather people love that music. What a ridiculous statement to make that it would be for people who like 'listening to music'.

aren't you the person who's constantly kicking off over Taylor Swift being a possibility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all banana talk aside, whilst Young, Springsteen and Blur was a dream for some people (on this forum especially), i bet a lot of others looked at it and thought 'fucking hell, pensioner fest 2009'. 2009's headliners were for people who love music - 2015's are for people who listen to music

What if you like Young, Springsteen, Blur and Coldplay?

And Metallica and The Stones and U2 and Gorillaz and Hobo Jones.

Am I listening to or loving music?

Or am I just very confused?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if you like Young, Springsteen, Blur and Coldplay?

And Metallica and The Stones and U2 and Gorillaz and Hobo Jones.

Am I listening to or loving music?

Or am I just very confused?

it was more a general statement on Foos, Coldplay and Taylor Swift all being very radio friendly, current and everywhere. even people who have no real interest in music will know a fair few of their songs, unlike Young, Springsteen and Blur, who, if you're a fan of (especially a younger fan), you will've had to go out of your way to listen to and become a fan of

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FloorFiller, on 04 Feb 2015 - 11:30 AM, said:snapback.png

And many would have said that about the likes of Jay Z, Kylie and Metallica etc etc..................

They'd never book Guns N Roses because they're too unreliable

I don't think Green Day or Eminem would be any great achievement to book and I don't think Dire Straits would headline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Eagles, Pearl Jam, Eminem, Bob Dylan, Green Day, Guns N Roses, Dire Straits will just never be booked to headline i don't think.

Agree with most on that list.

Why not The Eagles or Pearl Jam though?

I think both would go down well with a lot of people and certainly wouldn't be a bland booking like most people agree that coldplay/foo's is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with most on that list.

Why not The Eagles or Pearl Jam though?

I think both would go down well with a lot of people and certainly wouldn't be a bland booking like most people agree that coldplay/foo's is.

The Eagles were heavily rumoured for last year and were discussed to death - personally (and i think a lot of people will agree) that they're just not a right fit for Glastonbury. kind of the same for Pearl Jam - the Glastonbury crowd would be largely uninterested (plus The Eagles fees would probably be far too big for Glastonbury, and i doubt Eavis would extend said fees like he did with the Stones)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...